On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:58:34AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer...
Great!
But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex)
still doesn't persist across a reboot :(
That's a bug; I think it might be related to
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:38:29PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that
vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for
vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum
commands
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 12:17:21AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion
then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems
in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the
current documentation
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:04:57PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
Whatever you do, don't complain about it on this list, or you'll just be
told that if you really wanted raid, you should be running SCSI disks
and a raid adapter. They may allow that 3ware does ok, but no ATA drive
should ever be
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the
current documentation and the discussions about it now, I don't want to
risk it.
IMHO it's pretty stable in 6.0. I've been running gvinum RAID-5 for a
while
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:23AM +, Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2005-11-29 10:19:17+, Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes:
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 at 11:17:41 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the [Dell] warrenty... I'm hard on equipment and I depend on my
equipment. I've been
Hi,
First: do _NOT_ use vinum on 5.4, use gvinum.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:43:01PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
I am still struggling to set up a one way mirror on two 72GB disks on
5.4 intel platform, however, there seems to be a lot of confusion about
what to use in the first place. this is
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Did you start from scratch by wiping the former configuration without loading
gvinum?
Use
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=1m count=128
to be sure. Do this WITHOUT loading any of the vinum modules.
:( Forgot to add a big fat
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:20:47PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
I thought I could check previous gvinum config with the gvinum list
command in its own shell. When I run this command for either gvinum or
vinum, they both reported no volumes.
You should be able to use the list command to view the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:27:28PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm also interested in fixing the omnipresent nve-problems, but reading
the manpages for nve(4) reveals the bad circumstance that this driver
seems to be 'wrapped' around a Linux binary object. Nvidia obviously
isn't willing to
Hi,
I have a server set up to boot from a gvinum mirror volume. This was
all working fine, so I then proceeded to load my data on it, safe in
the knowledge that all was well.
However, all was not well after the last reboot: it seems that while
the two ATA disks probe, for some odd reason GEOM
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:11:52PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The ipw and iwi drivers (at least) have never worked right so far as
I can tell. At one point I tried the iwi driver and it kinda worked
but failed in many common scenarios and in
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:27:13AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Fri, April 15, 2005 5:13 am, Ulrik Guenther said:
on my 5.4-RC1 installation with a 3com 3c905B NIC I got the following
messages while transferring a big file (31GByte) over 100MBit ethernet:
Apr 15 08:46:18 verleihnix
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08:26AM +1030, Tristan wrote:
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
You need to use gvinum on 5-STABLE and -CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, it would be wise to update to
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:44:10PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
After a long and happy time with vinum under 4.8 - 4.10, I'm finding
things very broken in 5.3. The config I'm trying to accomplish is
relatively simple, just a root mirrored volume configuration which worked
under 4.x.
A
Hi,
I downgraded a machine from 5-CURRENT to 4-STABLE this morning, so I tried
to get me a new include directory after the installworld by doing
# cd /usr
# mv include include.old
# mkdir include
# cd src
# make installincludes
Which went okay, but my new build of ports/www/phoenix failed due
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Stijn Hoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is with PERL_VERSION=5.8.0 in /etc/make.conf, and no /usr/bin/perl
(since this is -CURRENT), which is why mkhtmlindex barfs.
use.perl port
Noted, thanks. I thought this was only
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:05:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Dec, Emiel Kollof wrote:
* Stijn Hoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I might be the first to have noticed. What if suddenly 20 more people in
the span of the next 24 hours report that X or X apps won't build
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM +, Tarquin McDowell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Anyone getting any better results? Is there something I can do to fix
this? The drivers are of no use to me if they are this unreliable.
More info available
Hi,
for those interested I've just submitted a port that compiles and installs
the NVIDIA driver for you.
See PR ports/45988,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=45988
Anybody is welcome to improve upon this version, it works for me as is
and I won't have the time to maintain this in
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:23:04PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
If it is any consolation: Philips CDRW drives die anyway. One for me,
and 2 for 2 friends, all early deads with low mileage.
Add another one to that list :( Burned roughly 100 CDs in 1 year...
--Stijn
--
] Nothing safer than a
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:40:45PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
Guys, there seems to be being an explosive growth in the size of the
CVS repository.
When I first started keeping a local copy, it was about 800meg. Now
on my system it's almost run itself out of a 3GB partition. Is
there
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Jamie Norwood wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:43:27AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
That seems a little dangerous - perhaps some of the files will have
md5 appearing in other lines for other reasons, and that would mess
Read 'CHECKSUM'
Hi,
I recently installed a new machine for testing NFS mounts. Things worked
great, so I went to attend to other things. I tested the NFS mounts with
my work machine as the server. Now I regularly upgrade my work machine, so it
gets reboot every couple of days. I forgot that the client still had
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:35:44PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stijn Hoop writes:
Now, I know for sure that I only had /usr/ports mounted during the time.
And I think it's very strange that the daily security check would fail
to mail me when a mount of /usr/ports
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
Tomorrow I'm going to install a stable snaphot on a client's box. I've
seen some issues lately in the list. All of which seem to have been
resolved lately. I'm wondering if I should be going for 4.2-20010306-
STABLE or
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:33:11PM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
I'm on tangent mode this afternoon, so this is not a direct reply.
[excellent explanation that makes perfect sense snipped for brevity]
Even if there's nothing else gained by this discussion, can this
28 matches
Mail list logo
