On Friday 06 February 2009 02:55, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I think you should be able to do it with a combination of -prune and
-delete (or -exec rm -rf {} \; ) on a find command. Substitute your
other commands for rm -rf in the -exec above.
I would give you a working example except I can't
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Friday 06 February 2009 02:55, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I think you should be able to do it with a combination of -prune and
-delete (or -exec rm -rf {} \; ) on a find command. Substitute your
other commands for rm -rf in the -exec above.
I would give you a working
Jaime wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, t-u-t marshc...@gmail.com wrote:
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any said function like cp, mv, rm, etc.. , to all
other files except that one or two, is there a way to do that in a
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Jaime wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, t-u-t marshc...@gmail.com wrote:
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many
others,
and i want to perform any said function like cp, mv, rm, etc.. , to all
other files except that one or two, is there
hi, i don't know if this is a freak question, but i was looking around to
see if this is possible, and what the convention would be.
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any said function like cp, mv, rm, etc.. , to all
other files
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, t-u-t wrote:
hi, i don't know if this is a freak question, but i was looking around to
see if this is possible, and what the convention would be.
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any said function like cp, mv,
In the last episode (Feb 04), t-u-t said:
hi, i don't know if this is a freak question, but i was looking around to
see if this is possible, and what the convention would be.
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any said function
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.comwrote:
In general this is not possible. A few commands have exclusion options,
but
not many. Some shells have ways of managing glob exclusion (it's the shell
that expands wildcard patterns). Setting GLOBIGNORE works in
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
zsh has the ^ and ~ glob metacharacters that are enabled with you enable
EXTENDED_GLOB:
^x (Requires EXTENDED_GLOB to be set.) Matches anything except
the pattern x. This has a higher
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:35:52PM +0100, t-u-t wrote:
hi, i don't know if this is a freak question, but i was looking around to
see if this is possible, and what the convention would be.
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, t-u-t marshc...@gmail.com wrote:
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many others,
and i want to perform any said function like cp, mv, rm, etc.. , to all
other files except that one or two, is there a way to do that in a single
command?
Lars Eighner wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, t-u-t wrote:
hi, i don't know if this is a freak question, but i was looking
around to
see if this is possible, and what the convention would be.
if i have say one (or even two) single file/directories among many
others,
and i want to perform any
12 matches
Mail list logo
