ssh using key authentication and sudo configured to allow a certain
user to run the needed commands and only the needed commands as root.
rsh? Are you living in a cave? :)
Thanks for the replies.
The original script was written at the cave era, only I am trying to
improve it today.
Would
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
When creating the tap interface, my system gives the following
FreeBSD# uname -a
FreeBSD FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
FreeBSD# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 11 0xc040 6f7554 kernel
21 0xc0af8000 140c0
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:04:57PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:58:48PM -0500, Jeremy Gransden wrote:
I did some googling but nothing interesting turned up. I find it
curious that the latest build of Thunderbird works, but linux-firefox
fails like it's
Hi,
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:13:21PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Joshua Isom wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Joshua Isom wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 1:32 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
His was a classic case of
root, that could be automated in a script (no password required).
- have information input into browser
- have web server save information to server disk in non-executable format
- have script (or admin) authenticate/authorize commands to be performed
(recommend doing this manually for a while
Is a partition close to full, use df to see that.
doesn't matter as ls read, not writes.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ls | wc
strange. i did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/b]$ a=0;while [ $a -lt 1 ];do mkdir $a;a=$[a+1];done
completed 25 seconds on 1Ghz CPU
ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time.
unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
ls | wc
strange. i did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/b]$ a=0;while [ $a -lt 1 ];do mkdir $a;a=$[a+1];done
completed 25 seconds on 1Ghz CPU
ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time.
unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong.
In response to Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ls | wc
strange. i did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/b]$ a=0;while [ $a -lt 1 ];do mkdir $a;a=$[a+1];done
completed 25 seconds on 1Ghz CPU
ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time.
unless you have 486/33 or
Freminlins wrote:
I used to find FreeBSD easy. What has happened? I have a couple of machines
I usually install new versions on, one is headless the other is a desktop
machine (which was a 100% reliable 5.4 installation). I boot the headless
machine using floppies, then install across the net.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:42:44 -0500
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ls | wc
strange. i did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/b]$ a=0;while [ $a -lt 1 ];do mkdir
$a;a=$[a+1];done
completed 25 seconds on 1Ghz CPU
ls takes 0.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2007-Nov-29, at 01:29, Le Cocq Michel wrote:
I'm in front of the same trouble, did you find a solution ?
No, I haven't found a solution, and haven't received any
suggestions. I've moved on until the FreeBSD under Xen thing becomes
a bit
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:04:37AM -0500, Matt Pounsett wrote:
On 2007-Nov-29, at 01:29, Le Cocq Michel wrote:
I'm in front of the same trouble, did you find a solution ?
No, I haven't found a solution, and haven't received any
suggestions. I've moved on until the FreeBSD under Xen
On Nov 28, 2007 11:37 PM, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although sudo and SSH are part of the solution, providing a web server
with full rights on a remote server if they can gain keyless entry is a
large mistake.
Steve,
at no point does the original email say we need to
On 29/11/2007, Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I do a pkg_add -r xorg. After about 70 packages I give up. I only
used to
have about 65 packages in total on my old desktop, now I need more than
70
and I haven't even got x windows up yet. So I go off and have a look and
ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time.
unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong.
Has anyone tried fsck and/or smartmontools on the drive? Maybe something
like Spinrite?
he stated that CPU load is near 100% so it's not disk problem
unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong.
Another possible scenario is that the directory is badly fragmented.
Unless something has changed since I last researched this (which is
it is for sure.
the fix would be
mv /usr/home /usr/oldhome;mkdir /usr/home;mv
I guess that replacing qsort(3) in
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/fts.c:fts_sort()
with another sort algorithm which doesn't
expose this anomaly would solve that problem.
for sure his /home wasn't worst case. it's just average case so it's not
that problem.
I'm running ataidle on my personal server to save electricity.
saving your drive instead of electricity is much more economic.
all drives prefers running in stable environment - like being up 24h/day.
average drive takes 10Watts , so it's 90kWh/year.
in Poland it's about 30PLN/year, assuming
o
The latest problem, first noted about 12 hours ago, is that
while gdm worked, nothing else of gnome does. Not as kline,
not as root. Am I missing some startup or initialization
binary??
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 18:52:06 schrieb Miguel Alcántara:
Grettings to this list. Well, I have a doubt about Broadcom HOT_TOPIC and
FBSD 6.2
Good for you. What's the question?
--
Heiko Wundram
Product Application Development
___
it is for sure.
the fix would be
mv /usr/home /usr/oldhome;mkdir /usr/home;mv /usr/oldhome/* /usr/home
and after successfull move - rm -rf /usr/home
I really hope you meant: rm -rf /usr/oldhome
Also, mv just moves pointers around, wouldn't a cp -Rp be needed instead?
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:21:06AM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
o
The latest problem, first noted about 12 hours ago, is that
while gdm worked, nothing else of gnome does. Not as kline,
not as root. Am I missing some startup or initialization
binary??
I
Grettings to this list. Well, I have a doubt about Broadcom HOT_TOPIC and
FBSD 6.2
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freminlins wrote:
snip
Err, yeah. Look through hundreds of packages to see which dependencies they
have. Helpful. Not.
This way of doing X11 is seriously unhelpful to end users. If having
individual packages for everything is so good, please tell me why everything
in /bin, /usr/bin and so on
williamkow schrieb:
I am newbie, recently I have installed FreeBSD 6.2-Stable, and manage to
configure and display the x window manager (X11) using command startx.
and then i run command startkde and I received error message
(kpersonalizer: cannot connect to X server)
However, if i run command
the fix would be
mv /usr/home /usr/oldhome;mkdir /usr/home;mv /usr/oldhome/* /usr/home
and after successfull move - rm -rf /usr/home
I like this idea very much...
It results in 100% data loss of your /usr/home contents...
;-)
___
Hello,
I run a FreeBSD Jailer and I want to have multiple jails in 2
seperate networks. The server has 2 network interfaces and each of
them are connected in a different network. Say vlan1 and vlan2.
My problem is that all the network traffic is going through the
first interface
I have Claws-mail installed on my workstation. It's compiled here from
ports. I need to generate a statically-linked package, for
installation on an older install of FreeBSD. (6.1 RELEASE, but running
Xorg 6.9.0, I am running Xorg 7.3)
Can this be done?
If so, what's the general procedure.
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 21:25 +0100, Tino Engel wrote:
williamkow schrieb:
I am newbie, recently I have installed FreeBSD 6.2-Stable, and manage to
configure and display the x window manager (X11) using command startx.
and then i run command startkde and I received error message
Sorry, I don't know what could happen, it's no the first time(maybe gmail,
or safari browser). Well, I must rewrite all over again.
I have a laptop compaq presario f500 with a wireless integrated chip, which
is a Broadcom one, it has winxp, fbsd6.2, rofreesbie. I had tested many
times trying to
Sorry, I don't know what could happen, it's no the first time(maybe gmail,
or safari browser). Well, I must rewrite all over again.
I have a laptop compaq presario f500 with a wireless integrated chip, which
is a Broadcom one, it has winxp, fbsd6.2, rofreesbie. I had tested many
times trying to
Hello.
After hearing FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 was released, I wanted to upgrade to that from my
6.3-BETA2 installation. This worked fine when I went from 6.2-RELEASE to
6.3-BETA2, but after trying to follow the directions at
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-10-freebsd-minor-version-upgrade.html
I
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:43:27AM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
An American's a person who isn't afraid to criticize
the president but is always polite to traffic cops.
That's a very good point (barring edge cases like belligerent idiots who
aren't polite to traffic cops, either, but tend to
Apologies if this isn't the correct forum. I'd like to configure DNS on my
home network but make it work simultaneously with DHCP. So, when hosts are
plugged into the network and issued an IP, DNS is updated to reflect the
hostnames. That way I can refer to all my machines by name in all
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Clint Olsen wrote:
Apologies if this isn't the correct forum. I'd like to configure DNS on
my home network but make it work simultaneously with DHCP. So, when
hosts are plugged into the network and issued an IP, DNS is updated to
reflect the hostnames. That way
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Clint Olsen wrote:
Apologies if this isn't the correct forum. I'd like to configure
DNS on my
home network but make it work simultaneously with DHCP. So, when
hosts are
plugged into the network and issued an IP, DNS is updated to reflect
the
hostnames.
Testing 7.0 beta2 so I should upgrade to beta3, but all was working
well until I portupgraded yesterday. Now amarok shuts down X server:
Nov 30 00:14:37 asus kdm-bin[1146]: X server for display :0 terminated
unexpectedly
I get a couple of lines of text if I start it from an xterm, but they
are
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:47:01 +
John Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing 7.0 beta2 so I should upgrade to beta3, but all was working
well until I portupgraded yesterday. Now amarok shuts down X server:
Nov 30 00:14:37 asus kdm-bin[1146]: X server for display :0 terminated
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:09:00PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote:
Apologies if this isn't the correct forum. I'd like to configure DNS on my
home network but make it work simultaneously with DHCP. So, when hosts are
plugged into the network and issued an IP, DNS is updated to reflect the
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:30:22 -0500
Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:47:01 +
John Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing 7.0 beta2 so I should upgrade to beta3, but all was working
well until I portupgraded yesterday. Now amarok shuts down X server:
Nov
John Murphy schrieb:
Very useful script that. Many thanks.
The only ports upgraded at the time were:
Nov 29 01:23:55 2007 samba-3.0.26a_2,1
Nov 29 01:27:05 2007 samba-libsmbclient-3.0.26a_2
Nov 29 01:36:03 2007 xorg-server-1.4_3,1
Nov 29 01:42:21 2007 wxgtk2-2.6.3_5
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:26:11 -0500 Jerry McAllister wrote:
the hitler example remain with it because it establishes
a very strong case-in-point example.
Yep, shoot someone and then say -- hey, that's the best example of
what shouldn't be done!
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research
Hi
While running make installworld my computer crashed. (FreeBSD 6.2-p9 kernel)
At this moment the system misses some of the elf libs. Running in single user
mode and running make installworld again gives all kind of errors
Any leads to solve this problem??
Jack
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:14:30 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Fundamentally, you have to be educated to understand it. FreeBSD
is first and formost, for the educated computer user.
Ted, you may exchange famous Hitler's quotes with your highly educated
friends, laugh at Hirosima's anecdotes with
dhaneshk k wrote:
Hi fiiends;
I need PDF to Text converter Program in My FreeBSD6.2 Server :
CAn any one please point out is ther a PORT for PDF_to_TEXT conversion OR how
to install this utility .
Any hints most welcome
Thanks in Advance
Dhanesh
My friend,
You already
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:37:24 +0800 Erich Dollansky wrote:
sensorship starts in the mind of the people.
True. That's why:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=www/118284
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP
FreeBSD committer,
Hi fiiends;
I need PDF to Text converter Program in My FreeBSD6.2 Server :
CAn any one please point out is ther a PORT for PDF_to_TEXT conversion OR how
to install this utility .
Any hints most welcome
Thanks in Advance
Dhanesh
Hi,
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:14:30 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Fundamentally, you have to be educated to understand it. FreeBSD
is first and formost, for the educated computer user.
Ted, you may exchange famous Hitler's quotes with your highly educated
friends, laugh
49 matches
Mail list logo
