https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 106652, which changed state.
Bug 106652 Summary: [C++23] P1467 - Extended floating-point types and standard
names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 107685, which changed state.
Bug 107685 Summary: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in
constexpr functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107628
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1115dbfea4d6df51d608cece7416d658d2e2822
commit r13-4162-gb1115dbfea4d6df51d608cece7416d658d2e2822
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
Hi!
As the following testcase shows, the swap_rtx_condition function
in reg-stack can result in different code generation between -g and -g0.
The function is doing the changes as it goes, so does analysis and
changes together, which makes it harder to deal with DEBUG_INSNs,
where normally
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:53 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > OK, but now we have two more copies of a function that effectively
> > extends BF to SF. Can you please split this utility function out and
> > use it here and in
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OK, but now we have two more copies of a function that effectively
> extends BF to SF. Can you please split this utility function out and
> use it here and in cbranchbf4/cstorebf4? I'm talking about this part:
>
> + op =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk
--- Comment
Hi!
While reporting PR107748 (where is a problem with non-uglified names,
but I've left it out because it needs fixing anyway), I've noticed
various spots where identifiers in *intrin.h headers weren't uglified.
The following patch fixed those that are related to unions (I've grepped
for
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo