git commit g:f203ded5492eb786d7da230eb730de16eff9e439
gcc-descr r11-11309-gf203ded5492eb7
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 05:01:35 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114590
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
CC|
git commit g:4c8b3600c4856f7915281ae3ff4d97271c83a540
gcc-descr r14-9799-g4c8b3600c4856f
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 04:00:58 UTC 2024
Regressions on master at commit r14-9787 vs commit r14-9773 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects
of unexpected failures402
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 10826
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240404 (experimental) [master r14-9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114574
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57874|0 |1
is obsolete|
git commit g:4c8b3600c4856f7915281ae3ff4d97271c83a540
gcc-descr r14-9799-g4c8b3600c4856f
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc2.20240402git026e680b0a08.24.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:4c8b3600c4856f7915281ae3ff4d97271c83a540
gcc-descr r14-9799-g4c8b3600c4856f
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 03:32:57 UTC 2024
Hello!
I am trying to slightly modify the source code of GCC to display some
messages when the compiler is executed in the terminal. For example, when
'gcc source.c' is executed, I want a print message saying "Building with
GCC..." and if the build is successful, "Build Successful!" should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49395
Hubert Tong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
git commit g:f203ded5492eb786d7da230eb730de16eff9e439
gcc-descr r11-11309-gf203ded5492eb7
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 03:32:13 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114598
wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599
Bug ID: 114599
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_set_bit(bitmap_head*, int)
(bitmap.cc:975) with -O2 -fcondition-coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114598
Bug ID: 114598
Summary: [GCC-14] Miscompilation of `#pragma omp parallel for`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
--- Comment #3 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Thanks a lot, I have checked it out.
I'm still somewhat confused. Does the difference in compilation stem from GCC
interpreting "=m" and "=r" differently, leading it to assume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] wrong|[13 Regression] wrong code
of unsupported tests 3437
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes601658
# of unexpected failures401
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unsupported tests 10826
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 4 17:05:31 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9788-gb7bd2ec73d6)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14
On 4/4/24 19:15, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:28:22PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/4/24 14:43, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:14:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/2/24 13:52, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
git commit g:7f6792487bf93b41a9b1aafd3e4348f228fd0d91
gcc-descr r13-8588-g7f6792487bf93b
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 02:30:18 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Bug ID: 114597
Summary: [GCC-14] Miscompilation of pointer assignment with
inline assembly
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
git commit g:5192e72e7e1fe63ff0b9d8b05c26018ba5dd1ba3
gcc-descr r14-9797-g5192e72e7e1fe6
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 01:34:06 UTC 2024
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1931/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-04-05T03:07:18+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-9799-g4c8b3600c48) armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Native configuration is armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== libatomic tests ===
Running
git commit g:0611f480013fe998b9657a6b51d645c4b1489bbe
gcc-descr r12-10313-g0611f480013fe9
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc2.20240402git026e680b0a08.24.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:0611f480013fe998b9657a6b51d645c4b1489bbe
gcc-descr r12-10313-g0611f480013fe9
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 02:21:40 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 57883
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57883=edit
patch to add instrumentation as diagnostic aid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
Bug ID: 114596
Summary: [OpenMP] "declare variant" scoring seems incorrect for
construct selectors
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
unexpected failures125
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1556
# of unsupported tests 4118
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240404 (experimental) [master r14-9793-ga24476422ba] (GCC)
==
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1556
# of unsupported tests 4103
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240404 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9793-ga24476422ba] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114545
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114559
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114591
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114511
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
git commit g:7f6792487bf93b41a9b1aafd3e4348f228fd0d91
gcc-descr r13-8588-g7f6792487bf93b
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc2.20240402git026e680b0a08.24.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:5192e72e7e1fe63ff0b9d8b05c26018ba5dd1ba3
gcc-descr r14-9797-g5192e72e7e1fe6
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 00:42:31 UTC 2024
git commit g:5192e72e7e1fe63ff0b9d8b05c26018ba5dd1ba3
gcc-descr r14-9797-g5192e72e7e1fe6
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 00:43:50 UTC 2024
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:27 AM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> go has a go.dvi build rule, but lacks the go.install-dvi one.
>
> 2024-04-04 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/go/
> * Make-lang.in (go.install-dvi): New rule.
This is OK. Thanks.
Ian
The xpassing change in generated code was as follows, at
r14-9788-gb7bd2ec73d66f7 (where I locally applied a revert
to verify that this suspect was the cause). That was so
much of an improvement that I had to share it! Worth the
testsuite churn anyway. :)
Segher, if you end up reverting
Committed as obvious.
-- >8 --
I noticed my autotester for cris-elf flagging this as a regression.
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Adjust pattern for targets with
symbols having a leading underscore.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 2 +-
1 file changed,
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c8b3600c4856f7915281ae3ff4d97271c83a540
commit r14-9799-g4c8b3600c4856f7915281ae3ff4d97271c83a540
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:16 2024 +0200
testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-2.c: Handle xpass from combine improvement
After
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b36e86d6af3b305207c1aa6d56c2b350fefba65
commit r14-9798-g3b36e86d6af3b305207c1aa6d56c2b350fefba65
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
Date: Fri Apr 5 01:36:54 2024 +0200
testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Handle leading-underscore
I noticed my autotester
uccesses 12
# of expected failures 1597
# of unsupported tests 5021
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240404
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9796-g27b6d081f6] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #26 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
must of course be "... / scale".
