[Full-Disclosure] Yahoo Messenger. Yahoo Mail vulnerable

2005-03-02 Thread n3td3v
vulnerability. A very evil and malicious user can bring Yahoo's internal mail system to a crawl, with your bot net, you were using to make money from mareters who were paying you to spam inboxes with under normal money manking circumstances. Thanks for your time security community n3td3v once

[Full-Disclosure] Shadow Crew back in business

2005-02-21 Thread n3td3v
the American Secret Service come to get it from you. Thanks, n3td3v My list is located at http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v if you want off-list contact. Hi to Yahoo! Security Team and the American Secret Service, n3td3v is always happy to provide intelligence to take away silly groups like

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Yahoo security and privacy

2005-01-07 Thread n3td3v
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:18:49 +0200, Alex V. Lukyanenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting n3td3v, Because we all know Yahoo! has no account security, so kids aged 15 can hack an account. Yahoo! is like hacking for beginners. Its easy to do, and therefore a great network to learn skills

Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T-

2005-01-06 Thread n3td3v
Yahoo! has no account security, so kids aged 15 can hack an account. Yahoo! is like hacking for beginners. Its easy to do, and therefore a great network to learn skills.. bravo Yahoo!, you have a use after all. n3td3v owns you all, even you self proclaimed and so-called experts and professionals

Re: [Full-Disclosure] This sums up Yahoo!s security policy to a -T-

2004-12-23 Thread n3td3v
. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Script Injection in Google Groups Beta

2004-12-22 Thread n3td3v
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:59:00 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:29:24 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I was testing Google Groups Beta (http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v) I found the script tags executed on the Google Groups site. This only

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Script Injection in Google Groups Beta

2004-12-22 Thread n3td3v
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:29:24 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I was testing Google Groups Beta (http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v) I found the script tags executed on the Google Groups site. This only seems to work while clicking on a reply thread, using the reply menu

[Full-Disclosure] Script Injection in Google Groups Beta

2004-12-21 Thread n3td3v
Script injection in Google Groups Beta. If a user views a thread carefully crafted by a malicious user, then the script executes, instead of the thread. Concept: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v/browse_thread/thread/2379f18f5986c985 All users are vulnerable

[Full-Disclosure] Script Injection in Google Groups Beta

2004-12-21 Thread n3td3v
When I was testing Google Groups Beta (http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v) I found the script tags executed on the Google Groups site. This only seems to work while clicking on a reply thread, using the reply menu, featured on a given groups homepage, when an older thread gets a reply

[Full-Disclosure] This sums up Yahoo!s security policy to a -T-

2004-12-21 Thread n3td3v
http://news.com.com/Yahoo+denies+family+access+to+dead+marines+e-mail/2100-1038_3-5500057.html?tag=st.prev http://news.com.com/5208-1038-0.html?forumID=1threadID=3847messageID=21470start=-1 ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter:

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Lycos Ends AntiSpam Effort, Denies Downing Spam Sites

2004-12-07 Thread n3td3v
they made it unclear until Monday. To begin with they said the site was offline while they discuss network matters. n3td3v, geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] makelovenotspam [dot] com

2004-12-06 Thread n3td3v
Well they've removed the Stay Tuned under the logo. I wonder if this means anything. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] I'm calling for LycosEU heads and team to resign or be sacked

2004-12-03 Thread n3td3v
and person. The argument that Lycos EU are not DDos'ing is not washable. Its DDoS plain and simple. Yep exactly what script kiddies do when they have a grudge over someone ;-) Lycos EU don't have grudges do they? Resign or be sacked. Thanks, n3td3v security enthusiast

[Full-Disclosure] Fwd: Kill Lycos Not Spam

2004-12-01 Thread n3td3v
Dear Yahoo Surely theres a way for hax0rs to exploit it to make it attack yahoo? I appeal for you to partnership with Microsoft and others like you do for other spam stuff, to ask Lycos EU to stop doing it. Its totally abuseable. By the way, I noticed Yahoo! homepage was slower for me. I don't

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Kill Lycos Not Spam

2004-12-01 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:18:11 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Yahoo Surely theres a way for hax0rs to exploit it to make it attack yahoo? I appeal for you to partnership with Microsoft and others like you do for other spam stuff, to ask Lycos EU to stop doing it. Its totally

[Full-Disclosure] Fwd: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam screensaver site?

