Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-13 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
Is it correct as above? Do I have to call ldap_dhcp separately in each section (i.e. twice)? Hopefully someone else will chime in who's actually used it, but this is what I believe the order of operations should be: * Receive DHCP-Discover - Call LDAP to get the IP assignment for

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-13 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 31/8/2013 12:03 πμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: 1. Is DHCP functionality supported against an LDAP Server (in v2.2.0)? Yes. I am having a hard time trying to adapt the example at: http://wiki.freeradius.org/guide/dhcp-for-static-ip-allocation to work from ldap. We are starting from a

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-13 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 13/9/2013 8:40 μμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: If you do it the way I suggested I highly recommend you use V3.0.0 (release_branch_3.0.0 or master/HEAD) instead, as the list/attribute handling is much better. Thanks, I'll look into rlm_cache. I wonder if anyone in this list has created a

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-13 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 13 Sep 2013, at 19:47, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: On 13/9/2013 9:35 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Where can I find the v3.0.0 source branch? Oh, I found it and it includes a spec file for redhat: https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/tree/release_branch_3.0.0/redhat

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-13 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 13/9/2013 9:35 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Where can I find the v3.0.0 source branch? Oh, I found it and it includes a spec file for redhat: https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/tree/release_branch_3.0.0/redhat Is the spec file in a well-working condition? (I might test, but

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-11 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 31/8/2013 5:57 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: I'll look into DHCP... Looking at the sites-available/dhcp example setup (on v2.2.0) I see that the DHCP code is not production-ready. Based on user feedback and on your involvement with next FreeRadius release(s) development, do you expect the

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-11 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 11 Sep 2013, at 14:49, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: On 31/8/2013 5:57 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: I'll look into DHCP... Looking at the sites-available/dhcp example setup (on v2.2.0) I see that the DHCP code is not production-ready. Based on user feedback and on your

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-11 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 11 Sep 2013, at 15:37, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: On 11/9/2013 5:05 μμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Define production-ready... Production-ready DHCP Server: A DHCP Server that can be used as such in a real-life, mission-critical, organizational environment, i.e. in a network

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-11 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 11/9/2013 5:05 μμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Define production-ready... Production-ready DHCP Server: A DHCP Server that can be used as such in a real-life, mission-critical, organizational environment, i.e. in a network where clients (hosts) will only get an IP address if and only if

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-09-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Nikolaos Milas wrote: My understanding is that the term production system implies the definition above. It's just a warning. If it works for you, it works. Does the reference to code apply to the configuration file only (sites-available/dhcp) or to the DHCP FreeRadius module (as I have

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-31 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 31/8/2013 12:03 πμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: 1. Is DHCP functionality supported against an LDAP Server (in v2.2.0)? Yes. 2. If so, is there a planned freeradius ldap schema change (in future versions) to include DHCP-* attributes? No. But you're welcome to submit a pull request.

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-31 Thread Alan DeKok
Nikolaos Milas wrote: Sorry, I don't know really what a pull request is, but googling info makes me think it means I can submit a proposal for schema changes? If so, I might, after I become a bit acquainted to the DHCP FreeRadius component (and to DHCP in general). A pull request means

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-31 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 31 Aug 2013, at 13:49, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: On 31/8/2013 12:03 πμ, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: 1. Is DHCP functionality supported against an LDAP Server (in v2.2.0)? Yes. 2. If so, is there a planned freeradius ldap schema change (in future versions) to include DHCP-*

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-31 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 31/8/2013 5:27 μμ, Alan DeKok wrote: ... Thank you for your clear answers. I'll look into DHCP and see how I can instruct our Cisco switches send the Framed-IP-Address attribute. Thanks again both for the clarifications and for providing FreeRadius to us. Regards, Nick - List

FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-30 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Hello, A couple of quick questions. 1. Is DHCP functionality supported against an LDAP Server (in v2.2.0)? 2. If so, is there a planned freeradius ldap schema change (in future versions) to include DHCP-* attributes? Please advise. Thanks, Nick - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: FreeRadius DHCP against LDAP

2013-08-30 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 30 Aug 2013, at 19:08, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: Hello, A couple of quick questions. 1. Is DHCP functionality supported against an LDAP Server (in v2.2.0)? Yes. 2. If so, is there a planned freeradius ldap schema change (in future versions) to include DHCP-* attributes?