[ft-devel] Re: [FYI] Re: Getting pathname from FT_Face (patch for future discussion)

2010-03-15 Thread mpsuzuki
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:44:29 +0900 mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote: I will post about the code size evaluation. Here is the result by Linux/i386 gcc-4.4.2. My patch increases the code size about 1% - 2%. I think enable-by-default won't blow out most systems using FreeType2 under default config.

Re: [ft-devel] Re: [FYI] Re: Getting pathname from FT_Face (patch for future discussion)

2010-03-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Here is the result by Linux/i386 gcc-4.4.2. My patch increases the code size about 1% - 2%. This is more than I have expected. I think enable-by-default won't blow out most systems using FreeType2 under default config. OK. However, it would be nice if it is surrounded by FT_CONFIG_...

[ft-devel] Re: [FYI] Re: Getting pathname from FT_Face (patch for future discussion)

2010-03-15 Thread mpsuzuki
Werner, Now I'm reworking my patch to provide a single generic interface like this: /*/ /* */ /* Function

Re: [ft-devel] Re: [FYI] Re: Getting pathname from FT_Face (patch for future discussion)

2010-03-15 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 03/15/2010 08:36 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote: FT_EXPORT( FT_Error ) FT_Object_Get_Property( FT_Librarylibrary, FT_Pointerobject, const char* object_type, const char*