On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:12:57AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 08/30/2010 08:36 PM, Adam Jiang wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43:44AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 08/30/2010 09:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 08/30/2010 03:45 AM, Adam Jiang wrote:
When I read the source in Linux kerne,
On 09/05/2010 08:17 PM, Dennis wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm using gentoo distribution (including gmp/mpfr/mpc) that could compile
gcc-4.5.0, 4.5.1, and many snapshots correctly, including the recent one
gcc-4.5-20100902,
but when I tried to compile gcc-4.6, any snapshot version, even recent
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
• The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library
builds.
--- On Mon, 6/9/10, Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?
To: Dennis crq...@fedoraproject.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, crq...@ymail.com
Date: Monday, 6 September, 2010, 9:18 AM
On
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Cheng Rk crq...@ymail.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 6/9/10, Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?
To: Dennis crq...@fedoraproject.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
2010/9/6 Basile Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 06:36:48 +0300
Laurynas Biveinis laurynas.bivei...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/2 Basile Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net:
Hello Laurynas, Diego all the list.
A precise question about gengtype (the current trunk
Hi,
Doloop optimization fails to be applied on the following inner loop
when compiling for PowerPC (GCC -r162294) due to:
Doloop: number of iterations too costly to compute.
strength reduction is performed in ivopts, introducing new variable:
for (p = inptr; p something; p += 3)
...
i want a a gcc
6.9.2010 6:17, Dennis kirjoitti:
I'm using gentoo distribution (including gmp/mpfr/mpc) that could compile
gcc-4.5.0, 4.5.1, and many snapshots correctly, including the recent one
gcc-4.5-20100902,
but when I tried to compile gcc-4.6, any snapshot version, even recent
gcc-4.6-20100904,
it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
• The
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
From
On 9/6/2010 9:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrikenightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guentherrguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Do you have a pointer to
Apologies for the trivial question - I haven't worked on GCC for a while.
I fixed PR libobjc/19850. I guess I'm supposed to resolve the bug now but I
don't seem to have
the permissions to do it in bugzilla (my email is
nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com).
Can that be enabled ? :-)
Apologies it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Nicola Pero
nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com wrote:
Apologies for the trivial question - I haven't worked on GCC for a while.
I fixed PR libobjc/19850. I guess I'm supposed to resolve the bug now but I
don't seem to have
the permissions to do it in bugzilla
You should be able to use your @gcc.gnu.org account which has full
permissions to close bugs. Just use the forgot password on your
@gcc.gnu.org account. If that does not work, is the email that your
@gcc account is being forward to correct. Use ssh gcc.gnu.org email
I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who
I can work with?
Thanks.
Regards,
-Tom
Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Niceville, Florida
USA
Anton reports that GCC fails to build on FreeBSD/ia64. Any ideas
on what to try? I assume it's just a small change that caused this
regression (this used to work some releases ago).
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/gcc'
gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
Anton reports that GCC fails to build on FreeBSD/ia64. Any ideas
on what to try? I assume it's just a small change that caused this
regression (this used to work some releases ago).
gmake[4]: Entering directory
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 06:33 ---
In G++ 4.6+ you can do:
int i;
unsigned j;
template class T
void
bar (const T t)
{
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wtype-limits
if (t 0)
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
{
i++;
--- Comment #5 from noloader at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 06:45 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
In G++ 4.6+ you can do:
int i;
unsigned j;
template class T
void
bar (const T t)
{
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wtype-limits
if (t 0)
#pragma GCC
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 06:48 ---
I thought Stallman hated those things
The reason why Stallman hated them is that they did not work with macros and
that changed with C99 adding support of _Pragma which can be used in macros
now. So his argument
--- Comment #2 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-09-06 07:12
---
(In reply to comment #1)
__is_iterator can be useful anyway,
Of course, they should use the same helper classes but they can coexist,
although the 2 current uses of is_iterator would disappear. I was
--- Comment #38 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 07:49
---
(In reply to comment #33)
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00375.html
Thanks for fixing it. And sorry for not testing it thoroughly.
