https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70308
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I found this while looking into PR 56873.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56873
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This looks to be fixed in GCC 5.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
Bug ID: 101609
Summary: no right shift pattern for vector(2) long long on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I noticed gimple loop code invariant motion is causing comment #0 to be
really bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #41 from Eric Gallager ---
Would this package help at all? https://github.com/blacktop/go-macho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101608
Bug ID: 101608
Summary: ranges::fill/fill_n missing
std::is_constant_evaluated() condition for
__builtin_memset
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101498
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101486
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note GCC accepts the following while both clang and ICC don't:
template
void f1(const T(*)[10]);
template
void f2(T(*)[]);
void bar(int (*ptr)[10]) {
f1(ptr);
f2(ptr);
}
So GCC at least is doing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101486
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang and ICC reject this.
clang error message:
:9:5: error: no matching function for call to 'f2'
f2(ptr); // rejects
^~
:5:6: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'type-parameter-0-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> The difference is that we include ::remove in C++11 and later.
You had even forgot you filed PR 57576 for that :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 57576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57576
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-05-26 00:00:00 |2021-7-23
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
Configured with: /tmp/tmp.7yrVYtTGDZ-gcc-builder/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210723 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32385
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang also rejects this:
:3:34: error: 'A::(unnamed struct at :3:34)' cannot be defined
in a type specifier
template void foo(int = ((struct { int i; }) {0}).i);
^
:3:57:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43561
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
For the first case, GCC 11 accepts it finally.
For the second case, GCC 11 accepts it only for -std=c++20 .
clang accepts both cases even for -std=c++98.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicholas.muggio at sdl dot
usu.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 79419, which changed state.
Bug 79419 Summary: [concepts] Explicit specialization of constrained member
template: ICE in set_constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79419
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 85991, which changed state.
Bug 85991 Summary: [Concepts] Template placeholder: ICE cp_parser_lookup_name,
at cp/parser.c:26223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85991
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85991
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 86000, which changed state.
Bug 86000 Summary: ICE with requires statement in a non constexpr if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86000
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Still ICEs on current trunk with -std=c++17 -fconcepts, and also with
> -std=c++2a after modernising the code:
I can't get this to crash with r12-2133.
But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is there an updated preprocessed source somewhere as I get a lot of:
expression must be enclosed in parentheses
For the concepts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87774
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pogonyshev at gmx dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
Resolution|---
algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210723 (experimental) [master revision
:3eeaf64a5:01ac2f08b0105a1c85425d0e59216eb528c6d2ab] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
union {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89553
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||55004
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79189
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4131
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.3, 4.7.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
Snapshot gcc-10-20210723 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20210723/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101606
Bug ID: 101606
Summary: std::sort generates different function for
__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator and int*
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85104
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely we are trying to underline the other const but for some reason it
has the wrong location.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84692
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 83928, which changed state.
Bug 83928 Summary: implicit conversion of literal class type to unscoped
enumeration can not be used as array size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83928
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||55004
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83484
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Clang gives (which does not make sense at all):
:12:46: error: declaration of constexpr static data member 'High'
requires an initializer
template<> constexpr Port<7>::Value Port<7>::High;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
There's another bug here that can be reproduced with the following slightly
modified version of the original test case:
$ cat pr101600-c2.C && /build/gcc-master/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-master/gcc -O2
-S
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:33:09 -0600
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 7/22/2021 5:15 PM, Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > From: Sergei Trofimovich
> >
> > r12-1804 ("cp: add support for per-location warning groups.") among other
> > things removed warning suppression from a few places including
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-09-07 00:00:00 |2021-7-23
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65132
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rrrlasse at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81152
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 89960, which changed state.
Bug 89960 Summary: Implicit derived to base conversion considered type punning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89960
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cassio.neri at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81152
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56456
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78280
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zoltan at hidvegi dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78246
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang fails the same way.
On 7/23/21 8:15 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Sandra,
On 21.07.21 12:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 13.07.21 23:28, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
ISO_Fortran_binding.h is now generated in the libgfortran build
directory where it is on the default include path. Adjust includes in
the gfortran testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 69375, which changed state.
Bug 69375 Summary: GCC allows PMF type "void (T::*)()" to be caught as "void
(T::*)() const"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric at efcs dot ca
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56337
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
From: Andrew Pinski
The problem here is the x86_64 back-end uses a signed integer
for alignment and then divides by BITS_PER_UNIT so if we had
INT_MIN (which is what 1<<28*8 is), we would get the wrong result.
This fixes the problem by using unsigned for the argument to
x86_output_aligned_bss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98038
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555760.html
I've done a current bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64/powerpc64le with no
regressions.
-Pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-23
Summary|invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 80575, which changed state.
Bug 80575 Summary: unnecessary virtual function table support in member
function call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80575
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80575
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
