Sion wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Sion wrote:
I've also tried outer.reply, but I'm still not seeing it show up in my logs.
sigh And the debug log says... ?
Just set use_tunneled_reply = yes
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Nasser Heidari wrote:
I've done it in test environment , problem is that same configuration is
not working in heavy load.
If NAS does not send MAC address , I update request with a
.. mac , but in production environment, users who does not
have mac address , RADIUS request updates
What seems to be happening here:
When passing variables to the perl module,
void fr_print_string(const char *in, size_t inlen, char *out, size_t outlen)
Escapes all special characters (including '\')
When variables are returned from perl,
VALUE_PAIR *pairparsevalue(VALUE_PAIR *vp, const char
Murray Long wrote:
When passing variables to the perl module,
void fr_print_string(const char *in, size_t inlen, char *out, size_t outlen)
Escapes all special characters (including '\')
Yes.
When variables are returned from perl,
VALUE_PAIR *pairparsevalue(VALUE_PAIR *vp, const char
That switch statement has no condition for *cp == \\. Which is what
I have added. (Please see patch attached to my previous message)
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Murray Long wrote:
When passing variables to the perl module,
void
Hello,
I hope this is not too Off Topic, but I am looking for a company with
FreeRADIUS expertise for a substantial Project in Switzerland ?
Would greatly appreciate it if someone could recommend a reliable and competent
partner for this.
Regards
Oliver Steudler
steudler (at) netcloud (dot)
Hi Alex
Thank you for the help. I am now able to authenticate users from both
windows xp(2) and windows 7 using PEAP authentication type. But in Windows
Vista I have a problem. Initially I am able to authenticate from windows
vista but after some time its diconnects itself. I have to disable the
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Sion wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
wrote:
Sion wrote:
I've also tried outer.reply, but I'm still not seeing it show up in my
logs.
sigh And the debug log says... ?
--On Tuesday, September 07, 2010 14:11:42 +0100 Sion mle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
wrote:
Sion wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
wrote:
Sion wrote:
I've also tried outer.reply, but
but it seems the next packet sent is a Challenge, not reject/accept.
Therefore the message does not persist until reject/accept time.
Hmm.. It seems I've heard that before:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-users/2009-August/msg00326.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Murray Long wrote:
That switch statement has no condition for *cp == \\. Which is what
I have added. (Please see patch attached to my previous message)
OK, I didn't see that. I'll look into a fix for 2.1.10.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi Folks,
I'm running into some very bad issue: when running freeradius in threaded mode
(default)
it's mixing up CONCURRENT requests resulting in a wrong vlan assignment.
Here are the logs of two clients (OSX and Ubuntu). The Ubuntu supplicant
(wpa-suppl.)
always fails the first login try,
homyang cha homyan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the help. I am now able to authenticate users from both
windows xp(2) and windows 7 using PEAP authentication type. But in Windows
Vista I have a problem. Initially I am able to authenticate from windows
vista but after some time its
Garber, Neal wrote:
but it seems the next packet sent is a Challenge, not reject/accept.
Therefore the message does not persist until reject/accept time.
Hmm.. It seems I've heard that before:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-users/2009-August/msg00326.html
Fixed in 2.1.9.
Jan Zacharias wrote:
I'm running into some very bad issue: when running freeradius in
threaded mode (default)
it's mixing up CONCURRENT requests resulting in a wrong vlan assignment.
That sounds bad.
Now let's check what Vlans got assigned (this is the vmps log, vmps gets
only this MAC
Version is radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.9, for host i386-portbld-freebsd8.1,
built on Aug 5 2010 at 14:17:48
rad2vmps is part of freenac. Can freerad and freenac work w/a this thing in
between out of the box?! That would be great!
Maybe I should post full debug output of freerad, but
Jan Zacharias wrote:
Version is radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.9, for host
i386-portbld-freebsd8.1, built on Aug 5 2010 at 14:17:48
Maybe the Perl installation on your system isn't thread-safe. This is
possible...
rad2vmps is part of freenac. Can freerad and freenac work w/a this thing
Fixed in 2.1.9.
Great (I guess missed that in the change log). Was the change to eliminate the
extra round trip? If so, would you accept a patch to set
Module-Failure-Message upon failure of ntlm_auth in rlm_mschap (as was
originally implemented in the fix for bug 398 in v1.1.4)?
Thanks
Garber, Neal wrote:
Fixed in 2.1.9.
Great (I guess missed that in the change log). Was the change to eliminate
the extra round trip?
IIRC, it was to remember replies better. When the inner tunnel
returns accept and the outer sends a challenge... remember the accept
for later.
If so,
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 21:19 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the pre-release of 2.1.10, especially
the changes to the proxy code.
We have been running 3 servers with 2.1.10 (taken from git a while ago)
for some time with no problems. They act as a proxy, receiving
John Horne wrote:
We have been running 3 servers with 2.1.10 (taken from git a while ago)
The proxy change went in August 4.
for some time with no problems. They act as a proxy, receiving requests
from wireless lan controllers and (mostly) proxying them on to MS IAS.
Is there any
Alan Buxey wrote:
Please test it out, and give feedback on issues / benefits. The file
doc/ChangeLog contains all of the changes and new features in the server.
fails to compile on older redhats with python :
Huh? Did 2.1.9 compile on those versions of Redhat? The last change
to the
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 22:26 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Horne wrote:
We have been running 3 servers with 2.1.10 (taken from git a while ago)
The proxy change went in August 4.
Ah. Our versions date back to June. I'll see about upgrading them to a
later 2.1.10 version. (Hopefully that
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 22:28 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Alan Buxey wrote:
Please test it out, and give feedback on issues / benefits. The file
doc/ChangeLog contains all of the changes and new features in the server.
fails to compile on older redhats with python :
What version of
I'll take a look...
Thanks.
I'd like to get some feedback on the pre-release of 2.1.10,
especially the changes to the proxy code.
I'll download the latest 2.1.10 tomorrow; unfortunately, I won't have a chance
to test it until next week. Also, we don't use proxying, at the moment, but I
IIRC, it was to remember replies better. When the inner tunnel
returns accept and the outer sends a challenge... remember the
accept for later.
I just cloned and built the latest 2.1.10 to do some testing. I did a
PEAP-MSCHAPv2 authentication, with bad credentials, using eapol_test. What
26 matches
Mail list logo