--
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 08:23 ---
I have a patch for i386 failure.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 08:57
---
Subject: Bug 44919
Author: amonakov
Date: Mon Sep 6 08:56:43 2010
New Revision: 163904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163904
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/44919
* sel-sched.c
--- Comment #9 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 09:00
---
(In reply to comment #7)
Any progress with the copyright assignment?
The copyright assignment is renewed, and I have committed the patch to the
current development branch on Andrey's behalf. It will be
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-06 09:42
---
(In reply to comment #2)
It doesn't seem less conforming than what is used for
next/prev.
Well, I think we are comparing two changes of very different impact and size.
In the case of next / prev we have two
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 09:48 ---
Subject: Bug 45543
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 6 09:48:10 2010
New Revision: 163907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163907
Log:
PR testsuite/45543
*
--- Comment #6 from pacho at condmat1 dot ciencias dot uniovi dot es
2010-09-06 10:45 ---
This is what I get with gcc-4.5.1:
root 651 0.0 0.1 13080 1780 tty1 S+ 19:18 0:00
usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.1/cc1 -quiet - -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-march=pentium-m
For me, gmp and ppl are both in non-standard and different locations given via
--with-gmp/--with-ppl to gcc's configure
'make bootstrap' results in
suncc -g -DIN_GCC-DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-Wl,-R/pf/m/m222086/xas/solaris10/gcc/libe
lf-latest/lib
--- Comment #4 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-09-06 11:01
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Well, I think we are comparing two changes of very different impact and size.
You are right.
I would argue tha,
in general, the way we are living the post-concepts era, this is
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 11:06
---
Ok, I reproduced a failure (but none of the kind reported here) and have a fix
for that issue. Maybe it fixes this bug too, which I still can't reproduce.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-06 11:42
---
Nice that we agree on many points. Anyway, my plan would be (I cannot resist ;)
preparing a small prototype, using the hierarchy, attach it here, and wait for
Jon' opinion. Then we can make the final
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 12:02 ---
i386 failure is a real PR22152 regression, masked by wrong scan regexp. I'll
reopen PR22152.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 12:05 ---
Reopened due to 4.6 regression, see [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00529.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 12:15
---
Subject: Bug 45534
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 6 12:14:02 2010
New Revision: 163913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163913
Log:
2010-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #6 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-09-06 12:21
---
(In reply to comment #5)
preparing a small prototype, using the hierarchy, attach it here
Just to make sure, does that mean you are writing the prototype, or do you want
me to? (my employer started the
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-06 12:32
---
Me, me ;) But, to be clear, your help here and elsewhere would be more than
welcome. If there is something I can do about the paperwork, just let me know!
--
--- Comment #44 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-06
13:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=21709)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21709action=view)
retain redefinition of MAIN_STACK_BOUNDARY as required
--
howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
The -fipa-sra option may result in object code changes. Users should be
notified of such changes so they can make source code changes.
--
Summary: Add warnings for changes to code with option -fipa-sra
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 13:35 ---
DONE:
- POPPAR, POPCNT [and LEADZ/TAILZ already in GCC 4.4]
- IALL, IANY, IPARITY
TODO (cf. comment 2)
a) F2008's bit intrinsics: DSHIFTL, DSHIFTR, SHIFTA, SHIFTL, SHIFTR, MASKL,
MASKR, BGE, BGT, BLE, BLT,
As of now, gcc builds with gmp, mpfr, and mpc source directories placed in the
gcc tree by the user. Adding the other two main prerequisites into the tree
for full gcc features would be a win for users. The inter-dependence of the
configuration options between the latter two and gmp, mpfr, and
cc1plus segfaults on the attached testcase with -flto -O1
-finline-small-functions -fpartial-inlining.
