https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95752
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101993
Bug ID: 101993
Summary: Potential vectorization opportunity when condition
checks array address
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
I've backported several patches having to do with Fortran/C
interoperability from mainline to the OG11 branch. See attached log for
details.
-Sandra
commit d554155c07771935778f557e9ef649cc3624d1ce
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date: Wed Aug 11 19:24:17 2021 -0700
Fortran: Fix c_float128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101992
Bug ID: 101992
Summary: new object was created erroneously when co_await on
function call that return lvalue reference
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101991
Bug ID: 101991
Summary: bit_and or bit_ior with an invariant inside loop is
not pulled out of the loop
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-02-14 00:00:00 |2021-8-19
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990
Bug ID: 101990
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Another testcase is from pr91796
__m256d copysign2_pd(__m256d from, __m256d to) {
auto a = _mm256_castpd_si256(from);
auto avx_signbit =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101989
Bug ID: 101989
Summary: Fail to optimize (a & b) | (c & ~b) to vpternlog
instruction.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
Hi Martin,
on 2021/8/20 上午12:30, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 8/19/21 9:03 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 8/18/21 11:56 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> on 2021/8/19 上午11:26, David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi, Martin
A few PowerPC-specific testcases started failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91796
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91796
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
In GCC 5-8 we produced:
vpcmpeqd%ymm2, %ymm2, %ymm2
vpsllq $63, %ymm2, %ymm2
vandnpd %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
vandpd %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
vorpd %ymm1, %ymm0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90774
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-06-07 00:00:00 |2021-8-19
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
--- Comment #5 from Dietmar May ---
I've confirmed that the issue is present in binutils 2.36.1, but not 2.35.1
ARM / Linaro's aarch64 10.2.1 toolchain uses binutils 2.35.1
Their 10.3.1 toolchain uses binutils 2.36.1
By copying the 'as'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90774
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
testcase:
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
v4si square(v4si num, int y, int x, int h, int k, int w, int p, int j, int u) {
return num + 1 + k / 2 + p * 6234 + 75 * h + j / 3452 + 53 *
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:12 PM Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> > I am inclined to say that the Intel compiler has a bug by not
> > accepting it – but as written before, I regard sub-string length
> > (esp. with const expr) inquiries as an odd corner case which
> > is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96234
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:18 PM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> Whilst working on a backend patch, I noticed that the middle-end's
> RTL optimizers weren't simplifying a truncation of a paradoxical
> subreg extension, though it does transform closely related (more
> complex) expressions. The main
On 8/13/21 12:15 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Honestly, I don't see how it matters. So far as I can tell, all you've done
> here is hand-inlined what build_simple_mem_ref would do. So I guess I have
> a slight preference for your original patch (but with the new test case,
> of course).
Ok, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-08-11 00:00:00 |2021-8-19
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
Whilst working on a backend patch, I noticed that the middle-end's
RTL optimizers weren't simplifying a truncation of a paradoxical
subreg extension, though it does transform closely related (more
complex) expressions. The main (first) part of this patch
implements this simplification, reusing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe related to PR 82110 but there has been other CTAD changes in GCC 12 too.
The attached patch changes the new access warning pass to use
the per-function ranger instance. To do that it makes a number
of the global static functions members of the pass (that involved
moving one to a later point in the file, increasing the diff;
the body of the function hasn't changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I also noticed, GCC accepts while clang rejects:
> template struct A { A(T); };
> auto p = new A[]{A(1),A(1)};
>
> While changing it to [2], both GCC and clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I also noticed, GCC accepts while clang rejects:
template struct A { A(T); };
auto p = new A[]{A(1),A(1)};
While changing it to [2], both GCC and clang accepts it.
This patch adds a __PTX_ISA__ predefined macro to the nvptx backend that
allows code to check the compute model being targeted by the compiler.
This is equivalent to the __CUDA_ARCH__ macro defined by CUDA's nvcc
compiler, but to avoid causing problems for source code that checks
for that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Snapshot gcc-9-20210819 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20210819/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293
commit r12-3034-gb0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
On 8/19/2021 12:24 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
Whee, two more ports dropping stabs. Committed to the trunk.
Are you saying you're on a mission to stab wodden stakes into stabs?
Seems that way :-) I hadn't really set out to do that, but
Hi,
This patch is on behalf of John Henning, who opened PR 101843:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
He proposed the following doc change, please take a look and let me know
whether this is Okay for commit?
Thanks.
Qing
>From
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 06:10:46PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 06:11:03PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I think the current vector.md / altivec.md / vsx.md / rs6000.md
> > division is artificial at best. Most of the basic (movement etc.)
> > things are in
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 06:11:03PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 04:42:42PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > I wanted to give Segher a chance to comment on the structure.
>
> I think the current vector.md / altivec.md / vsx.md / rs6000.md
> division is artificial at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 57601, which changed state.
Bug 57601 Summary: Vector lowering could use larger modes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61105
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> $ cat xx.cpp && /build/gcc-60760/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-60760/gcc -S -Wall
> -Wextra -Wpedantic -o/dev/null xx.cpp
> constexpr void *operator new (__SIZE_TYPE__,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86440
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike ---
gcc 11.2 changes it somewhat:
a.c:1:5: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
[-Wignored-qualifiers]
1 | int const f() { return 0; }
| ^
a.c:3:13: warning: type qualifiers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988
Bug ID: 101988
Summary: Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced
class template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Hi,
I totally biffed the previous version of this patch, as it was built
against an experimental tree instead of trunk. Trying again...
Although safe_inc_pos avoids buffer overruns in rs6000-gen-builtins.c,
there are some other routines where we fail to detect the possibility.
Clean those up!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
Dietmar May changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Dietmar May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961
--- Comment #23 from xaizek ---
> it should be fixed in the updated version of the patch.
Yes, it is.
> Right now, one can easily detect JSON format with
> `gcov --help | grep json-format`, am I right? What type of capability would
> you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
--- Comment #2 from Dietmar May ---
$ /opt/linaro/10.3.1/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gcc -v -g src/boot.S -c
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/linaro/10.3.1/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gcc
Target: aarch64-none-elf
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101987
Bug ID: 101987
Summary: gcc 10.3.1 fails to generate debugging information for
aarch64 .S files
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101916
Thomas Petazzoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915
Thomas Petazzoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25671
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
With the fixed testcase we get:
movq%rsi, %rax
movq%rsi, %rcx
shrq$6, %rax
andl$63, %ecx
movq(%rdi,%rax,8), %rax
shrq%cl, %rax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25671
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note there is a bug in the original testcase.
It should be:
int test_bit(unsigned long *words, int bit)
{
int wsize = (sizeof *words) * 8;
return (words[bit / wsize] & (1ul << (bit % wsize))) != 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101952
Thomas Petazzoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Severity|normal
Hi!
Richard, maybe you have an opinion here, in particular about my
"SLP vectorizer" comment below? Please see
<87r1f2puss.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net">http://mid.mail-archive.com/87r1f2puss.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
for the full context.
On 2021-08-16T10:21:04+0200, Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101986
Bug ID: 101986
Summary: go, sparc64: Segmentation violation during kubernetes
build
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is fixed in GCC 10+ with the patches do do 64bit vector support in SSE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
Hi,
A while ago had a report of build failure against a Darwin branch on
the latest OS release. This was because (temporarily) the symlink
from libm.dylib => libSystem.dylib had been removed/omitted.
libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
even if that is (mostly)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Hi,
Although the cctools assembler is based of GNU GAS, it is from a
very old version (1.38) which does not support many of the features
that the target supports test is expecting***.
tested on i686 and x86_64 darwin versions using the cctools as.
OK for master?
thanks
Iain
*** I guess we
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:53:16PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> That said, I introduced
> the variable in r243470 to begin with and I consider its removal
> a trivially correct and appropriate part of refactoring.
