[Bug libstdc++/100249] missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp

2021-04-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > when the type of __proj_val is an rvalue reference, we need to convert it to > rvalue for the next std::__invoke call: https://godbolt.org/z/1G7aqxs3c. More simple case:

[Bug rtl-optimization/100253] New: [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp -ftree-slp-vectorize (unaligned movdqa)

2021-04-24 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253 Bug ID: 100253 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp -ftree-slp-vectorize (unaligned movdqa) Product: gcc Version: 12.0

Re: [PATCH] [Refactor] [AVX512] Combine VI12_AVX512VL with VI48_AVX512VL into VI_AVX512VLBW

2021-04-24 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:57 AM Hongtao Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:28 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > > > On 11/30/20 10:17 PM, Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Hi: > > > There're many pairs of define_insn/define_expand that are very similar > > > to each other except mode

[Bug c++/100252] New: Internal compiler error during template instantiation

2021-04-24 Thread sand at rifkin dot dev via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252 Bug ID: 100252 Summary: Internal compiler error during template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/98911] Add folding and remove expanders for x86 *pcmp{et,gt}* builtins

2021-04-24 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC12.

[Bug target/98911] Add folding and remove expanders for x86 *pcmp{et,gt}* builtins

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c54a9f7259fce1a221270f21d8076c960c7d0163 commit r12-110-gc54a9f7259fce1a221270f21d8076c960c7d0163 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Feb

[PATCH] analyzer: fix ICE on NULL change.m_expr [PR100244]

2021-04-24 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
PR analyzer/100244 reports an ICE on a -Wanalyzer-free-of-non-heap due to a case where free_of_non_heap::describe_state_change can be passed a NULL change.m_expr for a suitably complicated symbolic value. Bulletproof it by checking for change.m_expr being NULL before dereferencing it.

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

2021-04-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: |[11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61bfff562e3b6091d5a0a412a7d496bd523868a8 commit r12-108-g61bfff562e3b6091d5a0a412a7d496bd523868a8 Author: David Malcolm Date:

gcc-10-20210424 is now available

2021-04-24 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-10-20210424 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20210424/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

2021-04-24 Thread peter at int19h dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #214 from Peter Bisroev --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #213) > Does this still happen with GCC 8 or above? Hi Andrew, yes it does from my last tests. As we have found out here, before newer versions of GCC can work on

Possibly minor pessimisation at -O2 for logical-AND'd branch statements

2021-04-24 Thread Soul Studios
The following: #include int main() { const bool a =(rand() % 20) > 5; const bool b =(rand() & 1) == 1; int x = rand() % 5, y = rand() % 2, z = rand() % 3, c = rand() % 4, d = rand() % 5; if (a & b) d = y * c; else if (a & !b) c = 2 * d; else if (!a &

[Bug ada/100251] New: Byte order mark in gnat.adc raises compilation error

2021-04-24 Thread stephen.sangwine at btinternet dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100251 Bug ID: 100251 Summary: Byte order mark in gnat.adc raises compilation error Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/100250] New: ICE related to -Wmaybe-uninitialized

2021-04-24 Thread muecker at gwdg dot de via Gcc-bugs
-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: muecker at gwdg dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50670 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50670=edit minimized test case (possibly also affects 11.0) xgcc (GCC) 12.0.0 20210

RE: [RFC] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

2021-04-24 Thread David Laight via Gcc-patches
From: Alexei Starovoitov > Sent: 24 April 2021 00:20 > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:15 PM Alejandro Colomar > wrote: > > > > Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral > > types 'uint32_t', but some aren't. There are some using kernel > > syntax '__u32'. Fix those. > > > > Some

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

2021-04-24 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- FIled https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia_bug/3299227

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2021-04-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6) > Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain > __fp16 like the test in r11-7864. PR 99787 also has a testcase that could be done too.

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 50669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50669=edit Patch that works around the clang issue/bug this is against GCC-11.1rc2, but not likely to need much/any amendment for

[Bug fortran/100158] Some issues with fortran testsuite files

2021-04-24 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100158 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The files testsuite/substr_{9,10}.f90 were moved by Tobias: r12-68-gac456fd981db6b0c2f7ee1ab0d17d36087a74dc2

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

2021-04-24 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

2021-04-24 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2021-04-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain __fp16 like the test in r11-7864.

[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

2021-04-24 Thread taraba.peter at mail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 --- Comment #5 from Peter Taraba --- Also, not sure if this info helps, but this bug does not seem to appear with gcc 10.2 (I tried it on Manjaro KDE Plasma linux). So it's probably some new code which came after 10.2. Cheers.

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0e7833b94953ba6b4a915150666969ad9fc66af commit r12-107-gd0e7833b94953ba6b4a915150666969ad9fc66af Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

2021-04-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe --- unfortunately, wider testing showed sanitiser fails - so this has been reverted for now.

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32c4d970ea3a9fc330d6aa8fd83f9dae0b9afc64 commit r12-106-g32c4d970ea3a9fc330d6aa8fd83f9dae0b9afc64 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

Re: [pushed] Darwin : Adjust darwin_binds_local_p for PIC code [PR100152].