$ g++-4.6 -v -flto -O1 -finline-small-functions -fpartial-inlining TC.cpp
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.6
--- Comment #1 from alexey at feldgendler dot ru 2010-09-06 13:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=21710)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21710action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45557
--- Comment #2 from alexey at feldgendler dot ru 2010-09-06 13:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=21711)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21711action=view)
Incomplete assembly file cc1plus manages to write before segfaulting
--
--- Comment #3 from alexey at feldgendler dot ru 2010-09-06 13:51 ---
$ gdb --args /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/cc1plus -v
-D_GNU_SOURCE TC.cpp -dumpbase TC.cpp -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase TC
-O1 -version -flto -finline-small-functions
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 13:53 ---
*** Bug 45557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 13:53 ---
Seems to be fixed by
2010-09-02 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/44937
PR tree-optimization/45412
* ipa-split.c (split_function): Properly remove PHI nodes.
***
--- Comment #45 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-06
13:57 ---
(In reply to comment #44)
Created an attachment (id=21709)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21709action=view) [edit]
retain redefinition of MAIN_STACK_BOUNDARY as required
Testsuite
--- Comment #5 from alexey at feldgendler dot ru 2010-09-06 14:03 ---
Indeed, the patch fixes this bug for me. Thanks!
--
alexey at feldgendler dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #46 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-06 14:04 ---
gfortran.dg/backspace_1.f, gfortran.dg/record_marker_2.f, ...
They are pr45534 and probably fixed at revision 163913 (testing).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36502
--- Comment #15 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 14:12
---
I tried compiling the testcase from comment #8 and it did not fail for
me either on i686-linux ox x86_64-linux. Can you please check that it
still fails for you?
--
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 14:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=21712)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21712action=view)
New draft patch
New draft patch.
New: Documentation added; REAL_KINDS and REAL_KINDS(1) works now.
TODO
- The
--- Comment #39 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 14:54 ---
Subject: Bug 45524
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Sep 6 14:52:54 2010
New Revision: 163921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163921
Log:
Don't set enable_decimal_float to dpd if DFP is disabled.
config/
The code snippet below fails to compile:
=~=
template typename S, typename T
struct C
{
template typename U
struct B
{
template typename W
struct E
{
explicit E(const W x) : w(x) {}
const W w;
};
};
};
struct F;
template typename X
struct D
{
D() {}
};
const
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 15:00 ---
This was forwarded here from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620095
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45558
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 15:08 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00469.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
With the following program:
#include stdio.h
int
main()
{
unsigned int t = 254733465;
float f;
f = (float) t;
printf (t=%u f=%.0f\n, t, f);
}
I get with gcc 4.3 the expected result:
t=254733465 f=254733472
but with gcc 4.4.5:
t=254733465 f=482062944
which is clearly wrong.
Note:
Richard wrote in IRC:
fortran needs a pretty-printer
gfc_show_expr is annoying as it doesn't flush and you have to manually set
dumpfile
to stdout
Untested draft patch:
Index: dump-parse-tree.c
===
---
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-09-06 15:56 ---
I can confirm this with 20100902 from the 4.5 branch. the profiled bootstrap
did work with the 4.5.1 release.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #3 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 15:57 ---
Subject: Bug 19850
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Sep 6 15:57:44 2010
New Revision: 163923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163923
Log:
PR libobjc/19850
* gthr-posix.h
--- Comment #4 from nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com 2010-09-06
15:58 ---
I fixed this bug in trunk (will be GCC 4.6.0).
--
nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
With revision 163809 these test passed.
From revision 163818 and on, the tests have failed as follows:
Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/cpp.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/pragma-float-const-decimal64-1.c (test for warnings, line 4)
...
Running
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 16:08 ---
Correct title, possibly component, milestone.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-09-06
16:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] Ada bootstrap failure on IRIX 6.5: SIGBUS in
sem_aggr.sort_case_table
Unfortunately, even with your patch the mips-sgi-irix6.5 Ada bootstrap
is still broken.
