Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 21/01/2012 10:25, Christer Solskogen wrote:
I've just finished installing FreeBSD on my new Mac mini G4 ...
If that's not an Intel based Mac, then your definition of new is,
well, contrary to all accepted usage.
s/new/newly acquired/
On 01/22/12 17:45, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:09:52PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/22/12 17:02, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:43:13PM +, RW wrote:
I was just wondering what would have happened if Apple hadn't backed
clang/LLVM as BSD licensed projects.
Michael Sierchio schreef:
I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX!
It blow chunks. It's a POS. It's crap. It is a joke.
I hope I made myself clear. ;-)
- M
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi!
My system:
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Because pkg_libchk show that Opera 11.60 misses libz.so.5 I want to install
/misc/compat8x as one user suggested me but generic kernel optins are:
# $FreeBSD:
While on the subject of Clang, is this compiler only for C, C++ and Objective-C?
What about Ada and Fortran? Does one need GCC for that? Dragonlace for Ada?
I believe some of the ports require GCC. Many of these ports are developed
primarily for Linux and subsequently ported to FreeBSD ports
On 22/01/2012 11:50, Thomas Mueller wrote:
While on the subject of Clang, is this compiler only for C, C++ and
Objective-C?
Correct. Clang is the LLVM front-end for that family of languages.
What about Ada and Fortran? Does one need GCC for that? Dragonlace
for Ada?
There are other LLVM
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:36:29 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
O.K. I will rebuild a kernel but my question is why is not options for
FreeBSD
8 as default, please?
All the kernel functions present in v8 are also present
in v9, so there is no need to a compatibility option
inside the kernel. The compat-8x
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:06:04PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/22/12 17:45, Chad Perrin wrote:
A couple years ago, it looked like a race between PCC and TenDRA, but
Clang seemed to just come out of nowhere and steal all the attention.
All three of them had a lot to recommend them, but then
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:37:48AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
There has been some talk of it being the GCC replacement for OpenBSD
and maybe even NetBSD, though I seem to recall Theo de Raadt doesn't
consider replacing GCC a very urgent requirement right now (which might
be part of the reason
On 01/22/12 22:37, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:06:04PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/22/12 17:45, Chad Perrin wrote:
A couple years ago, it looked like a race between PCC and TenDRA, but
Clang seemed to just come out of nowhere and steal all the attention.
All three of them had
Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I personally had no idea this was going on; my impression was gcc grew
out of the original compiler that built unix, and the only choices were
borland and gcc. The former for win32 crap and the latter for, well,
everything else.
On 01/23/12 00:38, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Da Rockfreebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I personally had no idea this was going on; my impression was gcc grew
out of the original compiler that built unix, and the only choices were
borland and gcc. The former for win32 crap and the
On Jan 22, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I personally had no idea this was going on; my impression was gcc grew
out of the original compiler that built unix, and the only choices were
borland
Hi,
Reference:
From: Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au
Reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:13:49 +1000
Message-id: 4f1c27ad.9070...@herveybayaustralia.com.au
Da Rock wrote:
On 01/23/12 00:38, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Da
I upgraded to 9.0. But when i use pkg_upgrade -a, i get this:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-release/INDEX: File
unavailable. Why? Also portupgrade -PP -a also fails spectacurly. Why. It
seems like it is getting more and more difficult to use FreeBSD. To upgrade
to the
--As of January 15, 2012 10:09:06 AM -0500, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
is alleged to have said:
I was trying out portmaster to see if it worked better than my current
tool of choice for keeping my ports up to date (portmanager) and when I
went back to portmanager I can no longer get it to
kpn...@pobox.com writes:
Hi,
Lattice C - targeted MS-DOS, AmigaOS, probably others. Had a 32-bit int
on the Amiga, where Manx had a 16-bit int. When Commodore ported BSD sockets
to the Amiga they had to change all the ints to longs because of this. Was
