Werner,
7 2005 17:54, :
- I have no problem with introducing 'const' in 2.2.0.
- I also think that keeping the non-constness of the
current 2.1.x line is _not_ a big problem.
- I don't want a FT_CONST macro in the next release,
(2.1.10). That's ugly as hell, and the kind of
Sounds good, but I think the name should be something more
specific, like FT_CONST for the least.
Yes, definitely.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
PROTECTED]
la part de
Werner LEMBERG
Envoyé : lundi 6 juin 2005 18:20
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Objet : [ft-devel] Re: const problems
As to 'const' problems, I understand that adding such a change into
public parts of FT can break API compatibility. But I
