On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 22:03, Phil Mayers opined:
PM:Carefully examine the two entries on line 1 and 172, determine what's
PM:different, examine the unredacted data in the packets, and correct it.
hi phil - thanks for the advice, i figured out that placement of the
$INCLUDE statement (and
Hi!
Our setup utilizes custom SQL schemas and functions for authentication and
authorization.
We now want to add a roaming proxy for a certain realm.
When a user logs in using this realm, our custom SQL authorization should be
skipped because our functions and the roaming proxy are completely
Dear, I'm advancing in the Freeradius + AD authenticationjust a
short question: when I want to make the eapol_test tool, I get this
error:
# make eapol_test
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnl
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [eapol_test] Error 1
I've followed all the steps to
paul trader wrote:
hi phil - thanks for the advice, i figured out that placement of the
$INCLUDE statement (and user info in general) in the users file is
important for windows authentication. strangely enough, it doesn't seem
to matter for a linux dialup, though.
That is a *terrible*
On 24/09/13 12:25, JB wrote:
At first glance, this seems to work but I wanted to know if there's a
better or more common way to achieve this. Or is this completely
stupid after all? (Why?)
Looks fine to me; you're conditionally executing the rest of your policy
based on earlier results.
-
Roberto Carna wrote:
Dear, I'm advancing in the Freeradius + AD authenticationjust a
short question: when I want to make the eapol_test tool, I get this
error:
# make eapol_test
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnl
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [eapol_test] Error 1
On 09/24/2013 10:16 AM, Roberto Carna wrote:
Dear, I'm advancing in the Freeradius + AD authenticationjust a
short question: when I want to make the eapol_test tool, I get this
error:
# make eapol_test
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnl
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: ***
You need the following items on your Debian system to build eapol_test:
libssl-dev, libnl1, libnl-dev
:-)
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-
bounces+stefan.paetow=diamond.ac...@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-
Looking for someone to test some new code (in master branch).
Someone [1] has claimed to of decompiled a SIM validation program to
figure out the algorithms for Comp128-2 and Comp128-3.
The reason why this is particularly useful, is because Comp128-1 is
horribly broken, and versions 2 and 3
Hi everybody
I need some help
I'm new in this topic and I'm traying to configure a freeradius serve.
I followed the instructions to configure freeradius plus remote mysql
server and when put in debug mode freeradius -f -X i get
this message.
rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host
Note: Comp128-4 (milenage) is still unknown (please contact one of the
developers
if you have access to it's specification), but just algorithms 1-3 are still
useful.
Actually it's not, it's published in the 3GGP standards, neat :)
Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org
On 24 Sep 2013, at 18:12, Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org wrote:
Note: Comp128-4 (milenage) is still unknown (please contact one of the
developers
if you have access to it's specification), but just algorithms 1-3 are still
useful.
Actually it's not, it's published in
On 24/09/13 17:58, María Teresa Mondragón Reyes wrote:
rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 192.168.4.224 port 32769,
id=157, length=285
Invalid packet code 4 sent to a proxy port from home server
192.168.4.224 port 32769 - ID 157 : IGNORED
Ready to process requests.
This should be
María Teresa Mondragón Reyes wrote:
I followed the instructions to configure freeradius plus remote mysql
server and when put in debug mode freeradius -f -X i get
this message.
You don't need -f -X. Just -X is good enough.
rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 192.168.4.224 port
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 at 10:36, Alan DeKok opined:
AD: It also contradicts your previous messages. You claimed you put the
AD:users file entry at line one of the file. But now you talk about a
AD:$INCLUDE statement.
AD:
AD: So... which is it?
hi alan - well, i did both. at first the
Or ask your distribution provider why they still provide wpa_supplicant package
without eapol_test tool ;)
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
paul trader wrote:
hi alan - well, i did both. at first the $INCLUDE was put at the bottom
of the users file, and there was 1 entry in the included file, at line 1.
Why do you have a $INCLUDE? You did NOT mention it in your other posts.
The help here presumes that you accurately
17 matches
Mail list logo