renamed SAS/C towards the end of the
On Jan 22, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
kpn...@pobox.com writes:
Hi,
Lattice C - targeted MS-DOS, AmigaOS, probably others. Had a 32-bit int
on the Amiga, where Manx had a 16-bit int. When Commodore ported BSD sockets
to the Amiga they had to change all the ints to longs because
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:55:18PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/22/12 22:37, Chad Perrin wrote:
PCC (Portable C Compiler), meanwhile, spent many years essentially unused
except in some of the dustier corners of Unix user communities before
being actively developed again as more and more
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:13:49AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/23/12 00:38, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Da Rockfreebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I personally had no idea this was going on; my impression was gcc grew
out of the original compiler that built unix, and the only
Quoth Robert Bonomi on Sunday, 22 January 2012:
Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I personally had no idea this was going on; my impression was gcc grew
out of the original compiler that built unix, and the only choices were
borland and gcc. The former for win32
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:37:48AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
PCC (Portable C Compiler), meanwhile, spent many years essentially unused
PCC is only a C compiler, and there is some C++ code (e.g. groff) in the base
system. The FreeBSD port is marked as i386 and amd64 only, even though other
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
PCC is only a C compiler, and there is some C++ code (e.g. groff) in the base
system. The FreeBSD port is marked as i386 and amd64 only, even though other
architectures seem to be there in the PCC source.
I had somehow forgotten
Hello list,
I'm attempting to install php5 from my ports tree. I've attempted the latest
version ( 5.3.9 located in /usr/ports/lang/php5) and the 'latest stable'
(5.2.17 located in /usr/ports/lang/php52). The result is pretty much the same:
[root@LBSD2:/usr/ports/lang/php5] #make install
===
On 01/23/12 07:26, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
PCC is only a C compiler, and there is some C++ code (e.g. groff) in the base
system. The FreeBSD port is marked as i386 and amd64 only, even though other
architectures seem to be there in the
On 1/22/12 5:35 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hello list,
I'm attempting to install php5 from my ports tree. I've attempted the latest
version ( 5.3.9 located in /usr/ports/lang/php5) and the 'latest stable'
(5.2.17 located in /usr/ports/lang/php52). The result is pretty much the same:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:01:29 -0500
Tim Kellers wrote:
On 1/22/12 5:35 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hello list,
I'm attempting to install php5 from my ports tree. I've attempted
the latest version ( 5.3.9 located in /usr/ports/lang/php5) and the
'latest stable' (5.2.17 located in
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Samuel Wallace wrote:
uname -a
FreeBSD sampc.att.com 8.2-STABLE #4: Sun Jan 15 13:21:40 EST 2012
s...@sampc.att.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
[buildworld: don't know how to make iterator.cc]
There's a thread about this on stable@. The net outcome seems to be,
Hello again,
Thanks for your input. Before attempting to install php on this machine I
updated my ports tree with csvsup. But following the steps in this article
helped me to get past this point.
http://icesquare.com/wordpress/freebsdproblem-to-update-php-port/
Which was basically:
#sudo rm
On 01/23/12 10:50, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks for your input. Before attempting to install php on this machine I
updated my ports tree with csvsup. But following the steps in this article
helped me to get past this point.
On 1/22/12 7:50 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks for your input. Before attempting to install php on this machine I
updated my ports tree with csvsup. But following the steps in this article
helped me to get past this point.
On Jan 21, 2012, at 1:41 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 01/20/2012 09:02 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
Taking a GENERIC 9.0-RELEASE kernel and running kgzip(8) on it produces an
unusable kernel which causes immediate BTX halt in loader(8).
...
4. Say: kgzip kernel
Curious, it doesn't even
Le Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:42:10 -0700,
Dale Scott dalesc...@shaw.ca a écrit :
# mount
/dev/ada0p2 on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel)
/dev/ad1as1d on /backup (ufs, local, soft-updates)
#
# cd /backup
# dump -0aLf 20120118.dump /
There is no
33 matches
Mail list logo
