On Mon, 11 May 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:
Is there a way to sidestep the sysinstall during the
installation process, beyond selecting the 'location' ?
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0 200905 i386 snapshot DVD and looking
for an approach to drive the entire installation from the
Fixit# command line
On Sun, 10 May 2009, James Phillips wrote:
--- On Mon, 5/11/09, Saifi Khan saifi.k...@twincling.org wrote:
From: Saifi Khan saifi.k...@twincling.org
Subject: Unable to find device node for /dev/ad4s1b in /dev !
To: freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions
On 11/5/09 11:48, Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi all:
Is there a way to sidestep the sysinstall during the
installation process, beyond selecting the 'location' ?
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0 200905 i386 snapshot DVD and looking
for an approach to drive the entire installation from the
Fixit# command line
Hello,
We've got a Sun server E250 with a disk array Storedge A1000. We'd like
to have Freebsd running on it. I see from the
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/hardware-sparc64.html#AEN30
that freebsd runs on E250, but it is not clear for me whether it
supports the disk array. Would you
Hi,
I'm new with FreeBSD setup. Just want to as if Core 2 Duo processor
compatible with FreeBSD.
Thanks a lot..
--
Renato A. Rocabo
mobile: 09208095152
email: cserge...@gmail.com
ym: carlos_serge...@yahoo.com
skype: rrocabo
If you don't write it down, then it never happen
I'm new with FreeBSD setup. Just want to as if Core 2 Duo processor
compatible with FreeBSD.
yes it is.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
PerryH-2 wrote:
There are no USB devices connected. I think those must actually
be atapci1 interrupts, since irq9 is where dmesg reported it.
I think this could be related to previous issues on same topic. I don't
recall the thread titles, but the solution is located here:
Hello,
can I run 64 bit Linux applications on FreeBSD/amd64? Or is Linux
emulation 32 bit only?
Thanks and best regards
Konrad
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheu...@gwdg.de
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 20:56:01 +0100
From: cwhi...@onetel.com
To: socke...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 7.2-release and xorg
firak jotawski wrote:
hi sirs,
apologized me for disturbing the list but i really have problem, X -config
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 04:49:27PM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote:
I often use make -DBATCH install to install ports.
Problem: many ports spew out a warning/todo message after you install
them (eg, you must manually create an x user or something).
Since ports install recursively, I miss most of
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 11/5/09 11:48, Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi all:
Is there a way to sidestep the sysinstall during the
installation process, beyond selecting the 'location' ?
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0 200905 i386 snapshot DVD and looking
for an approach to drive
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:45:03PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:
Is there a way to sidestep the sysinstall during the
installation process, beyond selecting the 'location' ?
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0 200905 i386 snapshot DVD and looking
for an
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:52:39AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kelly Jones wrote:
I often use make -DBATCH install to install ports.
Problem: many ports spew out a warning/todo message after you install
them (eg, you must manually create an x user or something).
Since ports install
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Renato A. Rocabo cserge...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm new with FreeBSD setup. Just want to as if Core 2 Duo processor
compatible with FreeBSD.
Thanks a lot..
--
Renato A. Rocabo
mobile: 09208095152
email: cserge...@gmail.com
ym:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:45:03PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:
Is there a way to sidestep the sysinstall during the
installation process, beyond selecting the 'location' ?
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0
Hi,
i have 2 servers running FreeBSD 7.1 on IBM 3550.
I configured 2 carp: internal and external carps.
Internal carp is working fine, but external one are MASTER on both servers.
Trinity# cat rc.conf|grep carp
cloned_interfaces=carp0 carp1
ifconfig_carp1=up 10.100.0.119/24 vhid 2 pass
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:
Unknown giant
i still wonder why a snapshot should have a dysfunctional installer ?
stable slice and partition support is key to trying or helping
or contributing towards testing/coding for an evolving unknown
giant. Oh well :)
I think you're missing
Hi all:
The system has just one SATA disk and yet bootloader process
identified it as 'ad4'. Ideally, it should be ad1.
Here is the PCI information
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and
945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:27 +0100, RAUL H C LOPES wrote:
Hello,
We've got a Sun server E250 with a disk array Storedge A1000. We'd like
to
Try a LiveCD on it? Also, does the Storedge A1000 require a special
RAID controller or does it appear on the onboard HBA as a logical
volume?
In my
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Putting out a monthly snapshot is nice and if the people are
going to not find info about 'Fixit#' and commands in the
legendary handbook, that is not very helpful.
FreeBSD doesn't work this way, you are trying to fit FreeBSD into your
I am currently running FBSD RELEASE-7.2. I have updated the system using
freebsd-update, ran portsnap fetch update to update all ports, and then
ran portupgrade to upgrade all installed ports to their current
versions. Yet, I am unable to compile hal; I get an error message
On Monday 11 May 2009 21:38:50 Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi all:
The system has just one SATA disk and yet bootloader process
identified it as 'ad4'. Ideally, it should be ad1.
[snip]
How does the labelling logic work ?
FreeBSD reserves numbers for devices that aren't currently connected, so that
You may want to become familiar with:
#
# The following options are valid on the ATA driver:
#
# ATA_STATIC_ID:controller numbering is static ie depends on
location
# else the device numbers are dynamically
allocated.
options ATA_STATIC_ID
Long time
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 04:30:23PM +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Monday 11 May 2009 21:38:50 Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi all:
The system has just one SATA disk and yet bootloader process
identified it as 'ad4'. Ideally, it should be ad1.
[snip]
How does the labelling logic work ?
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:47:52AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
One thing that did not cross my mind prior was regarding the comments
Chad made, use in media other than within the programming scope itself.
I think that's an important consideration that most programmers overlook.
One of the
By default, ATA disks are assigned numbers based on the ATA controller
they are on, and whether they are primary or secondary on the
controller. For example, the primary disk on the first controller would
be ad0, the secondary disk on the first controller would be ad1, the
primary disk on the
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
Your BIOS is reporting two IDE interfaces, each of which could have a master
and slave disk drive, so ad0-3 are reserved for those four drives, meaning
SATA starts at ad4.
Some BIOSes let you change this.
Or you can
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:27 +0100, RAUL H C LOPES wrote:
Hello,
We've got a Sun server E250 with a disk array Storedge A1000. We'd like
to
Try a LiveCD on it? Also, does the Storedge A1000 require a special
RAID controller or does it appear on the onboard
Hi all:
Trying to install the 'boot0' boot manager on the MBR, from the
Fixit# command prompt as
Fixit# boot0cfg -v -B -o noupdate /dev/ad4
the response is:
boot0cfg: write_mbr: /dev/ad4: Operation not permitted.
i've configured a single slice for the entire disk as
Fixit# fdisk -B -I /dev/ad4
Anyone know how do i 'force' a carp to be backup?
I set a advskew higher than the master but it comes up as master.
;(
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: segunda-feira,
Hi,
I had a short look on google for this parameters, and from my
understanding the NFS diskless client is using the informations out of
it to set the appropriate settings on the network interface.
So no luck when supplying them as kernel parameters.
Oh and btw I'm not sure how to setup kernel
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:27:34PM +, Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi all:
Trying to install the 'boot0' boot manager on the MBR, from the
Fixit# command prompt as
Fixit# boot0cfg -v -B -o noupdate /dev/ad4
the response is:
boot0cfg: write_mbr: /dev/ad4: Operation not permitted.
i've
Hi,
I was wondering whether you would like to link to my site
http://www.betflip.com from your page?
http://www.opennet.ru/docs/handbook/hw-configs.html
We provide the latest information about free bets and bonuses from UK
Bookmakers, and think it would be a useful resource for your readers.
On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:19:25 +0100
RAUL H C LOPES rlo...@cern.ch wrote:
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:27 +0100, RAUL H C LOPES wrote:
Hello,
We've got a Sun server E250 with a disk array Storedge A1000. We'd
like to
Try a LiveCD on it? Also, does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Saifi Khan wrote:
| Hi all:
Hi Saifi,
| Trying to write a partition table using fdisk supplied in the
| installation DVD of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 200905 snapshot.
|
| Should we write new partition table ? [n] y
| fdisk: Class not found
|
| When i again
On Mon 2009-05-11 23:17:09 UTC+0930, Daniel O'Connor (docon...@gsoft.com.au)
wrote:
Recreating a disk - slice/parttion/newfs - is one of the main things
to do under a fixit. You should have fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs
there as well as restore for sucking dumps back in.
Depends what sort
Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Martin Turgeon free...@optiksecurite.com:
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to build a new dedicated MySQL server. I will be using
FreeBSD 7.2-REL. My plan is to jail the latest version of MySQL 5.0 and
to put the MySQL data outside the jail. My objective is to
In response to Martin Turgeon free...@optiksecurite.com:
Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Martin Turgeon free...@optiksecurite.com:
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to build a new dedicated MySQL server. I will be using
FreeBSD 7.2-REL. My plan is to jail the latest version of MySQL
When you install freeBSD via sysinstall you could switch to VT2 which
displays what files it is currently installing and you could switch to
VT4 which displays some kind of prompt. What exactly is that prompt? sh?
What utilities does it have access to? When would you want to use it?
--
Eitan
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Eitan Adler eitanadlerl...@gmail.comwrote:
When you install freeBSD via sysinstall you could switch to VT2 which
displays what files it is currently installing and you could switch to
VT4 which displays some kind of prompt. What exactly is that prompt? sh?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 14:19, Martin Turgeon wrote:
Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Martin Turgeon free...@optiksecurite.com:
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to build a new dedicated MySQL server. I will be
using FreeBSD 7.2-REL. My plan is to jail the latest version of
MySQL 5.0 and to put
On Mon, May 11, 2009 14:19, Martin Turgeon wrote:
Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Martin Turgeon free...@optiksecurite.com:
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to build a new dedicated MySQL server. I will be
using FreeBSD 7.2-REL. My plan is to jail the latest version of
MySQL 5.0 and to put
Saifi Khan wrote:
The system has just one SATA disk and yet bootloader process
identified it as 'ad4'. Ideally, it should be ad1.
