Phil Mayers wrote:
I'll try to test the Access-Reject thing tomorrow; I'm betting it'll be
a trivial fix.
Thanks.
A 2.1.11 release would be good; we're been running a recent v2.1.x
snapshot in production for a while and it's stable (once I patched the
detail file reader segfault, which I
Hi,
my freeradius works as a proxy, terminates eap and proxy the request
with mschap to another freeradius.
When Passing reply from proxy back into the tunnel the proxy quits
with a segmentation fault.
This happens, with little difference, when sending the accept or reject
back to NAS.
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Simon
Simon L. schrieb:
Hi,
my freeradius works as a proxy, terminates eap and proxy the request
with mschap to
Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Use the v2.1.x branch. It will become 2.1.11 soon.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Alan DeKok schrieb:
Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Use the v2.1.x branch. It will become 2.1.11 soon.
Alan
On 01/06/11 15:45, Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
Simon L. fantasn...@ki.tng.de wrote:
I hope anyone got this before and can give a solution.
Please have a look in my debug log attached.
Going to need some GDB lovin' too.
http://freeradius.org/radiusd/doc/bugs
If you are compiling from source, I recommend you go with the git
version
Phil Mayers wrote:
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
segfault if the remote proxy returns an Access-Reject.
I haven't had time to test this yet.
I'd like to release 2.1.11 soon. Maybe next week?
Alan DeKok.
-
List
On 06/01/2011 07:32 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
segfault if the remote proxy returns an Access-Reject.
I haven't had time to test this yet.
I'd like to release 2.1.11 soon. Maybe next week?
Well
On 06/01/2011 09:00 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
I'll try to test the Access-Reject thing tomorrow; I'm betting it'll be
a trivial fix.
Huh. It works just fine for me on v2.1.x HEAD. I'll try to dig out the
email where someone said it was faulty (IIRC they said they'd emailed
you also Alan). I
10 matches
Mail list logo