It is not a refactoring. It changes behaviour.
Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982
--- Comment #3 from qingzhe huang ---
Thank you for clarifications!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 53101, which changed state.
Bug 53101 Summary: Recognize casts to sub-vectors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 01:16:16PM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 05:46:58PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > There are __builtin_set_fpscr_rn and friends, please use those, those
> > are optimised for any platform.
>
> I do. (Unless I missed an opportunity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101246
--- Comment #6 from Lance Fredrickson ---
So I compared runtime.inc in gcc 10.3 and gcc 11.1, and they have quite a bit
different. I tried using the runtime.inc file from 10.3 in 11.1, and it does
allow it to finish compiling, and I appear to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Teichert ---
After running out of disk space during stage2 of the gcc build, I now have a
gcc 11.2.0 compiled for sparc64:
ristkon:~> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-10-17 00:00:00 |2021-8-19
--- Comment #7 from Andrew
Hi Tobias,
> I am inclined to say that the Intel compiler has a bug by not
> accepting it – but as written before, I regard sub-string length
> (esp. with const expr) inquiries as an odd corner case which
> is unlikely to occur in real-world code.
ok.
> Still does not work – or rather:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d881460deb1f0bdfc3e8fa2d391a03a9763cbff4
commit r12-3033-gd881460deb1f0bdfc3e8fa2d391a03a9763cbff4
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
Hi,
Preface:
this is the last patch for now in my series - with this applied Darwin
reports the same results as Linux (at least, for modern x86_64
platform versions).
Note
a) that the expect expression in {fixed}host_execute seems to depend
on the assumption that the dejagnu.h output is used
On 8/19/21 9:36 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 09:03:44AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 8/18/21 11:56 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
To get rid of GTY variable alloc_object_size_limit looks suspicious,
maybe tree objects returned by alloc_max_size after the change
Hi,
This concerns the settings of flags (using the host makefile fragment) for
tools that will run on the host.
At present the (no)PIE flags are computed in gcc/configure but it is not
possible to override them (either from higher level Makefile or from the
command line). Secondly the ordering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
The changes in last night's patch to the new access warning pass
(somewhat prematurely) included a call to enable_ranger() with no
matching call to disable_ranger(). The two calls must be paired
in order for the latter to release resources allocated by
the former, otherwise the resources leak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81501087758cb0c32e555858cf367e449a09246e
commit r12-3031-g81501087758cb0c32e555858cf367e449a09246e
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-07-29 00:00:00 |2021-8-19
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
Hi,
It is intended that the default for the NeXT runtime at ABI 2 is to
check for nil message receivers. This updates this to match the
documented behaviour and to match the behaviour of the system tools.
tested on x86_64, i686-darwin, x86_64-linux,
pushed to master, thanks
Iain
Signed-off-by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85987
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
We are now able to handle the testcase in comment #0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101985
Bug ID: 101985
Summary: vec_cpsgn parameter order
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Whee, two more ports dropping stabs. Committed to the trunk.
Are you saying you're on a mission to stab wodden stakes into stabs?
SCNR :-)
Gerald
On 6/28/2021 1:16 AM, CHIGOT, CLEMENT wrote:
On 6/23/2021 12:53 AM, CHIGOT, CLEMENT via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi David,
Did you have a chance to take look at this patch ?
Thanks,
Clément
+DavidMalcolm
Can you review this patch when you have a moment?
Thanks, David
On Mon, May 17, 2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Whee, two more ports dropping stabs. Committed to the trunk.
Jeff
commit 18e9e7db7afb8635316414b560c10852db13c4c1
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Thu Aug 19 14:15:03 2021 -0400
Drop stabs from h8/300 and v850 ports
gcc/
* config.gcc (h8300-*-elf*): Do not include dbxelf.h.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 05:46:58PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:23:50PM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > Suppress exceptions (when specified), by saving, manipulating, and
> > restoring the FPSCR. Similarly, save, set, and restore the floating-point
> > rounding
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