2021-04-24 Thread Iain Sandoe
Iain Sandoe wrote: gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/100152 * config/darwin.c (darwin_binds_local_p): Assume that any public symbol might be interposed for PIC code. Update function header comment to reflect current Darwin capability. unfortunately, wider testing

[Bug libstdc++/100249] New: missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp

2021-04-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249 Bug ID: 100249 Summary: missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: [Patch] PR fortran/100218 - target of pointer from evaluation of function-reference

2021-04-24 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches
Hi Paul, > Is there a test for an error with -std=f2003? If not, you should, perhaps, > include one. after checking for the corresponding error message, I found that ptr-func-2.f90 already covers this case. Considering this, I'll rename the current testcase from pr100218.f90 to ptr-func-4.f90.

Re: [RFC] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

2021-04-24 Thread Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) via Gcc-patches
Hello Alexei, On 4/24/21 1:20 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: Nack. The man page should describe the kernel api the way it is in .h file. Why? When glibc uses __size_t (or any other non-standard types) just because the standard doesn't allow it to define some types in some specific header,

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

2021-04-24 Thread johelegp at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 --- Comment #11 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Thank you. But the first CE link: https://godbolt.org/z/cPWdGW, and with the addition in Comment 2: https://godbolt.org/z/Gezh5h5W4, they still ICE.

[Bug c++/100248] New: ICE with global "default" keyword

2021-04-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100248 Bug ID: 100248 Summary: ICE with global "default" keyword Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/100247] New: x86-64 bad register allocation for unsigned type

2021-04-24 Thread ammarfaizi2 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100247 Bug ID: 100247 Summary: x86-64 bad register allocation for unsigned type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: [Patch] PR fortran/100218 - target of pointer from evaluation of function-reference

2021-04-24 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches
Hi Harald, Another good one - OK for master but wait a while for 11-branch. I am a bit hesitant about 10-branch because this is not a regression. That said, this is harmless because it is permissive, so I will leave it to you to decide. Is there a test for an error with -std=f2003? If not, you

Re: [Patch] PR fortran/100154 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

2021-04-24 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches
Hi Harald, It looks good to me! Keep clear of 11-branch until release but OK for the others. Thanks Paul On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 00:18, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: > Now with the correct patch attached ... > > Sorry for the confusion! > > --- > > Dear Fortranners, > > we need to check

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

2021-04-24 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50668 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50668=edit Smaller reproducer Ok, I figured out how to find the location of the error. In this case, it's caused by using the modulo

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-darwin12, |

[Bug bootstrap/100246] New: [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Bug ID: 100246 Summary: [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13] Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2021-04-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- I can't reproduce this with latest trunk :-(. Bisecting...

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2021-04-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Single, hopefully valid TU, no LTO needed: $ gcc -march=armv8-a -fPIC -O3 100241.c -fvisibility=internal -c 100241.c: In function ‘vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row’: 100241.c:32:1: error: unable to

[Bug target/82735] _mm256_zeroupper does not invalidate previously computed registers

2021-04-24 Thread noloader at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- Add 9.3 to the know to fail list: $ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

[Bug target/82735] _mm256_zeroupper does not invalidate previously computed registers

2021-04-24 Thread noloader at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton --- I think we are seeing this bug in the field. We are catching lots of failed self tests as we test on multiple platforms, including Ubuntu 14 ERS and Ubuntu 16 LTS. The problem makes GCC 4.8.4 through 7.5

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2021-04-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Now reproduced with a single file. Reducing that...

[PATCH][_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] libbacktrace integration

2021-04-24 Thread François Dumont via Gcc-patches
Hi     Here is the patch to add backtrace generation on _GLIBCXX_DEBUG assertions thanks to libbacktrace.     In addition to this integration I am also improving the generation of the assertion message thanks to the "%.*s" printf format, it avoids an intermediate buffer most of the time. I

[PATCH] Synchronize Rocket Lake's processor_names and processor_cost_table with processor_type

2021-04-24 Thread Cui, Lili via Gcc-patches
Hi Uros, This patch is to synchronize Rocket Lake's processor_names and processor_cost_table with processor_type. Bootstrap is ok, and no regressions for i386/x86-64 testsuite. OK for master? [PATCH] Synchronize Rocket Lake's processor_names and processor_cost_table with processor_type

[pushed] Darwin : Adjust darwin_binds_local_p for PIC code [PR100152].

2021-04-24 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Darwin's dynamic linker supports interposition and lazy symbol binding. If we are generating PIC code and a symbol is public, then it could potentially be indirected via a lazy-resolver stub; we cannot tell at compile-time if this will be done (since the indirection can be the result of

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #43 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 commit r12-103-gb6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|8.5 --- Comment #42 from Iain Sandoe

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

2021-04-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

2021-04-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-24

[Bug c++/88580] Parameter pack expansion fails (variadic constructor template inside a variadic class template)

2021-04-24 Thread rustamabd at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580 Rustam Abdullaev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rustamabd at gmail dot com ---

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100245 - ICE on automatic reallocation

2021-04-24 Thread José Rui Faustino de Sousa via Gcc-patches
Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100245 - ICE on automatic reallocation. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add an if clause for handling derived types in the left hand side. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix ICE with automatic reallocation [PR100136]

[Bug fortran/100245] New: ICE on automatic reallocation

2021-04-24 Thread jrfsousa at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
ved type. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210424 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210424 (prerelease) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210424 GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210424 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug analyzer/100244] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

2021-04-24 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 Bug ID: 100244 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/96796] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: ICE during RTL pass: reload

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e720d3033f84802147d2da9e923bd862cdb73164 commit r10-9764-ge720d3033f84802147d2da9e923bd862cdb73164 Author: Richard

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED