Shaded areas Before and After in the attached figures show where
control points have should be to permit flattening. Is this a risky
change? If anything, it is slightly more conservative, yet the
conditional is quite a bit simpler.
Uh, oh, I have no idea what you are talking about. Please
Aleksei,
If you relax the condition, you increase the number of splits. Normally, making
such a change is a mistake because the benefit of simplifying the condition is
easily outweighed by the greater cost of increasing the recursive depth. This
is the very reason why we ended up with a much
I am really annoyed by run-arounds and overzealous protection of code
by authors.
I was proposing a minor benign improvement. I am touching the water so to
speak. What's the big deal? Way to attract developers, freetypers! You go!
___
Freetype-devel
I think I can get though to this guy...
2010/11/12 David Bevan david.be...@pb.com:
I've just had a brief chance to look at your proposal, and I now understand
why it makes no difference to the output. The chances of your relaxed
condition causing a split when the current (theoretically
Aleksei,
you really shouldn't be annoyed. My earlier patch was shown to be inferior to
David Bevan's, and I was obliged to accept the fact. The only possible criteria
are objective ones: does it work? is it faster? is it simpler? I believe David
has shown using objective arguments that the
All,
If you at least admitted that my patch would produce a better code...
If you at least admitted that my patch is interesting...
I would gladly provide more explanation.
Instead, I hear should not be applied for some bogus reasons,
actually just one reason I do not understand it.
Now you are
On 11/12/10 07:56, Алексей Подтележников wrote:
Let's face it. It's only you and me who understand these conditions.
Not really. The rest of us just don't care. Because it's just a Bezier
flattener after all...
No personal attacks on this list. We're grown ups.
behdad
[+harfbuzz list, Kenichi Handa]
On 11/06/10 05:22, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
Hi,
To parse OpenType tables at low level and
obtain the substituted glyph index, libotf
might be useful.
http://www.m17n.org/libotf/
Interesting. I had totally forgotten about libotf. I hope
