This patch implements "omp declare mapper" functionality for Fortran,
following the equivalent support for C and C++.
Fortran differs quite substantially from C and C++ in that "map"
clauses are naturally represented in the gfortran front-end's own
representation rather than as trees. Those are
This patch fixes some cases for OpenACC and OpenMP where map clauses were
being expanded (adding firstprivate_pointer, attach/detach nodes, and so
forth) unnecessarily, after the "OpenMP/OpenACC: Rework clause expansion
and nested struct handling" patch (approved but not yet committed):
Following from discussion in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570075.html
and:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608100.html
and also upstream OpenMP issue 342, this patch changes mapping for array
sections of pointer components on compute regions
This patch adds support for non-constant component offsets in "map"
clauses for OpenMP (and the equivalants for OpenACC), which are not able
to be sorted into order at compile time. Normally struct accesses in
such clauses are gathered together and sorted into increasing address
order after a
This patch trivially adds braces and reindents the
OMP_CLAUSE_TO/OMP_CLAUSE_FROM/OMP_CLAUSE__CACHE_ stanza in
c_finish_omp_clause and finish_omp_clause, in preparation for the
following patch (to clarify the diff a little).
2022-09-13 Julian Brown
gcc/c/
* c-typeck.cc
Following on from here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608577.html
this is a complete patch series, rebased against mainline. The final
three patches are the revised C "lvalue"-parsing patches and C and Fortran
"declare mapper" support patches mentioned in that email.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108208
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Ah, based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427700#c3 &
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427700#c5, maybe the source really
does just need splitting.
How has this been tested?
In file included from ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:89:
../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.h: In member function
'riscv_vector::avl_info riscv_vector::vl_vtype_info::get_avl_info() const':
../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.h:175:43: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108207
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
Ah, Andrew, before you beat me to it... this doesn't ICE if you pass
-fno-ms-extensions, and it does ICE on Linux if you pass -fms-extensions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108208
Bug ID: 108208
Summary: Build failure on large LLVM source files on PPC
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108207
Bug ID: 108207
Summary: ICE in testcase g++.dg/other/ptrmem8.C on mingw
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
> Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches writes:
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>> The first instruction scheduler pass reorders instructions in the TRY
>>> block in a way `b=true' gets executed before the call to the function
>>> `f'. This optimization is
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've
> > generally come to think that that part isn't Wine and is instead
> > either the testsuite or deja. So I'll keep those replies to
Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> The first instruction scheduler pass reorders instructions in the TRY
>> block in a way `b=true' gets executed before the call to the function
>> `f'. This optimization is wrong, because
---
htdocs/index.html | 24
htdocs/news.html | 24
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/index.html b/htdocs/index.html
index 2ddee6f6..2ab65a95 100644
--- a/htdocs/index.html
+++ b/htdocs/index.html
@@ -92,30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107548
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b2c1369d035e92847cca81fd9f7b4e9ab9da710
commit r13-4873-g0b2c1369d035e92847cca81fd9f7b4e9ab9da710
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106933
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24a7980d0f48671ea13da18c9162a43420b5af58
commit r13-4872-g24a7980d0f48671ea13da18c9162a43420b5af58
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106959
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24a7980d0f48671ea13da18c9162a43420b5af58
commit r13-4872-g24a7980d0f48671ea13da18c9162a43420b5af58
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
This patch adds an Atom feed for GCC news, which can then be easily
aggregated in other sites, such as the GNU planet
(https://planet.gnu.org).
The feed lives in a file news.xml, and this patch initializes it with
the latest entry in News as an example.
---
htdocs/index.html | 9 -
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 09:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 02:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Libstdc++
> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
> > > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:37:04 +0100
> >
> > > This is the largest missing piece of C++20 support. Only the
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
This assertion fails for cris-elf where sizeof(datetime) is only 7, due
to lower alignment requirements. The assertion was used while I was
writing the code to check that the objects were as compact as I wanted,
but it doesn't need to be kept now.
This patch adds an entry to the News section in index.html, announcing
the availability of a nightly build of bpf-unknown-none-gcc.
---
htdocs/index.html | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/htdocs/index.html b/htdocs/index.html
index 655b7373..e91fadf1 100644
---
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 02:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> > From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
> > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:37:04 +0100
>
> > This is the largest missing piece of C++20 support. Only the cxx11 ABI
> > is supported, due to the use of std::string in the API for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |ICE: tree check: expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
@Marek: PING
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
