Re: 6th OT-SVG hook bridge (Re: skia as a shared library, and the (poor) support for Google's OT-SVG variant by libre software

Besides those two questions - who maintains that color font compiler, and where else can you find fonts with similar problems, not made by Google. I just had a third - given that those fonts don't work at all with any of the usual SVG readers/editors, and freetype can't read them correctly

Re: 6th OT-SVG hook bridge (Re: skia as a shared library, and the (poor) support for Google's OT-SVG variant by libre software

Hmm, "nanoemoji color font compiler" is maintained by? It is largely for simplicity - you can try find some colour fonts from other sources which show the same problems? On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 13:21:11 BST, Cosimo Lupo wrote: Hin-Tak, the OT-SVG fonts which are built by the

Re: 6th OT-SVG hook bridge (Re: skia as a shared library, and the (poor) support for Google's OT-SVG variant by libre software

Hin-Tak, the OT-SVG fonts which are built by the nanoemoji color font compiler are, to the best of my knowledge, up to spec (I mean, the OpenType SVG table specification). The SVG documents embedded in the OpenType SVG table are *not* supposed to be simply extracted to an .svg text file and then