Rainer
--- Comment #16 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 16:57
---
(In reply to comment #15)
Ulrih, I've just wanted to post the following when I found that you already
posted analogous conclusion. I should have been on CC to see your comment
right away. The problem is
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-06 17:08
---
Created an attachment (id=21713)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21713action=view)
Draft patch, tested x86_64-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45549
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 17:10 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45524 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #40 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 17:10
---
*** Bug 45561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-09-06 17:15 ---
Dupe of PR44631?
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #41 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 17:18
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-09-06 17:48
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Draft patch, tested x86_64-linux
Nice. Just to confirm, that's indeed what I had in mind, except that I was
going to rename __is_iterator_helper to __has_iterator_category and move
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45559
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 17:51 ---
Subject: Bug 22152
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 6 17:51:12 2010
New Revision: 163926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163926
Log:
PR target/22152
* config/i386/mmx.md
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 17:55 ---
Subject: Bug 22152
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 6 17:54:46 2010
New Revision: 163927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163927
Log:
PR target/22152
* gcc.target/i386/pr22152.c (add3):
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 17:55 ---
More failures:
use iso_fortran_env
integer :: i
print *, shape(real_kinds(1)) ! should be rejected (scalar)
i = real_kinds(1) ! ICE
end
Thus, the FE has problems if one takes a REF of an EXPR_ARRAY,
--- Comment #15 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:07 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Subject: Bug 45534
New Revision: 163913
2010-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/45534
* tree-ssa-address.c (create_mem_ref_raw): Add
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 18:13 ---
Fixed again.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:17 ---
Subject: Bug 45560
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:16:50 2010
New Revision: 163928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163928
Log:
2010-09-06 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:17 ---
FIXED for 4.6.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:25
---
Created an attachment (id=21714)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21714action=view)
Patch to address IPA-CP parameter removal issues
This patch makes IPA-CP to refrain from modifying a function
--- Comment #16 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-06 18:27 ---
New Revision: 163913
fixed on i686-darwin9.
also on x86_64-apple-darwin10.4 configured with --enable-checking=release.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534
--- Comment #5 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:30 ---
Fixed in trunk.
Thanks
--
nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-06
18:40 ---
Still present for x86_64-unknown-gnu-linux with -m32 at r163927 when tested on
x86_64 Fedora 10
using the new gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/alloca-5.c test case
only from
--- Comment #17 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:43 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
This patch makes IPA-CP to refrain from modifying a function when it
sees a any type attributes.
In a way that's unfortunate: Both fn attr and argument removal are
optimization options.
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:44 ---
Subject: Bug 45200
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:44:23 2010
New Revision: 163929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163929
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #2 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:44 ---
Subject: Bug 45558
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:44:23 2010
New Revision: 163929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163929
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:44 ---
Subject: Bug 45293
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:44:23 2010
New Revision: 163929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163929
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #12 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:50 ---
Subject: Bug 45200
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:49:46 2010
New Revision: 163930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163930
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #10 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:50 ---
Subject: Bug 45293
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:49:46 2010
New Revision: 163930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163930
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:50 ---
Subject: Bug 45558
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:49:46 2010
New Revision: 163930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163930
Log:
Patch PR c++/45200
Fix PR c++/45200, c++/45293, c++/45558
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 18:52 ---
Subject: Bug 45560
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:51:48 2010
New Revision: 163931
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163931
Log:
2010-09-06 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
Command line:
$ gcc -std=gnu++0x -O -fno-inline -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug
testcase.C
Related valgrind output:
$ valgrind -q --trace-children=yes
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-163921-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/bin/gcc
-std=gnu++0x -O1 -fno-inline -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone
--- Comment #1 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-09-06 19:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=21715)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21715action=view)
reduced testcase (from
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/range_access.cc)
$ gcc -std=gnu++0x -O
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 19:44 ---
Subject: Bug 34145
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Sep 6 19:43:58 2010
New Revision: 163932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163932
Log:
2010-09-06 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 19:44 ---
Fixed on trunk, closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
