Hi,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:59:38 +0530
Poornima poornim...@jasmin-infotech.com wrote:
We have ported Free Type Font Library (freetype-2.3.11) on fixed point DSP
processor (BF533, 600 MHz) in VDSP Platform.
Basic functionality is working fine. We have got output display in LCD
monitor through
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
FT_Load_Glyph() takes lot of time compared to FT_Get_Char_Index().
Please find the details below.
FT_Get_Char_Index()- It takes around 0.005 ms per character.
FT_Load_Glyph() - It takes around 2.9 ms per character.
Could you please provide your inputs for
We have ported Free Type Font Library (freetype-2.3.11) on fixed
point DSP processor (BF533, 600 MHz) in VDSP Platform.
Basic functionality is working fine. We have got output display in
LCD monitor through HDMI connector.
But the FT_Load_Char() function is taking lot of time to execute
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:49:16 +0530
Poornima poornim...@jasmin-infotech.com wrote:
FT_Load_Glyph() takes lot of time compared to FT_Get_Char_Index().
Thanks.
FT_Get_Char_Index()- It takes around 0.005 ms per character.
FT_Load_Glyph() - It takes around 2.9 ms per character.
Hmm. In next, could
On 02/24/2010 06:19 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Not really. A yes/partial/no answer should be enough.
why do you need a `partial' if there is no possibility to find out
which ranges are hinter or unhinted?
What I want to use this info for is to be able to write configurations that
say if the
On 02/25/2010 05:21 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
No idea about the in-between. That's what I called maybe. But
it's not a very flexible API. Another way would be to get the
number of hinted glyphs. I'm not sure.
Sounds sensible. The arguments could be `start' and `end' of a range
(or
