RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-23 Thread Colin . Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/11/2004 22:51 Subject RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-22 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, November 22, 2004 02:26:35 AM +0100 Ake Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This (the preamble especially) is what _should_ eliminate the motion sensors from the list. I'm out on this one (too lazy to do the math), but is the 802.11b air interface that resilient (does it really require

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-22 Thread Ron DuFresne
I'm still not convinced that, more than a few feet from a device, the interference would even be detectable. Though two devices within 10 feet both setup in the same room of another might well conflict with one another, and might be what the original poster on device contention was

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-21 Thread Ake Nordin
(with a nod to Esmond Kane) At 17:50 2004-11-19, Paul Schmehl thusly scribed: --On Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:32:27 AM -0600 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:41:44 PM -0500 Lachniet, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could also be RF

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-19 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:32:27 AM -0600 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:41:44 PM -0500 Lachniet, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could also be RF interference. One of my coworkers tracked down a particularly interesting problem with motion

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-19 Thread Todd Towles
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:51 AM To: Lachniet, Mark Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question --On Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:32:27 AM -0600 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday

Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-19 Thread Esmond
On 10:50, Fri 19 Nov 04, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:32:27 AM -0600 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:41:44 PM -0500 Lachniet, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find it hard to believe that this is possible. 2.4Ghz is the

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-18 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:41:44 PM -0500 Lachniet, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could also be RF interference. One of my coworkers tracked down a particularly interesting problem with motion sensor lights. Turns out the motion sensors worked at the 240mhz range, which has resonance

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-18 Thread Lachniet, Mark
Okay, enough people commented on this that I had to dig out my documentation. FWIW, this is what my co-worked documented. My previous summary was not totally accurate. This was discovered by one of my co-workers, not myself. -snip From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name withheld to protect

Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread KF_lists
fake ap http://bsdvault.net/bsdfap.txt http://www.blackalchemy.to/project/fakeap/ -KF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: List, I'm an expert in nothing so when I saw this I had to ask, as Im sure theres someone out there that is a WiFi expert. Google has found no answer so here goes. Last night we saw a

Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread Dave King
As far as handheld devices to aid you in your quest go, there are several options. If you've got a Pocket PC around you can try ministumbler, which is basically the Pocket PC version of netstumbler. It's free and would probably do most of what you want. If you want more and you're willing

Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread GuidoZ
I'm not 100% on this, as it could be something I've never heard of (of course). However, it sounds a lot like someone is playing with FakeAP: - http://www.blackalchemy.to/project/fakeap/ It's not real difficult to setup and only requires a Prisim chipset card (one or more) and a compatible Linux

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread Lachniet, Mark
this is not the problem, but just thought I'd mention it. Mark Lachniet -Original Message- From: KF_lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question fake ap http://bsdvault.net

Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread GuidoZ
it. Mark Lachniet -Original Message- From: KF_lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question fake ap http://bsdvault.net/bsdfap.txt http

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread Todd Towles
PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question As far as handheld devices to aid you in your quest go, there are several options. If you've got a Pocket PC around you can try ministumbler, which is basically the Pocket PC version of netstumbler. It's free

RE: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question

2004-11-17 Thread Todd Towles
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GuidoZ Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] WiFi question I'm not 100% on this, as it could be something I've never