i am puzzled by what seems to be almost a parallel processor development
model that exists with freebsd. when 7 came out people were still
working on 6.3 i think it was with the aim of going to 6.4 and now with
7.x underway, there is work being do for 8 (for which you can get a
snapshot cd. (i
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:25:59 -0800, prad p...@towardsfreedom.com wrote:
i am puzzled by what seems to be almost a parallel processor
development model that exists with freebsd. when 7 came out people
were still working on 6.3 i think it was with the aim of going to 6.4
and now with 7.x
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:25:59 -0800, prad p...@towardsfreedom.com wrote:
is the idea to make each version 'as good as possible' because it
would still be useful for older machines? or is it that later
versions can utilize code from the earlier versions? or is it
something else?
I hope it
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:25:59PM -0800, prad wrote:
i am puzzled by what seems to be almost a parallel processor development
model that exists with freebsd. when 7 came out people were still
working on 6.3 i think it was with the aim of going to 6.4 and now with
7.x underway, there is work
prad wrote:
i am puzzled by what seems to be almost a parallel processor development
model that exists with freebsd. when 7 came out people were still
working on 6.3 i think it was with the aim of going to 6.4 and now with
7.x underway, there is work being do for 8 (for which you can get a
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:39:39 +0200
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
The thesis of Niklas Saers is a bit dated now, but it is a wonderful
document and it answers this question (including a few others too).
I think it will be an interesting read for you:
most certainly!!