2004-12-01 Thread n3td3v
-- Forwarded message -- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:04:21 +0530 Subject: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam screensaver site? To: nanog list [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've heard reports of traceroutes through several

[Full-Disclosure] If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all start doing it?

2004-12-01 Thread n3td3v
If Lycos EU is going to go legally unchallenged, can we all start attacking sites which send unsolicited mail to a non-lycos mailbox. As long as we can prove the mail is actually spam. This isn't as hard as you may imagine. All you need to do is for example, check Yahoo's or Gmail's spam folder,

Re: [Full-Disclosure] If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all start doing it?

2004-12-01 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:22:30 -0500, KrispyKringle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not being a lawyer, I still think you've missed the point. The defense Lycos is using is NOT that these are spammers sites, so this is somehow legal--it would not be. Vigilantiism is never legal; you would never be

[Full-Disclosure] Fwd: From: n3td3v Interesting Page

2004-11-29 Thread n3td3v
-- Forwarded message -- From: BigBlueBall Forums [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:18:44 (GMT) Subject: From: n3td3v Interesting Page To: xploitable [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello xploitable I thought you might be interested in this post: http://www.bigblueball.com/forums

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Mailing lists and unsolicited/malicious spam

2004-11-26 Thread n3td3v
On the note of hiding e-mail addresses: Yahoo! Groups, a fully featured user group and mailing list has taken steps to prevent malicious users harvesting new e-mail addresses to add to spam list databases. They (Yahoo) cut the e-mail address on the website, so harvesting becomes impossible by

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-25 Thread n3td3v
proud you had to post it on FD how many private e-mails you get off-list agreeing with you. If i'm an idiot lamer, i'd hate to hear what they're calling you. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full

[Full-Disclosure] Mailing lists and unsolicited/malicious spam

2004-11-25 Thread n3td3v
lists having its own group of spammers targeting them, with its own nature of spam/phish/malicious code exploration. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-25 Thread n3td3v
. this is over and never should have begun. DO NOT REPLY. I WILL NOT RESPOND. --vord Ok, I won't reply to call you and this e-mail childish. Too bad, my finger slipped. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-24 Thread n3td3v
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:56:41 -0600, vord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [flame] n3td3v/malformed, please think before you speak. ive already explained this to you more than once. #hackphreak is no longer associated with a group and no longer intends to be a channel dedicated primarily to matters

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-23 Thread n3td3v
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:14:09 -0600, vord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [flame response] firstly, n3td3v is only mad because i happened to ban him from #hackphreak ... which is incidentally the current home of former/current members of [where to begin?] rhino9, w00w00 ... and of course, people

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-22 Thread n3td3v
Vord from the in-famous script kiddie channel #hackphreak!! omg, thats the biggest no credibility lamer channel ever. Its channels like #hackphreak which give IRC a bad name, the exact reason this thread started probably!! Vord, go back to #hackphreak kiddo.

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-22 Thread n3td3v
--vord #hackphreak/undernet sucka Go back to the channel you came from. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] Fwd: Security Watch: Source Code Dealer Arrested

2004-11-22 Thread n3td3v
-- Forwarded message -- From: SecurityWatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:07:13 -0500 Subject: Security Watch: Source Code Dealer Arrested To: Crew-x Security [EMAIL PROTECTED] November 22, 2004 Security Watch http://mcpmag.com/security/ http://ENTmag.com

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Why is IRC still around? (n3td3v is a troll)

2004-11-21 Thread n3td3v
. Thanks for the insults as well. Very intelligent of you. n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] gmail

2004-11-21 Thread n3td3v
http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Nov/1012289.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-20 Thread n3td3v
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:58:48 -0500, ntx0f [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think its about time to sunset this discussion, Sunsets are nice to watch in the summer months over here. Thanks,n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?

