On 11/24/12 12:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
That link has no guidance from the FSF yet. That bug log includes
only senior debian developers engaged in a debate about the issue. If
FSF doesn't produce guidance there, then the decision that happens
there will only a barometer of a certain subset
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:22:55PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
1. Move the non-free and the contrib repository from the debian.org
domain to another domain name, under control of DD's.
Note the difference between the text above and below:
I would argue that moving contrib and
Stefano Zacchiroli said:
Documenting that access to contrib/non-free material happens via a
different domain (e.g. nonfree.org, or nondebian.org which I've
registered a while ago for this purpose) that then redirects to the
Debian infrastructure.
What is meant by this? Would it mean that
On 24/11/12 20:57, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le vendredi, 23 novembre 2012 21.18:33, Bryan Baldwin a écrit :
Documentation is not software. I wouldn't be surprised to find
differences when comparing licenses drawn for software to licenses
drawn for documentation. Software freedom guidelines
