On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote:
Having svn-X.0 in the source tree, imported at great expense of time and
effort, will provide exactly _zero_ benefits if the underlying format of
the repository changes (like subversion likes doing really often).
On 14 Mar 2013, at 23:47, Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:57:25 +0100, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:25:22 -0500, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
No.
On 2013-03-09 22:04, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas writes:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
No.
[good reasons for not including subversion ellided]
On the other hand ...
The traditional - and I believe still canonical -
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2013-03-09 22:04, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas writes:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
No.
[good reasons for not including subversion ellided]
On the other hand ...
The traditional - and I believe
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:18:04 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
No body has made a case for NOT including svn in the base system. If it
can be a port there is no reason why it can not be included in the base
system.
Giorgos did when he said Subversion is a large system, with a
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:18:04 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
No body has made a case for NOT including svn in the base system. If it
can be a port there is no reason why it can not be included in the base
system.
Giorgos did when he said Subversion
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:39:50 -0400, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:18:04 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
No body has made a case for NOT including svn in the base system. If
it can be a port there is no reason why it can not be
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
Is the new pkg system going to totally replace the pkg_ system in the
base 9.2-Release?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:25:22 -0500, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
No.
Subversion is a large system, with a ton of dependencies, and there's
basically _nothing_ to gain by having to spend extra effort trying to
keep an imported
Giorgos Keramidas writes:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
No.
[good reasons for not including subversion ellided]
On the other hand ...
The traditional - and I believe still canonical - way of
updating the system is to recompile
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE?
not sure about svn, but this port has recently been commited:
http://www.freshports.org/net/svnup/
it is a csup replacement.
-pete
--
pete wright
www.nycbug.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
