Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Eudora 6.2 attachment spoof

2004-11-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:31:14 EST, KF_lists said: Professional responses like that *really* make me wanna go out and pay for Eudora. OK. So make a difference. How much *more* are you willing to pay for Eudora to make security a higher priority? Yes, we security geeks all have a

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Eudora 6.2 attachment spoof

2004-11-15 Thread KF_lists
Professional responses like that *really* make me wanna go out and pay for Eudora. -KF Steve Dorner wrote: At 5:23 AM +1100 11/14/04, Paul Szabo wrote: Some cases remain un-fixed, as Eudora developers know and admit privately. We knew nothing of the kind, nor did we admit anything

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Eudora 6.2 attachment spoof

2004-11-15 Thread Steve Dorner
At 5:23 AM +1100 11/14/04, Paul Szabo wrote: Some cases remain un-fixed, as Eudora developers know and admit privately. We knew nothing of the kind, nor did we admit anything of the kind. You simply decided you wanted to interpret what I said to you that way. Your issue is obscure and difficult