of the box for Joe Beerbelly.
--
Henri Asseily
henri.tel
On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
I think that the mistake being made most on this mailing list is the
tendency to devise solutions to complicated problems. Sadly, this is
just not a thing that can be done on a mailing list
Well it could even be an e-mail with webfinger resolution.
IMO webfinger is a horrible overengineered exceedingly complicated
pseudo-solution. E-mail addresses aren't under the control of the owner.
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
+1
I don't use github, and the FreedomBox project might gain in visibility by
having its own git hosting. Projects related to this one would all be in
one place, easy to find, rather than spread everywhere. Might be alioth'
git hosting, but it requires to have access to it.
What about
Now, the idea of FBox has evolved into something which has mesh
networking (even not requiring DNS), has anonymisation as well as
serving as a separate 'Internet'. While there is no doubt that these
ideas are interesting and useful, there should be a progression of
stages through which the
, the idea of having an abstracted single access point
solves many problems, chiefly storing config and or runtime data in the cloud
without being subordinated to a 3rd party (i.e. having 0 switching costs), or
subordinated to any one protocol.
--
Henri Asseily
henri.tel
