On 17 June 2011 19:43, Dave Crossland dcrossl...@google.com wrote:
A Verdana comparison would be nice! :)
Yet, on consideration, impossible, due to proprietary licensing
restrictions. What a pain! :)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel
On 18 June 2011 04:42, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Please post a URL
where I can download the Ubuntu font you've used.
http://font.ubuntu.com
Of note is that at larger sizes (20px - 30px) the rendering breaks up
on curves. Is it possible that the autohinter is not yet set to
Hi
What technology is best to implement the GUI with?
QT?
Web?
Cheers
Dave
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
On 13 January 2012 20:13, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I would like to add something similar, with the exception that code
especially marked as patented within the FreeType source code is not
covered.
Comments?
Why not just switch to Apache?
On 17 January 2012 09:25, David Turner di...@google.com wrote:
An easier approach would be to ask for all future contributions to be
covered by FreeType License 1.1,
...
Apache2 is not compatible with GPLv2 notably because of this
particular patent clause (that's the general agreement anyway
On 23 January 2012 19:49, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I agree that ttfautohint should continue to build the same as
before, and additionally have a GUI.
I don't like that. Having two separate programs which do the same is
problematic to synchronize. As mentioned in another mail, I'll
I support the use of pandoc.
Does it output texinfo?
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Thanks! I really appreciate your contribute :-)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Wow, this is a very exciting development! Erik, thanks for all your
help with this :-)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
I confirm this works on Mac OS X 10.7 Lino
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Hi
it is the 'G' option that gave the only 'different' rendering
i saw, and it's not overall better anyway
Hmm. Looks to me like Capture-G-win7GDI.PNG is the best of those 3,
though the c and e and some numbers have some issues, there are less
overall than the other 2.
Alas I think there is a
On 3 July 2012 12:09, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello Vern!
In git, I've now fixed the situation displayed in your
`Capture-G-win7GDI.png' image (showing Open Sans at 21px, please look
at the ugly rendering of digit 3, for example): It was a buglet in
FreeType's autofit module
On 3 July 2012 20:58, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I prefer the human to the computer.
+1
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
On 4 July 2012 20:15, vernon adams v...@newtypography.co.uk wrote:
On 4 July 2012 17:28, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
please test the current git. I have slightly changed the code in the
auto-hinter which recognizes flat segments; it now accepts a broader
group of shapes. As a
Will this arrive in ttfautohint? :)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
On 27 November 2012 21:07, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Many of them are not freely available but are essential for
testing. Any idea how to handle this?
Like http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/ttf-mscorefonts-installer
___
Freetype-devel
Hi!
TTFAutohint is compared to other hinting methods in screencasts on
http://openfonts.hagilda.com :-)
--
Cheers
Dave
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Want a Mac?
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
On 11 April 2013 00:54, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) jungs...@google.com wrote:
the issue appears to be in fontforge
I've started a ff bug for this at
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/528
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
On 11 April 2013 01:35, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) jungs...@google.com wrote:
your bug description has misleading bits
I've read everyone again more carefully and updated
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/528 - please let me know
if further updates are needed :)
On 1 May 2013 20:16, vernon adams v...@newtypography.co.uk wrote:
That's look like good stuff.
Will this new code also be integrated into ttfautohint library? :)
Its CFF so no
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Hi!
On 19 July 2013 17:50, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
This is a major change which should improve the rendering results
enormously for many TrueType fonts
Could you post a visual sample?
Will this improve ttfautohint?
--
Cheers
Dave
Hi!
http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2014/?p=199
The Call for Participation has now been published!
For this year we are especially interested in presentations that
showcase how the gap between technical and design development can be
bridged.
We are looking for:
In-depth presentations on Libre
Congratulations Werner! This is a huge milestone! :)
On 23 March 2014 06:42, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
http://freetype.org/ttfautohint
ttfautohint 1.00 has been released. It took me three years of hard
work to finally present a version that I consider as usable for daily
work.
Good stuff! The A is much better
On 12 Apr 2014 19:54, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Folks,
I've just improved the recognition of strong points in the
auto-hinter. From the ChangeLog file:
[autofit] Redesign the recognition algorithm of strong points.
In particular, local
Hi
Great!! :)
On 12 March 2015 at 12:07, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Folks,
I've just added support for the Arabic script in FreeType's
auto-hinter and to ttfautohint. This is experimental stuff! Please
test.
Werner
___
Having a gx demo font will be sweet!!
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Hi
BTW, http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/12720/ :)
On 31 May 2015 at 06:38, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Folks,
GX support should now work in general, please test! At least with
`Skia.ttf' I no longer see artifacts.
Adam, I still have problems with two glyphs in `Zycon
On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
is that a rethoric question? ;-)
No, quite serious :)
How shall this work? We have no influence on Microsoft... It would
be great if we could snip with the fingers, and the font guys there do
a new release of the
On 8 Jun 2015 8:35 pm, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-06-08 05:21 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 8 Jun 2015 8:15 pm, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com
mailto:behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-06-08 03:57 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 8 June
On 8 Jun 2015 8:15 pm, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-06-08 03:57 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org mailto:w...@gnu.org
wrote:
is that a rethoric question? ;-)
No, quite serious :)
How
On 8 June 2015 at 06:47, Cosimo Lupo cosimo.l...@daltonmaag.com wrote:
And yes, FVal is very old — although the warning is in accordance with the
TT and OT specs on the matter.
Is anyone interested in updating it?
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
On 8 June 2015 at 07:39, Cosimo Lupo cosimo.l...@daltonmaag.com wrote:
is that a rethoric question? ;-)
No, quite serious :)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Hi
On Aug 25, 2015 8:21 PM, Dave Arnold darn...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm happy to see all of this activity on stem darkening in the past week.
It looks like excellent progress. I'm sorry it was a period when I was on
vacation and away from email. Hopefully, most questions have been answered,
but
Nice work!
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
On 6 December 2015 at 22:42, Nikolaus Waxweiler wrote:
> Would you be willing to host the site on Github Pages?
>>
>> http://pages.github.com
>>
>
> Is this addressed to Werner?
Yes
> I personally would vote in favor of moving the FreeType site and main code
> repository
On 1 December 2015 at 04:07, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Basically, I don't object.
Would you be willing to host the site on Github Pages?
http://pages.github.com
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
On 14 December 2015 at 18:35, Behdad Esfahbod
wrote:
> On 15-12-14 01:51 PM, Sascha Brawer wrote:
> > According to a Myanmar speaker here at Google, the autohinted version is
> > actually better (easier to read) than the manually hinted one.
> Congratulations!
>
>
I agree with Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Great news! Thank you Werner!
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Thanks for keeping us informed! :)
On 10 February 2016 at 01:26, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An earlier version of some of this was sent to Werner privately
> yesterday. I thought a bit more, and posted it as:
>
>
Hi
On twitter, Behdad said of ttfautohint control files,
"Any reliance on ttf point numbers is futile..."
- https://twitter.com/behdadesfahbod/status/719340420216434688
In response, I asked, how should type designers be hinting fonts these
days? :)
Behdad suggested we move the discussion to
Thanks Hin-Tak! You did an amazing thing in the last year :D
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Hi
Wow, that's awesome!
On 16 July 2016 at 12:50, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Support for GX in FreeType becomes better and better :-)
>
> Behdad has just fixed some bugs in the GX delta handling – now all
> glyphs from the infamous `Zycon' font are displayed correctly!
>
> I've
I love it
On Mar 29, 2017 8:48 AM, "Hin-Tak Leung" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29/3/17, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Nice! This essentially makes a command line
> version of FontVal,
> right?
>
>
> Yes, it is a
Congrats on getting this release out there :)
On 15 August 2017 at 16:52, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> Finally got round to build the binary - just get
> FontVal-2.1.0-py-bin-net4.zip from
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/hp-pxl-jetready/files/Microsoft%20Font%
>
Thanks for the kind note Graham! I love these bits of history :))
On May 24, 2017 6:33 AM, "Graham Asher" wrote:
> I'm now leaving the FreeType development mailing list. My product,
> CartoType, still relies on FreeType for its typography and will always do
> so, but
On Jun 14, 2017 1:59 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote:
Felipe,
> (I really miss a Freetype method to alter a single design-space
> coordinate, instead of having to pass the full array, by the way)
what API do you suggest? Given that normally an application wants to
control *all*
In the photocomp era, may different machines were developed that produced
the same visual typography using different methods :)
On 2 September 2017 at 19:30, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> At least in the English that I learned, two things that are not the same
> are different. So
Hi
Does freetype support OpenType in SVG fonts?
--
Cheers
Dave
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
I'm curious if you have any updates on this? :)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Since almost all new fonts are vf, I'm no longer seeing ttfautohint in
common usage, but I don't think it's effected by this.
On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 17:41, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 August 2023 at 18:28:54 BST, Dave Crossland
> wrote:
>
> > Since almost all new fonts are vf, I'm no longer seeing ttfautohint in
> common usage, but I don't think it's effected by this.
>
> That's not n
53 matches
Mail list logo