2004-11-19 Thread n3td3v
. In the meantime what would you do with the billions of legitimate users of IRC, IM and P2P? Tell them to go away as well? I'm anti-malicious hackers, but this idea just would never work. Thanks,n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread n3td3v
Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the first time? I wish they wouldn't do it in future, its looks too we own you kid behaviour. Thanks,n3td3v ___ Full

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment

2004-11-17 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:26:12 -0600, Todd Towles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent this to n3td3v yesterday. Why look into the news..just go to the DOJ website...st8r to the fish's mouth. Indictment for hundreds of credit cards, UK passports, state licenses, school IDs, bank accounts...etc

Re: [Full-Disclosure] controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-17 Thread n3td3v
, so I don't know what you mean when you use the word exclusively used by secret services. Thanks,n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment

2004-11-17 Thread n3td3v
would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on undernet looks harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to get a tighter grip on things. Thanks,n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment

2004-11-17 Thread n3td3v
promotion site? I guess you would allow a child porn promotion site, like you think its ok for zone-h to be online promoting online malicious hacking and not closed down. Thanks,n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

Re: [Full-Disclosure] controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-16 Thread n3td3v
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:36:58 - (UTC), Nick I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/29/operation_firewall/print.html http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,97017,00.html http://news.com.com/2102-7348_3-5431419.html?tag=st.util.print Thanks, n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-16 Thread n3td3v
, but yeah, its a possibility. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-15 Thread n3td3v
be a premium service. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] Re: I am new to the list and have some questions about Black Holes

2004-11-12 Thread n3td3v
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:17:32 -0800, Tony Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am new to the list and have some questions about Black Holes Tony Sit down and shut up, you'll learn more that way. Black holes? you mean outter space or security flaws? A slightly confused n3td3v Welcome to Full

Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox

2004-11-12 Thread n3td3v
Don't listen to these business wankers in suits, they'll say anything at high profile conferences to get extra claps. They have no idea what the reality is on the street. Thanks. n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Unofficial Internet Explorer FRAME/IFRAME fix

2004-11-12 Thread n3td3v
they have some sort of priority agenda for more critical flaws, which are effecting the wider web, not just M.S consumers. Totally outragous that third parties are needing to offer patches, before Microsoft. No disrespect intended to third party developers with patches by the way. Thanks, n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New MyDoom exploiting IFRAME

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
description of the word wild. (unless i was cross-minded with a seperate recently unleashed virii) Further remarks on this subject would be useful Thanks, n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v I'm a security enthusiast ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-Disclosure] Hotmail Passport (.NET Accounts) Vulnerability

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
this vulnerability a year later, via a security mailing list. It sounds more like a kids excuse for smashing a window or getting caught stealing candy from a store. Further remarks on this are welcome... Thanks, n3td3v I'm a security enthusiast My forum can be reached via a geocities address http

Re: [Full-Disclosure] EEYE: Kerio Personal Firewall Multiple IP Options Denial of Service

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
(all versions will also be vulnerable from this.) Version 2.0.15 being the last released version before the code was later handed to Kerio. Further remarks on this would be helpful. Thanks, n3td3v PS. I don't like eyee or the way they operate, i'm only replying to help vulnerable users. (not eeye

[Full-Disclosure] Re: OT: Akamai DNS and Yahoo

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:03:20 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:02:15 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:17:32 -0700, John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw many references about this in the archives but I haven't seen

[Full-Disclosure] Re: OT: Akamai DNS and Yahoo

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:02:15 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:17:32 -0700, John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw many references about this in the archives but I haven't seen a solution to it and we just started seeing this problem. Beginning

[Full-Disclosure] Re: OT: Akamai DNS and Yahoo

2004-11-09 Thread n3td3v
possibility for the spate of outages which were not continuious, but if you were online at the time, the homepage would disappear into a blank page every so often (it wasn't a full outage). Thanks, n3td3v http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v I'm a security enthusiast

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-11-03 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:31:44 +0100, Cryptochrome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NOW go away! May I ask: Who are you to tell people to go away? He's just repeating what his mom tells him to do everyday. You can't blame him for that. ;-) Thanks, n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-11-03 Thread n3td3v
This thread is more f**ked up than the U.S election. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] Should the industry be expecting a hacker response to election results?

2004-11-02 Thread n3td3v
or day of high political importance, then the U.S election result if it swings in the direction of bush would be the prime time to use it. Thanks, n3td3v [ security enthusiast ] [ http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v ] ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

[Full-Disclosure] SAVE THE WORLD FROM APOCALYSE

2004-11-01 Thread n3td3v
Vote bush out or the world will sky dive into an apocalyse. (i don't care if this is off topic, this relates to security of everyone, not just geeks on the internet who have found a bufferoverflow in X product) Thanks, n3td3v [ security enthusiast ] [ http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: I will be awaiting your immediate response.

2004-10-31 Thread n3td3v
to learn more http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys ;-) In theory gmail and yahoo are ment to be the best for anti spam, but in reality, they are the same as most other providers, with or without domainkeys. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slashdot: Gmail Accounts Vulnerable to XSS Exploit

2004-10-31 Thread n3td3v
by a third party is bound to come sooner or later I suspect. :-) Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots?

2004-10-31 Thread n3td3v
, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots?

2004-10-31 Thread n3td3v
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:57:13 +1300, Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854 The guy coming on as n3td3v is not straight away a kid or scriptkid / lamer / scene whore or otherwise. All this shows is the shallow mind

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slashdot: Gmail Accounts Vulnerable to XSS Exploit

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
have the exploit :-) Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
to read his lies and deception, propaganda? Perhaps he's only letting americans see the site, because americans are the only ones gullible enough to believe his bs. Whereas the rest of us see through him. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
evidence for doing so. We can all cry We've invaded iraq because its the war on terror, with no facts or evience to back it up. I end here, I could go on all night, but i think i've said enough for balanced americans/europeans/muslims/asians/arabs to get the drift of my opinion. Thanks, n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:30:06 +0200, Jean-Marie Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this is grossly off topic, and hiding behind a n3td3v mask doesn't give you any right to insult the intelligence of our fellow americans (not being one gives me the right to defend them, I think, although

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slightly off-topic: www.georgewbush.com

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
between bush/U.S gov and the everyday american people. If bush gets voted in, bin laden will go, OK the enemy is bush/U.S gov and the american people If kerry gets voted in, it will say the problem is the U.S gov and not the american people. I hope you get the idea. Thanks, n3td3v

[Full-Disclosure] Re: I will be awaiting your immediate response.

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
reason, What is this BS ? Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Slashdot: Gmail Accounts Vulnerable to XSS Exploit

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
be asking for a public announcement of the vulnerability, but since this has been made into a public, high profile disclosure, is it not right in the public interest for ethier the hacker or gmail team to make the vulnerability known, after its safe to do so. Thanks, n3td3v

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: I will be awaiting your immediate response.

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
of inbox phishing/spam/scams are resolved by gmail filtering, but I get the feeling its here to stay now, and remember the gmail service is still only beta, so who knows what is still yet to come. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: I will be awaiting your immediate response.

2004-10-30 Thread n3td3v
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT), jo s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's an email scam for moneyRead here: http://home.rica.net/alphae/419coal/ Ok, it all makes sense now. Thanks, n3td3v ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter