Does anyone know of any support (i.e. articles/data) suggesting that the V1
and V2 labels automatically created in the Freesurfer pipeline, especially
when looking at surface area/gyrification, are valid to use with clinical
populations? In particular, visually deprived populations?
Thanks!
Hi Krista
I don't think we have any idea. The labels are based purely on anatomy, but
whether those areas keep their functional specification we have no idea.
let us know if you find out though!
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, krista kelly wrote:
Does anyone know of any support (i.e.
OK thanks. I see a lot of pubs using these labels. Can anyone provide any
advice on how to justify using these labels in clinical populations without
also collecting functional retinotopy data?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
Hi Krista
I don't
