Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread Steve Hartwell
on 8/22/2005 10:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great Thank you for important information about the utilization undefined GID. At present, I cannot find Zapfino in my MacOS X (I'm not sure if I did misconfigured installation), so we have not tested the font. Please let me know where I can find

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread mpsuzuki
Dear Mr. Steve Hartwell, On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:04:19 -0700 Steve Hartwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 8/22/2005 10:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot find Zapfino in my MacOS X (I'm not sure if I did misconfigured installation), so we have not tested the font. Please let me know where I

Re: [ft-devel] gxvalid patch for ftvalid.c

2005-08-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
P.S. After moving the FreeType2 cvs repository to savannah(subversions?).gnu.org, I may lose my write-access to it. I'm happy if you give mpsuzuki instead of me to write-access for gxvalid merging tasks. Toshiya-san, Masatake-san, thanks a lot for your work! I've given both of you write

Re: [ft-devel] gxvalid patch for ftvalid.c

2005-08-23 Thread mpsuzuki
Dear Mr. Werner LEMBERG, On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:50:35 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks a lot for your work! I've given both of you write access to the FreeType repository -- please add everything to the CVS; I'll revise it later on. Great Thank you for CVS

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread George Williams
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 23:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As written in README, some of TrueType GX tables (mort, feat, prop) are widely used, others (lcar, opbd) are very rare, and there are a few tables (kern format1) we cannot find samples. I have one example font containing a kern format 1

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread George Williams
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on your detailed analysis (thanks again), I removed the line - state transition diagram uses undefined glyph ID from the essential error list, and add following paragraph into the section. If I'm misunderstanding, please let me

[ft-devel] Bug in autofit render setup

2005-08-23 Thread chris
Hi, While playing font rendering, and trying to figure out while scaling some truetype fonts ends up with the bottom horizontal line of E, L, 2 etc is missing. (75dpi, freetype used as an X server renderer, running on Solaris, so using the Sun provided CourierNew.tff) I believe the fix for is to

Re: [ft-devel] gxvalid patch for ftvalid.c

2005-08-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I will rewrite with GX. How do you think about? This is fine with me. Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

[ft-devel] Can't compile under cygwin

2005-08-23 Thread David Piepgrass
For whatever reason, the makefile doesn't realize it's got a 'unixy' environment. Any guesses what's wrong? [EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/Dev/Mapping/DIBitmaps/freetype2 $ make make: ver: Command not found make: type: Command not found make: *** [dos_setup] Error 127 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread George Williams
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:50, George Williams wrote: a) 14 fonts uses too-large feature number (out of defined range). b) 67 fonts uses feature number which should not be used. c) 117 fonts set wrong feature range (nSetting). this infraction is found in mort/morx.

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread mpsuzuki
Dear Mr. George Williams, On 23 Aug 2005 14:50:54 -0700 George Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 18:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4-5. invalid feature number (117/183) - GX/AAT extension can include 255 different features

Re: [ft-devel] [patch] TrueType GX/AAT validator

2005-08-23 Thread mpsuzuki
Dear Mr. George Williams, Oops, sorry for crossing of paths. On 23 Aug 2005 17:35:12 -0700 George Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So: a) 14 fonts uses too-large feature number (out of defined range). I can't find anything that says the range is a byte, but there may be something I've missed.

Re: [ft-devel] gxvalid patch for ftvalid.c

2005-08-23 Thread mpsuzuki
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:14:10 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will rewrite with GX. How do you think about? This is fine with me. After replacing _TRUETYPEGX_ macros to _GX_, I've just committed whole of gxvalid patch to CVS. Yamato-san, please commit ft2demos patch,