On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Demelier
demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope it will be removed soon, it pollutes the uname -a output.
I don't hope so. It helps us keep track of the exact revision
numbers of deployed servers here. Please don't remove it,
or at least, provide an
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
2012/12/15 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
Anders N. wic...@baot.se writes:
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826.
This is on a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update
I hope it will be removed soon, it pollutes the uname -a output.
2012/12/15 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
Anders N. wic...@baot.se writes:
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826.
This is on a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826. This is on
a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update (binary). On another
system, upgraded from 9.0-RELEASE via freebsd-update (source), there is nothing
at all and uname -a looks normal. Two other people I asked
On 12/15/12 13:44, Anders N. wrote:
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826. This is on
a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update (binary). On another system, upgraded from
9.0-RELEASE via freebsd-update (source), there is nothing at all and uname -a
Anders N. wic...@baot.se writes:
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826.
This is on a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update
(binary). On another system, upgraded from 9.0-RELEASE via
freebsd-update (source), there is nothing at all and uname -a looks
