On 6/15/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something. too often in vim,
hitting 'u' --- sometimes once
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:46:45 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo command. as
most of you can understand, there are a whole slew of times when i
need to undo something. too often in vim, hitting 'u' --- sometimes
once
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:51:06PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:18:42PM -0700, Michael K. Smith wrote:
On 6/14/09 7:46 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 6/15/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:12:01PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:46:45 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo command. as
most of you can understand, there are a whole slew of times when i
need to undo
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:45:54 Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:12:01PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
In vim, with set compatible enabled, typing 'u' repeatedly toggles
between the last two states of the buffer. In compatible mode I am
not sure of how to undo multiple
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:14:44PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote:
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:45:54 Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:12:01PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
In vim, with set compatible enabled, typing 'u' repeatedly toggles
between the last two states of the buffer.
On 6/15/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 6/15/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:22:48 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
PS: if gvim ever evolves into a word-processor, life will be
*perfect* ;-)
If you load a LaTeX file in gvim, it will get ahead of a
word processor and evolve into a typesetting system. :-)
--
Polytropon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:17AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:22:48 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
PS: if gvim ever evolves into a word-processor, life will be
*perfect* ;-)
If you load a LaTeX file in gvim, it will get ahead of a
word
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:00:30PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
Yeah, see, this is exactly my problem. UAually, i just hit 'u'
once, check my code, continue. But then I think there may be
cap-u ['U'] ... or maybe not. It's only happened three or four
times, but that
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Nvi is not Vi, and Vim is not Nvi clone.
I thought that was self-evident.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Steve McConnell: Good code is its own best documentation. As
you're about
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 05:44:04PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:00:30PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
I feel like the original vi is insufficient for my needs, but that Vim's
development doesn't exactly match my preferences. FreeBSD's nvi seems to
have moved in exactly
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something. too often in vim,
hitting 'u' --- sometimes once accidentally --- has resulted in
a small
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something. too often in vim,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:00:59PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
hi glenn,
One 'n'. :)
yeah, i read the recent posts about the key binding and vim;
that's what brought my question to the fore. i did read on the
evolution list that a gvim plugin may happen.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:24:29PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
hi glenn,
One 'n'. :)
gotcha! and see, this is a case of my occasionally typing 1
key. in vim, typing 'uu' can cause a truckload of
On 6/14/09 7:46 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something. too often in vim,
hitting 'u' --- sometimes once accidentally ---
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:18:42PM -0700, Michael K. Smith wrote:
On 6/14/09 7:46 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
the main reason i don't use vim is because of its [u]ndo
command. as most of you can understand, there are a whole slew
of times when i need to undo something. too
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:24:29PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote:
hi glenn,
One 'n'. :)
gotcha! and see, this is a case of my occasionally
21 matches
Mail list logo
