Werner, except of the code size, do you have any concern
about my patch?
Everything looks fine. However, I have just skimmed it, without
looking too much into the details.
# One of my concern (except of the code size) is that APIs like
# FT_Get_Path_From_Stream() is a bad idea from the
Hi Werner
Thanks alot for the reply. I have looked at your suggestion and tried to
understand how it works.
I have one question regarding this. I understand that after we set env
variable FT2_ALLOC_COUNT_MAX and FT2_DEBUG_MEMORY on runtime, the value for
FT2_ALLOC_COUNT_MAX will be assigned to
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:44:29 +0900
mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
I will post about the code size evaluation.
Here is the result by Linux/i386 gcc-4.4.2.
My patch increases the code size about 1% - 2%.
I think enable-by-default won't blow out most
systems using FreeType2 under default config.
Here is the result by Linux/i386 gcc-4.4.2.
My patch increases the code size about 1% - 2%.
This is more than I have expected.
I think enable-by-default won't blow out most systems using
FreeType2 under default config.
OK. However, it would be nice if it is surrounded by
FT_CONFIG_...
Does the above check aim to bound memory allocation to up to
table-alloc_total_max? If that is the case, should the check be the
following instead:
if ( table-bound_total
table-alloc_total_max - table-alloc_current (FT_ULong)size )
Werner,
Now I'm reworking my patch to provide a single generic
interface like this:
/*/
/* */
/* Function
On 03/15/2010 01:44 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:19:44 -0400
Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 03/11/2010 02:47 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
Attached (get-stream-info.diff) is a revised patch with
a feature to get the info about the origin
On 03/15/2010 08:36 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
FT_EXPORT( FT_Error )
FT_Object_Get_Property( FT_Librarylibrary,
FT_Pointerobject,
const char* object_type,
const char*
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:55:52 -0400
Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
In another note, since you seem to be writing a lot of FreeType patches
recently, it doesn't hurt to ask: have you ever considered implementing
reference counts for FreeType?
I remember you had ever mentioned the lack of
On 03/15/2010 11:43 PM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
However, yet I've not figured out the detailed usecase for
reference counter of FreeType2 (so I cannot write short testing
code), thus I cannot start working just now. If you know any
softwares showing the problem caused by the lack of
10 matches
Mail list logo
