https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
Der Harald, hi all,
On 11.08.21 21:25, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
the checks for the STAT= and ERRMSG= arguments to the coarray SYNC statements
did not properly handle several cases, such as named constants (parameters).
While fixing this, I adjusted the code similarly to what was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59968
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think most of these have been fixed. For an example comment #19 was fixed in
r12-1525
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael at talosis dot ca
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aivchenk at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56298
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |libstdc++
Summary|No option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.5.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
const int sse_load[5];/* cost of loading SSE register
in 32bit, 64bit, 128bit, 256bit and 512bit
*/
const int sse_store[5]; /* cost of storing SSE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33587
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
cpplib-11.1-b20210207.de.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/de.po
(This file,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
As I've mentioned before, the H8/300H can only shift a single bit
position at a time. Naturally this means many shifts are implemented as
loops. There's a variety of special cases that we can do without loops
by using rotates, sub-word moves, etc. The general guidance for the
port has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25690
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.slater at freescale dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91883
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92574
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85017
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-08-22 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
> On Aug 14, 2021, at 5:25 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> 1/ please can you either post using a mailer that doesn’t mangle patches or
> put the patch as a plain text attachment
> (pushing to a git branch somewhere public also works for me, but maybe not
> for all reviewers)
> - for small
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-09-12 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-04-06 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
CC|
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 2:08 PM Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
> unfortunately, things are considerably worse: syscall.lo fails to build
> and go1 even ICEs:
>
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_posix_utimesnano.go:13:1:
> error: redefinition of ‘UtimesNano’
>13 | func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-09-03 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97464
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||88854
Last reconfirmed|2020-10-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-06-29 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-05-04 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94914
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 94877, which changed state.
Bug 94877 Summary: Failure to simplify ~(x + 1) to -2 - x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94877
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||96685
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85559
Bug 85559 depends on bug 65492, which changed state.
Bug 65492 Summary: Bad optimization in -O3 due to if-conversion and/or unrolling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-10 00:00:00 |2021-8-14
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
Snapshot gcc-11-20210814 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20210814/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
On 8/15/21 12:25 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 12:05:37AM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On 8/15/21 12:03 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi All,
On 5/1/21 11:11 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
Changes from v1:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101913
--- Comment #3 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >-1L << 63 is LONG_MIN
> No it is undefined and has an overflow bit on it.
> You want (long)(-1UL << 63) for it be correct.
> But the warning is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 12:05:37AM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> On 8/15/21 12:03 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > On 5/1/21 11:11 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > > Changes from v1:
> > > >- Added patch to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stafford Horne :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da8a9d695b3c4b9397b5d9a27660bfa48af8d707
commit r12-2910-gda8a9d695b3c4b9397b5d9a27660bfa48af8d707
Author: Stafford Horne
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stafford Horne :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eff8110674ef193481d3657456a262beeb9951ff
commit r12-2909-geff8110674ef193481d3657456a262beeb9951ff
Author: Stafford Horne
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101913
eggert at cs dot ucla.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51304|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54345
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
There has been so many changes to this code since GCC 4.8.0 dealing with the
allocations of this pointer. I can't tell if this has been fixed really.
On 8/15/21 12:03 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi All,
On 5/1/21 11:11 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
Changes from v1:
- Added patch to enabled cmodle=large on crtstuff
This series fixes some bugs found when linking large binaries,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 5/1/21 11:11 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > Changes from v1:
> > - Added patch to enabled cmodle=large on crtstuff
> >
> > This series fixes some bugs found when linking large binaries, both in
> > buildroot
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101916
Bug ID: 101916
Summary: SH4 ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program
cc1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
The TypeCheckExpr creates a new TyTy::BoolType for a
ComparisonExpr. This new BoolType is unknown to TyTyResolveCompile
which causes a crash when trying to compile the inferred new
BoolType. The new "bools_eq.rs" testcase uses several bools which show
this issue. Resolve this by looking up the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83827
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83123
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83123
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is now optimized at the gimple level to just:
_7 = a_3(D) & b_4(D);
_8 = _7 < 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83123
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82729
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915
Bug ID: 101915
Summary: Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82356
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52781
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
4.7.0+, uses ud_dce and rtl_dce as the name of the RTL dumps now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52781
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
Giulio Benetti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101914
Bug ID: 101914
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15553
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Hi All,
On 5/1/21 11:11 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
Changes from v1:
- Added patch to enabled cmodle=large on crtstuff
This series fixes some bugs found when linking large binaries, both in buildroot
and glibc testing.
Stafford Horne (2):
or1k: Add mcmodel option to handle large GOTs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101913
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>-1L << 63 is LONG_MIN
No it is undefined and has an overflow bit on it.
You want (long)(-1UL << 63) for it be correct.
But the warning is still there.
I thought -fsanitize=undefined enabled -fwrapv too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101913
Bug ID: 101913
Summary: -Wstrict-overflow -O3 false alarm on tzdb localtime.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101911
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970
--- Comment #12 from Martin Uecker ---
Another version of the patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/577402.html
Here is an update version of the patch. I now reorder
only the gimplification and not other preparation so that
replacing PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs for Ada should continue
to work. I also removed a call to gimplify_type_sizes
somewhere else, which also caused some similar problemes.
This seems to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100406
Bug 100406 depends on bug 101791, which changed state.
Bug 101791 Summary: missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array
forms of new and delete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96194a07bdbc57dd9733892a791d87dbe25f0802
commit r12-2908-g96194a07bdbc57dd9733892a791d87dbe25f0802
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo