[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/26/2005 07:43:02 AM:
Syed Imran Ali wrote:
I don't know if you specifically asked for DSL or Cable
modems or what you exactly wanna do with it.
As far as AT commands are your concerns, I think most of the
ppl on the list can help you out.
Btw,
Hmmm, are our eyes magically better than yours? What are you seeing?
Cheers
Bart Lansing
1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/23/2005 06:12:31 AM:
Hi,
I know these are unsecure cameras. But what are we looking at
through one of this camera. There are many out there but i did
, and will.
Bart Lansing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/16/2005 05:59:05 AM:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:26:33 +0100, Polarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'am a little curious on the impacts.
Any suggestions appreciated.
PKI relies on certificates, certificates relies on SHA-1,
pretty much all
Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/16/2005 10:10:44 AM:
Hello,
A couple of things to note from mr schneider's blog warning...
It's schneier, not schneider.
Thx for the correction, eyes saw a d, expecting it to be there based on
commonality...isn't the mind a wonderful thing?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/16/2005 12:08:14 PM:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:27:45 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Fact: If the paper and method are sound...the sky STILL is not
falling
(although it will be raining pretty darned hard)...2^69
operations...to
get a collision...how many
Bart Lansing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/16/2005 03:37:16 PM:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:27:45 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of things to note from mr schneider's blog warning...
His name is Schneier, at least show some respect?
Read my other reply
get my point.
No offense, but their work does not
say what you said it says.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services/Lotus Notes
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
01/28/2005 10:26:40 AM:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Check it here - http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers
Exibar, IANAL...are you?
However, you do know that inheritence
laws differ from state to state and that in dealing with Yahoo! we are
dealing with an international? Also, I remain unconvinced of your
assertion that a default inheritor owns digital records. Can you
cite case law to support your
Exibar wrote on 12/23/2004 09:36:40 AM:
I applaud Yahoo for adhearing to their policies. All the familly
has to do
is send legal documents of their son's death, and legal documents
stating
who they are. At that point I'm sure the account information
will be
released as per Yahoo's policy.
n3td3v wrote on 12/23/2004 05:35:58 AM:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:59:25 -0800, morning_wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's in that mailbox is/was mine, none of your business
unless I chose
to share it.
i couldnt agree more... another case of lame, illogical media
bullshit
BRAVO
n3td3v wrote on 12/21/2004 08:01:53 PM:
http://news.com.com/Yahoo+denies+family+access+to+dead+marines+e-
mail/2100-1038_3-5500057.html?tag=st.prev
http://news.com.com/5208-1038-0.html?
forumID=1threadID=3847messageID=21470start=-1
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/03/2004
07:50:36 PM:
And if the spammers don't like my packets being sent to their
system,
all they have to do is send me a polite e-mail asking to be removed
from my flood-list. It is really quite simple!
Wow. Obviously you are not responsible for
Merrick
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: 07929 208 567
ServiceStyle Ltd. - Manchester's Technology Experts
https://www.servicestyle.com
GPG Public Key - https://www.servicestyle.com/joel_servicestyle.asc
[attachment signature.asc deleted by Bart Lansing/Corp/Kohls]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
Vord,
Let's extend your logic a bit...
Given your diatribe, one can easily
make the following assertion and assume your full support:
{It is clear that the internet...being
composed of largely uncontrollable, independent nodes...may easily be subverted
for uses that are counter to the greater
Paul Schmehl wrote on 11/19/2004 11:07:47 AM:
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 12:12:10 AM + Jason Coombs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,1
0801,97614,00.html?nas=PM-97614
I wouldn't trust anything coming out of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/17/2004
02:55:08 PM:
Hello list,
Mission Impossible theme sounded weird (too weird) and so on...
Tell me:
why should these link be active after the UNITED STATES SECRET
SERVICE Operation ?
http://www.shadowcrew.com/phpBB2/login.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/16/2004
01:22:25 PM:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and
other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or replacement page
showing words from the intelligence
Paul Schmehl pontificated on 11/12/2004 11:51:17 AM:
--On Thursday, November 11, 2004 02:21:23 PM -0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Depending on your state/county/whatever, your vote did count
a LOT LESS
than other votes. It all depends on how many electoral college
votes your
state has.
Ok, someone please call someone else
a Nazi so we can invoke the ancient and honorable rule that will result
in this thread being killed.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services/Lotus Notes
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/21/2004
04:35:05 PM:
Wow, that has to rate as one
Jason, I have a rather direct question:
Given what you know...and what you wrotewhy in blazes did you
cast your vote electronically?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services/Lotus Notes
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/20/2004
08:24:59 PM:
I just voted for John Kerry at a walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/18/2004 05:38:18 PM:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:28:39 -0400, Clairmont, Jan M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole point of hiring people who don't know much|Major snips|
Jan, is that how you got hired by any chance? Some firm looking for
people who don't
tends to breed
extortionists, don't you think?
Anyway, this is Full Disclosure, not Psychology Today...I just dislike
being misquoted...
cheers
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/08/2004 06:01:35 PM:
Judicious snips...
And I don't agree
the reasons you say they
are useless...people cannot be made to change, therefore laws are in place
to deter unwanted behaviors...and failing that, to punish those who are
not detered. Behavior modification through negative reinfirecement
works...always has, most likely always will.
Bart Lansing
Todd...what on earth makes you think they did not? This is not new
behavior...at all. The practice has been going on for years, long before
PCs/Internet. Face it, people who can break security are valuable to
those trying to create it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/20/2004 09:38:07 AM:
it already is. FD does NOT mean FREE DELIVERY, it means Full
Disclosure.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/03/2004 10:16:26 AM:
James Tucker to Harlan Carvey to me to :
... If you want to email me a copy of it, I'll
rip it apart and see
Thomas,
No, you are on the right list...assuming you mean to be subscribed to the
full-disclosure list...which is hardly a US-centric list. I'll not
apologize for Gideon's nationalistic spam, but will comment that there are
far more appropriate places for it.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop
(and elsewhere) heard the term good worm and leapt to a series of
conclusions so quickly that they never bothered to find out what it was
that they were talking about.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/20/2004 09:14
Linux should be a fairly
straight-forward task. You might consider visiting Dell's Linux-Desktop
Community Forum for more help in this area.
_
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/18/2004 03:20:29 PM:
OK - put your money where your mouth
Brandon, did you by any chance take the time to let Wired know what's
going on? I understand it's their responsibility and it should nto be
happening...but, it's possible they don't even know.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/10/2004 01:00:06 PM
won't
say that. The easier we can make his use of secure products and systems
the more likely he is to use them, would you agree?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Lyal Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/08/2004 02:32:15 AM:
$10 smartcard
$200 reader (with pinpad)
$500
Discovery Date : 8/10/2004 (PHL)
Origin : USA
Description ( updated : 8/9/2004 11:03:26 AM )
There are reports now in the USA of a malware spreading via email. The
file, price.exe, is spread as a ZIP file, and is included in a supposedly
manually-spammed email.
This price.exe file is a
1/10 of that on a per seat basis...
Why get hung up on it being a smartcard, when you can do two factor with a
much lower entry cost and do it, frankly, easier?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/05/2004 08:45:33 PM:
This exposure, of PIN
of desktops you are responsible for?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/19/2004
05:50:55 PM:
Vic Vandal wrote:
Anyone seeing what looks like a brand new MyDoom variant?
Comes in e-mail as a message.zip, extracts to a message.doc
followed
-breaking my apps.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/13/2004
12:12:24 PM:
We already know the firewall will be enabled by default.
Will auto download patches be default?
After auto download, will Windows XP auto install the patch by default?
I
that a vendor knowing the vuln will in fact be disclosed
after a reasonable period of time, fixed or not, has certainly motivated
more than a few to get the fix done prior to taking a public black eye.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/06/2004
10:47:47
You mass-invite a whole freaking group
and you call if fittest/fastest? No different that ad-spamming us...which
come to think of it is just what you did.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/30/2004
10:56:35 AM:
Hmmm ...
A lot discussions
Unitl your crappy office filter is smart
enough to know that that is a potential anonymizer and blocks it as well...like
ours does.
Cheers
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/23/2004
12:04:01 PM:
This really isn't that new.
For years you have
Charlie...
Put down the crack pipe and back away
slowly. You are surely not suggesting that this issue of Cisco's
code has anything...at all...remotely...in common with the people and actions
you listed...seriously...you're kidding...right??
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's
, but there are a lot more layers out there
than simple IP filtering. Of course, as always, it is the repsonsibility
of those who are vulnerable to make themselves less so...but it's not quite
as bleak a landscape as you paint it to be.
Cheers
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL
Vladis, I think you've misunderstood
me. I mean to say that the Cisco events pales...amazingly...to the
people and events he listed. If you feel the Cisco code leak/theft
is in any way as important, meaningful, or impactful as any of them...I'm
not the one in need of foil.
Cheers.
Bart Lansing
lol, ok, I think we can both take off
the tinfoil hats now, eh?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/28/2004 03:33 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking
Laws Cisco's stolen code
On Fri, 28 May
...better education at the user level...this is a good thing, a
needful thing. It is quite another to excuse a criminal of his behaviour.
I may be stupid if I leave my car window
down and my laptop on the car seat...but you are a thief and a criminal
if you steal it.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop
Dave...et al...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/03/2004
05:28:43 PM:
Harlan Carvey wrote:
Yes, I can agree with that...I do get the point. But who
are the
users? Say you're an admin at a law firm...if the users
are supposed
to be security-conscious (face it, a great many admins
lack
the 3rd time I tried to perform surgery,
I think I'm morally justified if I get ticked the 3rd time that surgeon
practices sysadminning without a license. ;)
How the heck did Doc get admin rights?
grin
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/19/2004 05
hats..d00dz...no end users, nothing to sploit...)
Can we please save the insults and just focus on what we're doing?
I'm tired of stoopid luser this... stoopid luser
that...insulting the reason you have a job is...well...stoopid.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED
on now :)
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/15/2004
12:12:21 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Dave and what was it ... jeff, Curt and exhibar, your in
here too,
and I'll throw Fitzgerled on just for fun
Neither one of you know what
yawn
wake me up when there is something here
that qualifies as good news...so one guy who is rich enough to buy his
own country can now afford one more B1 Bomber than the other guy rich enough
to buy his own country...woopee
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED
as simple
as you've made it out to be.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/02/2004
05:41:24 PM:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
morning_wood
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:33 PM
is useful in terms of making your point.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/05/2004 11:05 AM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re:
[FD] FD should block attachments
--On Monday, April 05
this, in
which case please refer to A.)
You didn't get anything from Microsoft for free, Jeff...really, you didn't.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Jeff Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/21/2004 10:48:19 AM:
Not necessarily...
My fully registered and activated copy of Office
executables by policy anyway, yes?
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Well, what would you expect, that the virusgateway would brute-forcecrack
the
zip password ? No. It has only two options:
A) Delete all password protected zipfiles regardless
or
B) Let any and all password
allow zipped executables to meander through your mail system
as long as they pass a virues scan, you must have damned busy 0 days. This
ain't complicated...at all.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
Leave passworded .zips alone -- take the sensible approach and catch an
infected file
wonderful to pontificate about how the world ought to be...but there
are more than a few of us who get to deal with it the way it is. People
make mistakes.
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/24/2004 05:57:25 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tobias, I
Daniel...
This is off-topic as well...and probably should not even be here...but...
As a former Teamster who later moved into the systems world...horse
hockey. Unions have not stopped the flood of jobs overseas, do not have
the right to impose product decisions or have the authority to
completely away and imploded, taking most of the east coast of the US with
it, or sucked so much that some violent explosion would ensue releasing
little CERTlettes throughout the noosphere.
Harrison B (Bart) Lansing
Manager, NeSST, Desktop Services
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/18
Right off the bat I am going to be leary of any email supposedly from a
major vendor that can't get the year right.
Bart Lansing
Manager, NeSST
Kohl's IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2003 01:01:19 PM:
Hello,
Wondering if anyone on this list downloaded this virus? If so, may
I
Has the Win2kSP4/IE6.0 combination been confirmed as immune to this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/05/2003 04:36:16 PM:
Doesn't appear to work on Win2kSP4 with IE6.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday, November 5, 2003
In our never-ending quest for
57 matches
Mail list logo