How can I still edit posts?
an/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179279
# of unexpected failures114
# of unexpected successes 19
# of expected failures 1614
# of unsupported tests 4244
/home/gccbuild/build/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #25 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
Hi Matthias,
to get good results on average (all FP-types: (B)FP16..FP128,
scalar/vectorized(SIMD)/parallel/...) this algorithm seems to me (so far) to be
suitable:
template
inline constexpr Type
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:34 PM wrote:
>
> On 3 April 2024 15:49:13 CEST, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>
>
> >> OK witht that change.
> >> Honza
> >
> >I am checking in this patch with the updated comments:
> >
> > /* Disable indirect call profiling for an IFUNC resolver and its
> > callees since it
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240404
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8587-ge67f95ca64] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution
On 3 April 2024 15:49:13 CEST, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>> OK witht that change.
>> Honza
>
>I am checking in this patch with the updated comments:
>
> /* Disable indirect call profiling for an IFUNC resolver and its
> callees since it requires TLS which hasn't been set up yet when
> the
outputs-23 exe savetmp named2-2: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-24 exe savetmp named2-3: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-25 exe savetmp named2-4: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld_args
=== gcc Summary ==
5241
# of unsupported tests 23123
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240404
(experimental) [master r14-9796-g27b6d081f6] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c scan-assembler
unexpected successes 5
# of expected failures 56
# of unresolved testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 1464
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version
14.0.1 20240404 (experimental) [native/master r14-9796-g27b6d081f68] (GCC)
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 4 21:40:06 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9796-g27b6d081f68)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114595
--- Comment #1 from absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn ---
gcc-4's result:
```
func_1():
movlg1(%rip), %eax
andl$1, %eax
movb%al, g2(%rip)
movl%eax, g3(%rip)
ret
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114595
Bug ID: 114595
Summary: rtl-expand emit redundant store for bitwise-and
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
2079
# of unexpected failures170
# of unexpected successes 14
# of expected failures 1468
# of unsupported tests 3885
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-12/gcc/xgcc version 12.3.1 20240404
[remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10312-g5849685a41] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ion 13.2.1 20240404
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8587-ge67f95ca64] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O1 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O2
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:28:22PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/4/24 14:43, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:14:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 4/2/24 13:52, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/13?
> > > >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.5.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 85570, which changed state.
Bug 85570 Summary: Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving
templates fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karol.wozniak at linuxmail dot
org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> I guess I should add the test.
Though cpp23/lookup2.C does look close to this testcase here.
cbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240404
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9796-g27b6d081f68] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57378
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note with checking enabled we get an ICE:
:23:17: error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
23 | { return foo(); }
| ^
Hi.
This patch adds a new API to produce an rvalue representing the
alignment of a type.
Thanks for the review.From 12d8e57ca2313002da42672dc86b167baf812ff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:57:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add ability to get the
failures 3852
# of unsupported tests 20896
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-12/gcc/xg++ version 12.3.1 20240404
[remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10312-g5849685a41] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
get/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopctb\\t%v24,%v24
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopcth\\t%v24,%v24
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes180732
# of unexpected failures182
# of unexpected successes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-04
Snapshot gcc-11-20240404 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240404/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-07-31 00:00:00 |2024-4-4
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86748
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Richard: Can you please update Known to work?
Looks to be the wrong bug #.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o_kniemeyer at maxon dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94404
Status|SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
an/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179278
# of unexpected failures114
# of unexpected successes 19
# of expected failures 1614
# of unsupported tests 4244
/home/gccbuild/build/
On 2024-04-04 17:35, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote:
>> TL;DR: For the sake of improving precommit CI coverage and simplifying
>> workflows, I’d like to request a patch submission policy change, so
>> that we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114594
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
The "leak" was fixed in htop by
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/commit/62c2d820add3dadea7569af051d2afd804f08432
failures 5241
# of unsupported tests 23091
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240404
(experimental) [master r14-9791-g1df56719bd] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c scan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Adjusted testcase:
union a {
unsigned short b;
int c;
signed short d;
};
int e, f = 1, g;
long h;
const int **i;
void j(union a k, int l, unsigned m) {
const int *a[100];
i = [0];
h = k.d;
}
uccesses 12
# of expected failures 1597
# of unsupported tests 5021
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240404
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9791-g1df56719bd] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Hi Jerry,
I think for the current testcases, I like the patch – the question is
only what's about:
',3' as input for 'comma' (or '.3' as input for 'point')
For 'point' – 0.3 is read and ios = 0 (as expected)
But for 'comma':
* GCC 12 reads nothing and has ios = 0.
* GCC 13/mainline has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114594
Bug ID: 114594
Summary: Issues seen with -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak on
htop/XUtils.c: String_split
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Thanks, I will bootstrap and test the patch on x86_64 and submit it
for review then.
Can I ask you, can you please modify the testcase so that it does not
use printf but simply calls __builtin_abort in the
A failed build has been detected on builder gcc-autoregen while building gcc.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/269/builds/4154
Build state: failed 'git diff ...' (failure)
Revision: 27b6d081f68528435066be2234c7329e31e0e84f
Worker: bb3
Build
1 - 100 of 921 matches
Mail list logo
