On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:10:39PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org writes:
Actually, only Debian main is intended to be 100% dfsg-free
software.
Intended by who? Not by someone who agrees with the Debian project's
social contract:
1. Debian Will
Bryan Baldwin br...@katofiad.co.nz writes:
I understand that Debian has a fully functional fully free subset of
the system.
The fully functional, fully-free system is identical with Debian. This
is because that is the *definition* of Debian, as defined by the Debian
project in their founding
Bryan Baldwin br...@katofiad.co.nz writes:
Taking ownership means stating plainly and publicly that contrib and
nonfree are part of Debian.
That would be the lie. They are not part of Debian.
Whether you mean the project, the system, the distribution, or any
other possible subdivisions and
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:40:31PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
That would be the lie. They are not part of Debian.
http://bugs.debian.org/zangband
http://packages.debian.org/zangband
http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zangband.html
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=zangband
Do you
Clint Adams cl...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:40:31PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
[The Debian project claiming that ‘contrib’ and ‘non-free’ are part
of Debian] would be the lie. They are not part of Debian.
Do you understand how a sane and honest person might disagree
with