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller
(rev 01)
00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family) SATA
andrew clarke wrote:
On Mon 2009-05-11 23:17:09 UTC+0930, Daniel O'Connor (docon...@gsoft.com.au)
wrote:
A holographic shell won't have it, but the others will.
That reminds me...
Can someone explain to me why it's called a holographic shell?
It's an 'emergency holographic shell'
Saifi Khan wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Putting out a monthly snapshot is nice and if the people are
going to not find info about 'Fixit#' and commands in the
legendary handbook, that is not very helpful.
FreeBSD doesn't work this way, you are trying to fit
On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:11:08 -0400
Michael Powell nightre...@verizon.net wrote:
-Stable is where newer software from -Current (HEAD) is merged
backwards. An example would be a driver bug that was fixed in
8.0-Current would be made available in 7.2-Stable. The main purpose
for using -Stable
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Where's the 600 MB gone to?
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
In response to Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com:
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Really? This question has been asked a gazillion times ...
Where's the 600 MB gone to?
i386 arch can only see 4G total, but much hardware reserves the
last 500M or so for special hardware
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 5/8/09, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote:
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 5/7/09, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote:
In the meantime I've tried the three possible drivers (XP, NT and an
unlabelled one). I've also installed a recent 8-current snapshot,
updated
I'm new with FreeBSD setup. Just want to as if Core 2 Duo processor
compatible with FreeBSD.
yes. FreeBSD/amd64
Thanks a lot..
--
Renato A. Rocabo
mobile: 09208095152
email: cserge...@gmail.com
ym: carlos_serge...@yahoo.com
skype: rrocabo
If you don't write it down, then it never
isn't it external disk array connected with SCSI connector?
if so - it looks like SCSI disk(s) to the computer and is supported by
FreeBSD disk driver
On Mon, 11 May 2009, RAUL H C LOPES wrote:
Hello,
We've got a Sun server E250 with a disk array Storedge A1000. We'd like to
have Freebsd
Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD
system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Peter Steele pste...@maxiscale.com wrote:
Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD
system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work?
Search the archives. The question of Wake-on-LAN has been around for a
On Monday, May 11, 2009, at 01:25PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
In response to Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com:
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Really? This question has been asked a gazillion times ...
Agreeing with Bill Moran:
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Michel Di Croci wrote:
When I boot, it takes about 5 mins before being up and running. Since it's
my first FreeBSD, I didn't thought there was an issue, but I think there's
one ;)
I have a P4 2.8 HT which is too bad computer and I really think the issue is
in freeBSD and
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I'm new with FreeBSD setup. Just want to as if Core 2 Duo processor
compatible with FreeBSD.
yes. FreeBSD/amd64
Or i386.
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the
NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has no
Wake-on-LAN driver support, hence, no host running FreeBSD has Wake-on-LAN
capabilities.
I'm shocked that the Intel NICs don't have
yes. FreeBSD/amd64
Or i386.
if you want limited system - yes
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD
system?
wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is
powered up - as it's made to power up computer by LAN
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts
the NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has
isn't it BIOS option?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Putting out a monthly snapshot is nice and if the people are
going to not find info about 'Fixit#' and commands in the
legendary handbook, that is not very helpful.
FreeBSD doesn't work this way, you
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
yes. FreeBSD/amd64
Or i386.
if you want limited system - yes
If by 'limited' you mean being able to use nVidia drivers, that's not
very 'limited' to me.
--
Glen Barber
Have you tried: freebsd-update IDS ? I am assuming you did the
freebsd-update to update the machine but if not maybe run through
mergemaster and another rebuild of the world and kernel to make sure that
none of the files got an error from the build.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM,
After unsuccessfully trying to reformat my external harddrive on my
linux machine, I'm trying to reformat the disk in FreeBSD. Frankly, I
just don't know how to do that. Please help me get the disk back to
working order; I don't need to keep any data that is currently on the
disk.
The command
$
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD
system?
wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is
powered up - as it's made to power up computer
--On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the
last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode
the NIC gets set to and then the ACPI shuts the power off.
Without this mode, the
Am Montag, den 11.05.2009, 19:11 -0400 schrieb Glen Barber:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
yes. FreeBSD/amd64
Or i386.
if you want limited system - yes
If by 'limited' you mean being able to use nVidia drivers, that's not
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa
ulr...@pukruppa.net wrote:
If by 'limited' you mean being able to use nVidia drivers, that's not
very 'limited' to me.
Please do correct me:
Only Graphic Cards by nVidia are a problem on amd64, everything else can
be run via OpenSource
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.comwrote:
--On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the
last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Saifi Khan wrote:
| Hi all:
Hi Saifi,
| Trying to write a partition table using fdisk supplied in the
| installation DVD of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 200905 snapshot.
|
| Should we write new partition
70 matches
Mail list logo
