On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 03:59:39 -0400 (EDT), pa...@lavabit.com wrote:
If you blog about FreedomBox, we'd love to include you. Just shoot me
an email. Best regards, James
Hi,
is it possible even if something about FreedomBox is blogged in a language
different than english (e.g. italian)?
On 06/30/2011 01:27 PM, Mike Warren wrote:
I think one of the gold nuggets of information is the social graph
itself: who you know and how much you communicate with these people,
which is quite valuable even if the contents are encrypted. So, it
would seem to make sense to me to use Tor for
i...@churchkey.org i...@churchkey.org wrote:
On 06/30/2011 01:27 PM, Mike Warren wrote:
I think one of the gold nuggets of information is the social graph
itself: who you know and how much you communicate with these people,
which is quite valuable even if the contents are encrypted. So, it
We can do it like Facebook. Everybody friends your profile
and you manually group them. The grouping is private in that
your friends don't know what groups they're in (and most of
the time, even if they've been grouped at all).
At the time you friend (connect) a profile instead of Accept you
Hi all,
I'm asking my friends designers to join this group and help us shape the
user experience of FreedomBox. The message I'm sending them is more or
less the following. If you know user experience designers, feel free to
adapt the text below when you contact them.
Cheers,
stef
Dear name
At
please, take a look on XMPP initiatives for federated social staff
with security and privacy in mind.
XMPP is very flexible and mature stack of protocols, and, with all
respect, we'll need the flexibility.
i'll repost:
http://primarypad.com/OeMj2ZnZqo list,
there are - enough projects in various
because cisco bought it ?
that's only - one, small, outcome ;)
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
... The same principle exist between a reporter and a
whistleblower. The pseudonymity article suggests the technology exists to
protect freedom fighters through unlinkable pseudonyms.
It's important, I think, to be able to extend the web of trust to
people we can identify and trust, not just
Damn meant to change to subject line... did not mean so
hijack the thread...
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Tony Godshall t...@of.net wrote:
... The same principle exist between a reporter and a
whistleblower. The pseudonymity article suggests the technology exists to
protect freedom
