This patch adds basic V2QImode infrastructure and V2QImode arithmetic
operations (plus, minus and neg). The patched compiler can emit SSE
vectorized QImode operations (e.g. PADDB) with partial QImode vector,
and also synthesized double HI/LO QImode operations with integer registers.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
--- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
I think I was wrong and this has not regressed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
--- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Seems like this regressed. Do I open a new bug report?
On 12/29/2021 7:21 PM, shi...@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
From: LiaoShihua
following 'false' branch in line 20, 'tmp.word_state' leaks in line 26. So
free 'tmp.word_state' before return 'rval'.
gcc/testsuite\ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/analyzer/pr103526.c:
Umm, isn't the whole point of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rpsalmi at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103867
Bug ID: 103867
Summary: Redefinition of typeinfo name of default argument
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE with |[11 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52441f18db7e051c16f2e6e12f415b93cb5450c4
commit r12-6153-g52441f18db7e051c16f2e6e12f415b93cb5450c4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dbe26b949c6142b278ab7af2bac4545e8d524f2
commit r12-6151-g1dbe26b949c6142b278ab7af2bac4545e8d524f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1820137ba624d7eb2004a10f9632498b6bc1696a
commit r12-6150-g1820137ba624d7eb2004a10f9632498b6bc1696a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
On 12/29/2021 3:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
We get a -fcompare-debug FAIL on the following testcase. The problem is
that during cprop we get when a TImode pseudo holding x is being
constructed:
(debug_insn 111 59 103 7 (var_location:TI D#2 (clobber (const_int 0 [0]))) -1
(nil))
On 12/29/2021 3:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi!
The following testcases ICE when an optimize or target pragma
is followed by a long line (4096+ chars).
This is because on such long lines we can't use columns anymore,
but the cpp_define calls performed by
On 12/30/2021 3:08 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:43:32AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The following testcase is miscompiled, because a prologue which
contains subq $8, %rsp instruction is emitted at the start of
a basic block which contains conditional jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--disable-dlopen doesn't help anyway, we still get:
checking whether the /home/jwakely/build-mips-elf/gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jwakely/build-mips-elf/gcc/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
More generally, it would be good if --with-newlib wasn't needed as a kluge to
mean "no libc" as well as "libc is newlib". It's surprising to users that
--without-headers doesn't mean "no libc", but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> libstdc++-v3/configure.ac has:
>
> # Libtool setup.
> if test "x${with_newlib}" != "xyes" && test "x${with_avrlibc}" != "xyes";
> then
> AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #40 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I opened Bug 103866 for this build error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
libstdc++-v3/configure.ac has:
# Libtool setup.
if test "x${with_newlib}" != "xyes" && test "x${with_avrlibc}" != "xyes"; then
AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN
fi
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
ACX_LT_HOST_FLAGS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Bug ID: 103866
Summary: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL not compatible with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #39 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> (In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #33)
> > At the moment, I don't understand if it's possible to spawn a cross compiler
> > with a freestanding libc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The difficulty is that every case where configure sets gcc_no_link is generated
from the same file: ../config/no-executables.m4
So adding something in there doesn't actually give you any context.
Each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #6)
> This problem seems to be back in GCC 9 and 11:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103862
As pointed out in a comment there, it's a different case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh shut up, you tedious clown. Cut the attacks and abuse or I'll block every
account you try to create here (as happens in every other venue where you try
to share your opinions by attacking people).
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:43:32AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The following testcase is miscompiled, because a prologue which
> contains subq $8, %rsp instruction is emitted at the start of
> a basic block which contains conditional jump that depends on
> flags register set in an earlier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
Bug ID: 103865
Summary: virtual function can have a requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Hi!
The following testcase is miscompiled, because a prologue which
contains subq $8, %rsp instruction is emitted at the start of
a basic block which contains conditional jump that depends on
flags register set in an earlier basic block, the prologue instruction
then clobbers those flags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98977
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
LLVM has a separate module to merge sub and cmp, GCC can do similar thing.
Alternative choice is canonicalizing cmp patterns to be same as subs' with a
unused dest(result of sub), then CSE/PRE would be able to
Hi!
The r11-3302-g3696a50beeb73f changes broke the following ObjC testcase.
in_statement is either 0 (not in a looping statement), various IN_* flags
for various kinds of looping statements (or OpenMP structured blocks) or
those flags ored with IN_SWITCH_STMT when a switch appears inside of those
Hi!
In the following testcase we incorrectly error about pasting / token
with padding token (which is a result of __VA_OPT__); instead we should
like e.g. for ##arg where arg is empty macro argument clear PASTE_LEFT
flag of the previous token if __VA_OPT__ doesn't add any real tokens
(which can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103864
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103864
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> This is interesting, GCC 10.3.0 works but GCC 10.2.0 ICEs. Now I wonder
> fixed it on the branch. I even tried -fno-vect-cost-model to see if it
> failed in GCC 10.3.0.
Hmm, lemme bisect that as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103864
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
Oh ye no it is probably terrible missuse trying to write into the constructor.
=)
Maybe I should look into barring that entrypoint for constructors. Kinda
overlooked
that rvalue arrays could be used as lvalues.
/Petter
Från: Antoni Boucher
Skickat: den 30 december 2021 02:40
Till: Petter
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
