On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 8:36, Eduardo Morras wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:32:39 -0600 (MDT)
Mike Brown m...@skew.org wrote:
alexus wrote:
ok, I just did fetch install and got bumped from p5 to p9
# uname -a
FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun
Hi,
I've a Seagate constellation ES.2 which supports 4K sectors but diskinfo shows
it as 512bytes;
da0 512 3000592982016 5860533168 0 0 364801 255
63
I understand that Seagate ships these drives to be compatible with 512byte
sectors so that older Windows OSs
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:43 AM, yudi v yudi@gmail.com wrote:
Generally, it's recommended to let ZFS manage the whole disk if possible,
so I was wondering if the second option is better.
I will be using couple of 3TB HDDs mirrored for data and want to encrypt
them.
IIRC, there is/was a major
On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote:
Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS?
I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case
of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist
Empowering over 7 billion minutes of capacity, worth $100 million + in annual
revenue.
View this email in your browser
(http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=e4d36e6f46c28d475852d0327id=8c7989deb5e=a65c582268)
Last week, I had a really good, heart to heart talk with a lady that had been
struggling in her business for a while.
She had not made any money, people were not getting back to her, and she was
ready to give up on the whole thing.
I asked her if she was treating it like a job or a hobby???
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, aurfalien wrote:
Hi,
I've a Seagate constellation ES.2 which supports 4K sectors but diskinfo shows
it as 512bytes;
da0 512 3000592982016 5860533168 0 0 364801 255
63
I understand that Seagate ships these drives to be compatible with
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, aurfalien wrote:
On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote:
Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS?
I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case
of later runs, will
Hello,
Handbook section 31.9 describes the setup of NAT.
Section 31.9.3 suggests net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept=1 during
the first attempts to setup a firewall and NAT gateway.
Section 31.9.5 suggests I specify a predefined firewall ruleset that
allows anything in with firewall_type=OPEN
At 01:58 10/6/2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 01:29:19 -0500, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Try /rescue/ls explicitely instead.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of
At 08:47 10/6/2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
The emergency holographic shell was always very
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
At 08:47 10/6/2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
The emergency
Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:45:58 -0500, W. D. wrote:
Thanks, Polytropon. I couldn't get FrieSBIE to work.
It's a rather old project, and as far as I know, it isn't
being continued anymore. It should still support at least
the CLI mode for most computers... (I have to admit that
I'm still using it,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:38:45 +0200, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Handbook section 31.9 describes the setup of NAT.
Section 31.9.3 suggests net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept=1 during
the first attempts to setup a firewall and NAT gateway.
Section 31.9.5 suggests I
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
ipfw always has one default rule, standard is
[snip]
Specifing firewall_type=OPEN gives you an additional rule
Michael,
Thank you that is exactly what I am seeing.
Chris
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
