I don't mean "we" as in FRIAM, I mean "we" as in nations. A benefit of
capturing knowledge with LLMs, or similar technology, is that people wouldn't
need to be educated about the same material over and over, especially if these
systems are integrated into our neural systems. Why not have
As one of the few, if not the only, person who has been a full time
employee of a philosophy department for multiple years, I am quick to
defend my former colleagues. Read "Actual Causation and Thought
Experiments" by Glymour and Wimberly in J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & H. S.
Silverstein (eds.),
So there’s a rather concrete way in which one can imagine ChatGPT’s being
particularly useful as a time-saver.
I have heard it said (and find it persuasive), that philosophy is different
from physics because what philosophers want to do and settle for being is
different from that for
All art is derivative, so why bother... really?
On 6/4/23 1:53 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
The conclusion I draw is that these conversations have all occurred
before. So I wonder, why have them?
*From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:* Sunday, June 4, 2023 10:44 AM
*To:* The
Discussions with large language models are new. But you are right, we had
discussions of similar topics before. Maybe I was hoping I could inspire Nick
and/or Eric to write a summary of their ideas and what we have discussed before
( such as the solution to the hard problem of consciousness,
The conclusion I draw is that these conversations have all occurred before. So
I wonder, why have them?
From: Friam On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 10:44 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism
ChatGPT now allows
ChatGPT now allows sharing conversations. I've asked it about William James
book "Essays in Radical
Empiricism"https://chat.openai.com/share/375aef4e-a8d6-467e-8061-bd85b341c46b-J.-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays
