Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-18 Thread dveditz
Frank Knobbe wrote: Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP perhaps? No: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-September/026187.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter:

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-18 Thread KF_lists
all your graphic files are belong to us. -KF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Knobbe wrote: Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP perhaps? No: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-September/026187.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:46:37 CST, Frank Knobbe said: Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP perhaps? Nope - the incredible compression of .BMP files allows its use to DoS the mail server. :) pgpbsc2Iv5LYR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread Andrew Farmer
On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time, as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided to release this.

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread kquest
it's clean :-) -Original Message- From: Michael Rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure Anyone check this image for GDI+ exploit? lol -Michael On Fri, 12 Nov 2004

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread Gerry Eisenhaur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why should we feel any better... What about the libpng exploit... :) /gerry Andrew Farmer wrote: | On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote: | | On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wrote: | | I've been wanting

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread Exibar
: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:37 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why should we feel any better... What about the libpng exploit... :) /gerry Andrew Farmer wrote: | On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread Frank Knobbe
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 11:46, Andrew Farmer wrote: It's clean. Here's a PNG version, if you're still feeling paranoid. Is *that* clean of the last PNG overflow exploit? (Aug 10, 2004) Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP perhaps? Cheers, Frank signature.asc

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-15 Thread Bowes, Ronald (EST)
: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time, as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-14 Thread Michael Rutledge
Anyone check this image for GDI+ exploit? lol -Michael On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time, as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided to release this.

[Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure

2004-11-12 Thread Len Rose
I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time, as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided to release this. http://www.netsys.com/images/fool-disclosure-logo.jpg ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: