--- Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon Hannah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date sent:Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:48:14 -0800 (PST)
01000101 01101110 0110 01110101 01100111 01101000
00101100 0010 0111 01101100 01110010 01100101
0111 01100100 0001 00101100 0010 01110111
It's about breaching the human interface. If people
understand something and literalists insist on correcting
them, it doesn't serve the purpose of advancing any goal - it
only expands the rift.
Oh dear, we're going to get serious. ;-)
I do think a leaning towards pedantry is often
Gadi Evron wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Drsolly wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Hi all,
What's wrong with this picture? Well, opening sentence...
http://www.ironport.com/toc/
IronPort Threat Operations Center
The 24x7x365 IronPort Threat Operation Center
--- David Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh dear, we're going to get serious. ;-)
Yeah, I'm just a hoot at parties... ;~)
I do think a leaning towards pedantry is often part of
the security geek mindset. Not only do we tend to have a
scientific background where a certain amount of
24 hours means 24 hours. 24 hours 7 days a week means all the time.
This week it does. What about next week?
And are we sure that all 60 minutes of each hour are covered? Perhaps we
need 60/24/7.
Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Larry Seltzer wrote:
I believe 24/7 covers it. Why the rest?
Why not just 24?
24 hours means 24 hours. 24 hours 7 days a week means all the time.
Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
We just changed our coverage marketing literature to...
We cover the year of the Rat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gadi Evron
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:38 AM
To: Larry Seltzer
Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [funsec]
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Larry Seltzer wrote:
24 hours means 24 hours. 24 hours 7 days a week means all the time.
This week it does. What about next week?
And are we sure that all 60 minutes of each hour are covered? Perhaps we
need 60/24/7.
I am good with 60 minutes every hour, says the same
60/60/24/7/52-and-a-bit.
Let's not go to nanoseconds. Even for this group, -that- would be pedantic.
--
David Harley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer
Sent: 04 February 2008 16:04
To: Gadi Evron
Cc:
Gadi Evron wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Larry Seltzer wrote:
I believe 24/7 covers it. Why the rest?
Why not just 24?
24 hours means 24 hours. 24 hours 7 days a week means all the time.
Reminds me of the old Steven Wright joke about the man walking up to a
convenience
And yet, I would guess that if you phoned them some time,
you'd get a recorded message saying Your call is important
to us ...
If it was important to them, they'd probably have given you a different
number. :)
--
David Harley
___
Fun and Misc
i'd love to learn that it's not to late to patent the ideas of an RBL (in my
case) or AVAS (in drsolly's case) but i really don't think the patent system
works like that. is anybody an actual patent lawyer around here?
I'm not a patent lawyer, but am going to comment anyway ;-)
Once something
I vote we take loose pennies and purchase laptops at that joke of a store.
Yet another reason that I will not shop that that beheamoth of a mess.
CompUSA is such a freaking riot - they're better than Calvin and Hobbes! ;p
I just wish I understood why they are still in business from their
Date sent: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:22:02 -0800
From: Hubbard, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We just changed our coverage marketing literature to...
We cover the year of the Rat.
So, you think you're going to weasel out of the argument?
== (quote
Date sent: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +
From: David Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And yet, I would guess that if you phoned them some time,
you'd get a recorded message saying Your call is important
to us ...
If it was important to them, they'd probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon Hannah wrote:
| Date sent:Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:48:14 -0800 (PST)
| From: Chris Blask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| 01000111 0111 01100100 01101001 0010 01110111
| 01100101 0111
i'd love to learn that it's not to late to patent the ideas of an RBL (in my
case) or AVAS (in drsolly's case) but i really don't think the patent system
works like that. is anybody an actual patent lawyer around here?
--
Paul Vixie
I'm sure you could get several enthusiastic (and
Someone should compile a Best of Funsec. This should go
in there (without the conversion link), some of David's and
other gems.
I may just be totally punged from a full day of trying to
be on a plane that actually *lands* at O'Hare, but I just
can't stop giggling over this one...
-he shoots,
18 matches
Mail list logo
