Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes?

2024-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:22 AM FX Coudert via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > > I usually just install with install-no-fixedincludes, but really this > > should probably be a configure option and default to on. > > It would be great if we could measure what fixincludes are still needed, > on which targets.

Results for 15.0.0 20240607 (experimental) [src r15-1099-g5b6d5a886ee] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 7 12:49:11 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1099-g5b6d5a886ee) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240606 (experimental) [src r15-1070-g3a4775d4403] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-07 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 6 13:23:01 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1070-g3a4775d4403) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240605 (experimental) [src r15-1034-g58ecd2eb507] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Jun 5 12:46:01 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1034-g58ecd2eb507) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240604 (experimental) [src r15-1010-g00fb385a25a] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-05 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 4 12:59:09 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1010-g00fb385a25a) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240603 (experimental) [src r15-992-g6fb43d1b90e] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-04 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 3 13:50:00 UTC 2024 (revision r15-992-g6fb43d1b90e) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [src r15-950-g7fb62627cfb] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-06-03 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 20:32:59 UTC 2024 (revision r15-950-g7fb62627cfb) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [src r15-942-gd9c90c82d90] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-31 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 13:16:04 UTC 2024 (revision r15-942-gd9c90c82d90) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240530 (experimental) [src r15-928-g71899d6b4e1] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-31 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu May 30 13:20:22 UTC 2024 (revision r15-928-g71899d6b4e1) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240529 (experimental) [src r15-898-g4ccb3366ade] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-30 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 29 13:27:02 UTC 2024 (revision r15-898-g4ccb3366ade) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) [src r15-863-ga3aeff4ce95] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-29 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue May 28 14:11:53 UTC 2024 (revision r15-863-ga3aeff4ce95) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240527 (experimental) [src r15-853-gc5a7628470a] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-28 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 27 20:30:10 UTC 2024 (revision r15-853-gc5a7628470a) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Re: FSF copyright assignment

2024-05-25 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
Hi, Seyed Welcome. Glad that you want to contribute to GCC. GCC accepts contributions from developers who either execute a copyright assignment to the Free Software Foundation OR who certify the Developer Certificate of Origin for their contributions. https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [src r15-795-g0b3b6a8df77] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-24 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu May 23 19:12:15 UTC 2024 (revision r15-795-g0b3b6a8df77) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240522 (experimental) [src r15-763-gffab721f3c9] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-23 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 22 01:07:16 UTC 2024 (revision r15-763-gffab721f3c9) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240521 (experimental) [src r15-754-g232a86f9640] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue May 21 13:33:18 UTC 2024 (revision r15-754-g232a86f9640) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240520 (experimental) [master r15-696-ge14c673ea9a] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-20 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 20 17:00:08 UTC 2024 (revision r15-696-ge14c673ea9a) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240516 (experimental) [src r15-634-gb59de411326] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-18 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 15:58:35 UTC 2024 (revision r15-634-gb59de411326) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240516 (experimental) [src r15-583-g556e777298d] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-17 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu May 16 13:57:21 UTC 2024 (revision r15-583-g556e777298d) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240513 (experimental) [src r15-434-g6d31a370e26] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-14 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 13 14:06:08 UTC 2024 (revision r15-434-g6d31a370e26) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240509 (experimental) [src r15-390-g46077992180] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-14 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 12 17:28:13 UTC 2024 (revision r15-390-g46077992180) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240509 (experimental) [src r15-367-gdbbd059b49e] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-12 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 23:59:57 UTC 2024 (revision r15-367-gdbbd059b49e) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240509 (experimental) [src r15-361-g52d4691294c] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 13:34:06 UTC 2024 (revision r15-361-g52d4691294c) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240507 (experimental) [src r15-310-ge60032b3823] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-08 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 8 02:12:26 UTC 2024 (revision r15-310-ge60032b3823) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240506 (experimental) [master r15-217-gf62e55a7d0a] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-07 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 6 22:37:55 UTC 2024 (revision r15-217-gf62e55a7d0a) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

[gcc r15-217] aix: Fix building fat library for AIX

2024-05-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f62e55a7d0aa03886227672272852926291c7f27 commit r15-217-gf62e55a7d0aa03886227672272852926291c7f27 Author: David Edelsohn Date: Sun May 5 16:17:51 2024 -0400 aix: Fix building fat library for AIX With the change in subdirectories, the code for libgfortran fat

Results for 15.0.0 20240506 (experimental) [src 8df91834117] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 6 14:19:02 UTC 2024 (revision 8df91834117) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (test for

Results for 15.0.0 20240505 (experimental) [src 2cc1d763013] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 5 20:20:38 UTC 2024 (revision 2cc1d763013) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (test for

Results for 15.0.0 20240501 (experimental) [src r15-95-ga12cae97390] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-03 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 1 22:25:21 UTC 2024 (revision r15-95-ga12cae97390) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240430 (experimental) [src r15-76-ga30d2e6bd0b] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-05-01 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 30 16:48:47 UTC 2024 (revision r15-76-ga30d2e6bd0b) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240429 (experimental) [src r15-54-g93a9c40ea97] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-30 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 29 23:44:32 UTC 2024 (revision r15-54-g93a9c40ea97) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240427 (experimental) [src r15-11-g140124ad54e] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-29 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Apr 27 21:35:46 UTC 2024 (revision r15-11-g140124ad54e) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 15.0.0 20240426 (experimental) [src r15-5-ga0bc71e4801] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-27 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 15:41:59 UTC 2024 (revision r15-5-ga0bc71e4801) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240425 (experimental) [src r14-10135-g1604f7cebc4] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-26 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 25 23:14:02 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10135-g1604f7cebc4) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240424 (experimental) [src r14-10108-gbc17a92380f] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-25 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 24 15:27:33 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10108-gbc17a92380f) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240423 (experimental) [src r14-10093-g6f0a646dd2f] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-24 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 23 15:24:18 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10093-g6f0a646dd2f) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240421 (experimental) [src r14-10058-ga44d16efa7a] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-23 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 21 15:36:44 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10058-ga44d16efa7a) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240419 (experimental) [src r14-10032-g85c187b2127] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 19 01:37:20 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10032-g85c187b2127) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240417 (experimental) [src r14-10008-g7c2a9dbcc2c] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-18 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 19:03:44 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10008-g7c2a9dbcc2c) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240416 (experimental) [src r14-9996-g48024a99e3c] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-17 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 16 18:35:56 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9996-g48024a99e3c) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240415 (experimental) [src r14-9982-g701e1b94066] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-16 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 15 23:57:18 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9982-g701e1b94066) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240415 (experimental) [src r14-9975-g52972ab5c75] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-15 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 15 15:35:53 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9975-g52972ab5c75) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240411 (experimental) [src r14-9926-g33f83d3cd84] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-15 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 11 21:42:43 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9926-g33f83d3cd84) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240410 (experimental) [src r14-9887-g4be1cc5f505] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-11 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 10 13:21:12 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9887-g4be1cc5f505) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240408 (experimental) [src r14-9835-g97069657c4e] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 8 14:37:50 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9835-g97069657c4e) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240405 (experimental) [src r14-9823-g4e3c8257304] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-08 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Apr 6 23:23:55 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9823-g4e3c8257304) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240405 (experimental) [src r14-9808-ga844095e17c] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 5 13:12:53 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9808-ga844095e17c) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240402 (experimental) [src r14-9755-gd5aa2ca06aa] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-05 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 2 16:54:55 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9755-gd5aa2ca06aa) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240331 (experimental) [src r14-9734-g14d0c863aa9] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-04-02 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 22:21:34 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9734-g14d0c863aa9) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240329 (experimental) [src r14-9723-ge162228e0ba] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-31 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 13:44:15 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9723-ge162228e0ba) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240327 (experimental) [src r14-9692-g839bc42772b] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-29 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 27 18:14:42 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9692-g839bc42772b) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240326 (experimental) [src r14-9680-gfb1d50e1f6e] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-27 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 26 22:35:47 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9680-gfb1d50e1f6e) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240324 (experimental) [src r14-9649-gbb04a11418f] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-26 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 24 23:21:18 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9649-gbb04a11418f) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240322 (experimental) [src r14-9619-ga44d7e8a520] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-24 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 22 13:48:26 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9619-ga44d7e8a520) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240321 (experimental) [src r14-9595-ga2fe34e0b99] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-22 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 21 13:49:45 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9595-ga2fe34e0b99) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240319 (experimental) [src r14-9544-gc7a774edbf8] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 19 14:26:15 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9544-gc7a774edbf8) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240318 (experimental) [src r14-9512-g942d470a5a4] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-19 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 18 01:37:54 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9512-g942d470a5a4) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [src r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-17 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 19:36:42 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9498-ga6dab195f70) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [src r14-9486-gd7d05824ae6] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-15 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 02:12:57 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9486-gd7d05824ae6) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240313 (experimental) [src r14-9453-g74bca21db31] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-14 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 13 15:54:20 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9453-g74bca21db31) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240312 (experimental) [src r14-9441-gef79c64cb57] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-13 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 12 17:26:42 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9441-gef79c64cb57) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240308 (experimental) [src r14-9401-gcebbaa2a845] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-12 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 8 21:35:10 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9401-gcebbaa2a845) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240306 (experimental) [src r14-9337-g71aad523144] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-08 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 6 14:26:51 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9337-g71aad523144) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Results for 14.0.1 20240305 (experimental) [src r14-9321-g2ba3171f161] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0

2024-03-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 5 17:16:04 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9321-g2ba3171f161) Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1

Re:

2023-11-18 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:23 PM Zebediah Beck via Gcc wrote: > I would like that contribute technical documentation to the community. > Hi, Zebediah Thanks for your interest in GCC. Welcome! Improvements to the GCC technical documentation would be a wonderful contribution. We also would be

Re: Recordings of cauldron 2023 talks

2023-11-18 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:34 PM Heiko wrote: > Hello, > > according to https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2023 it was planned to > make the talk recordings available afterwards. > I would be interested to follow them, but have not been able to find > them anywhere. > > My first guess was to look

Re: Code size explosion with -O2

2023-10-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 6:49 PM Jakub Svojgr via Gcc wrote: > Hello, > this is an extremely specific scenario - however while compiling > computer-generated code for a fibonnacci function which looks like this: > > I32 GF_fib_I_I(I32 L_0_0) > { > I32 L_2_0; I32 L_5_0; I32 L_6_0; > bb0:; >

Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

2023-09-28 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 4:00 PM Toon Moene wrote: > On 9/28/23 21:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > It is worse than that, usually the LTO format changes e.g. any time any > > option or parameter is added on a release branch (several times a year) > and > > at other times as well. > > Though,

Re: Unexpected behavior of gcc on pointer dereference & increment

2023-09-01 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 12:37 PM Tomas Bortoli via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > I recently discovered that the following C statement: > > pointer++; > > is semantically equivalent to the following: > > *pointer++; > > Is this due to operators' priority? To me, that looks weird. > Equivalent in the

Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?

2023-08-25 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:16 PM Michael Welsh Duggan via Gcc < gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > I am attempting to debug an issue in gcc (PR 110827, if curious). In > order to do this I have built a stage 1 compiler with debugging and > without optimization as discussed here: > >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libstdc++: Implement more maintainable header

2023-08-16 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Was the dependency added to the dependencies in contrib/gcc_update? Otherwise the timestamp can get out of sync in a Git checkout. Thanks, David On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:20 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:39,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libstdc++: Implement more maintainable header

2023-08-16 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Hi, Arsen This patch broke bootstrap because it has introduced a new GCC build requirement for autogen that is not a previous requirement to build GCC. Previously the repository has included post-processed files. +# AutoGen . +.PHONY: update-version +update-version: + cd ${bits_srcdir} &&

Re: [RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-15 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:07 PM Alexander Monakov wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > > Thanks, this is nicer (see notes below). My main concern is that we > > > shouldn't pretend there's some method of verifying that arbitrary > source > > > code is "safe" to pass to

Re: [RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-11 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:33 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2023-08-08 10:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > >> Do you have a suggestion for the language to address libgcc, > >> libstdc++, etc. and libiberty, libbacktrace, etc.? > > > > I'll work on this a bit and share a draft. > > Hi David, > >

Re: [RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-09 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:33 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2023-08-08 10:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > >> Do you have a suggestion for the language to address libgcc, > >> libstdc++, etc. and libiberty, libbacktrace, etc.? > > > > I'll work on this a bit and share a draft. > > Hi David, > >

Re: [RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-08 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 1:36 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 7:37 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > BTW, I think we should perhaps differentiate between production ready > > libraries (e.g. libgcc, libstdc++, libgomp, libatomic, libgfortran, > libquadmath, > > libssp) vs. e.g.

Re: [RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-08 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:07 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2023-08-08 10:04, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 3:35 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 6:02 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 02:52:57PM

[RFC] GCC Security policy

2023-08-07 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
FOSS Best Practices recommends that projects have an official Security policy stated in a SECURITY.md or SECURITY.txt file at the root of the repository. GLIBC and Binutils have added such documents. Appended is a prototype for a Security policy file for GCC based on the Binutils document

David Faust appointed BPF backend reviewer

2023-08-04 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed David Faust as BPF backend reviewer. Please join me in congratulating David on his new role. David, please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Re: [PATCH] match.pd: Implement missed optimization (~X | Y) ^ X -> ~(X & Y) [PR109986]

2023-07-25 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Hi, Drew Thanks for addressing this missed optimization. The testcase includes an incorrect assumption: signed char, which causes the testcase to fail on PowerPC. Should the testcase be updated to specify signed char in the function signatures or should -fsigned-char be added to the command

Re: Beginner Looking for Mentors to Get Started

2023-07-20 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
Hi, Veera Thanks for your interest in GCC. Welcome! A good place to start is the GCC Wiki Getting Started page: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/#Getting_Started_with_GCC_Development David Malcolm has written a wonderful introduction to GCC for newcomers:

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: replace '(const_int 0)' to 'unspec:BLK [(const_int 0)]' for stack_tie

2023-06-13 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 2:16 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Hi! > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:15:49AM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote: > > David Edelsohn writes: > > > > > > This definitely seems to be a better solution. > > > > > > The TARGET_CONST_ANCHOR change should not be part of this patch.

Re: [PATCH 1/4] rs6000: build constant via li;rotldi

2023-06-13 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:30 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > > > Hi David, > > David Edelsohn writes: > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:55 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch checks if a constant is possible to be rotated to/from a > > positive > > or negative value from "li". If so, we

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: replace '(const_int 0)' to 'unspec:BLK [(const_int 0)]' for stack_tie

2023-06-12 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Hi, Jiufu This definitely seems to be a better solution. The TARGET_CONST_ANCHOR change should not be part of this patch. Also there is no ChangeLog for the patch. This generally looks correct and consistent with other ports. I want to give Segher a chance to double check it, if he wishes.

[PATCH, AIX] Debugging does not require a stack frame.

2023-06-11 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
The rs6000 port has allocated a stack frame when debugging is enabled on AIX since the earliest versions of the port. Apparently the earliest versions of the debuggers for AIX had difficulty with stackless frames. Both AIX DBX and GDB support stackless frames on AIX, and IBM XLC, OpenXL and LLVM

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Guard __builtin_{un, }pack_vector_int128 with vsx [PR109932]

2023-06-11 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:19 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > Hi, > > As PR109932 shows, builtins __builtin_{un,}pack_vector_int128 > should be guarded under vsx rather than power7, as their > corresponding bif patterns have the conditions TARGET_VSX > and VECTOR_MEM_ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_P (V1TImode). This patch

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't use TFmode for 128 bits fp constant in toc [PR110011]

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:20 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > Hi, > > As PR110011 shows, when encoding 128 bits fp constant into > toc, we adopts REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE which is > to find the first float mode with LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE > bits of precision, it would be TFmode here. But the 128 >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldic

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This patch checks if a constant is possible to be built by "li;rldic". > We only need to take care of "negative li", other forms do not need to > check. > For example, "negative lis" is just a "negative li" with an additional > shift. > >

Re: [PATCH 3/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This patch checks if a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated > value from a negative value of "li/lis". If so, we can build the constant > through "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr". > > Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}. >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] rs6000: build constant via lis;rotldi

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:55 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This patch checks if a constant is possible to be rotated to/from a > negative > value from "lis". If so, we could use "lis;rotldi" to build it. > The positive value of "lis" does not need to be analyzed. Because if a > constant can be

Re: [PATCH 1/4] rs6000: build constant via li;rotldi

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:55 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This patch checks if a constant is possible to be rotated to/from a > positive > or negative value from "li". If so, we could use "li;rotldi" to build it. > > Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}. > Is this ok for trunk? > > BR, >

Re: Will GCC eventually learn to use BSR or even TZCNT on AMD/Intel processors?

2023-06-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:38 AM David Brown via Gcc wrote: > On 06/06/2023 14:53, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:36 +0800, Julian Waters via Gcc wrote: > >> Sorry for my outburst, to the rest of this list. I can no longer stay > >> silent and watch these little shits bully people

Re: Passing the complex args in the GPR's

2023-06-06 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:08 PM Umesh Kalappa via Gcc wrote: > Hi Segher , > > >>What did you expect, what happened instead? > For example the complex args are passed in GPR's for cexp in the case > GCC and Clang uses caller memory . > > for reference : https://godbolt.org/z/MfMz3cTe7 > > We

Re: [PATCH 1/4] rs6000: build constant via li;rotldi

2023-06-02 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Hi, Jiufu * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_rotated_to_possitive_li): New function. (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li): New function. (can_be_built_by_li_and_rotldi): New function. (rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Call can_be_built_by_li_and_rotldi. In English the word

YunQiang Su appointed MIPS maintainer

2023-06-01 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed YunQiang Su as MIPS maintainer. Please note that this is somewhat provisional because MIPS needs a full-time maintainer, but you do not have a long history of experience in the GCC Community. Please continue to be vigilant

Re: ping^^: [PATCH] rs6000: Enable const_anchor for 'addi'

2023-05-31 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:00 PM Jiufu Guo wrote: > > Gentle ping... > > Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes: > > > Gentle ping... > > > > Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm thinking that we may enable this patch for stage1, so ping it. > >>

Re: [PATCH 7/7] Expand directly for single bit test

2023-05-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:25 AM Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:17 AM David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > Hi, Andrew > > > > Thanks for this series of patches to improve do_store_flag. > Unfortunately > > this specific pat

Re: [PATCH 7/7] Expand directly for single bit test

2023-05-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
Hi, Andrew Thanks for this series of patches to improve do_store_flag. Unfortunately this specific patch in the series has caused a bootstrap failure on powerpc-aix. I bisected this failure to this specific patch. Note that I am building as 32 bit, so this could be a specific issue about bit

Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14

2023-05-09 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 4:40 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 May 2023, 21:13 David Edelsohn, wrote: > >> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:22 PM Eli Zaretskii via Gcc >> wrote: >> >>> > Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 21:07:07 +0200 >>> > From: Jakub Jelinek >>> > Cc: Jonathan Wakely , ar...@aarsen.me,

Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14

2023-05-09 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:22 PM Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote: > > Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 21:07:07 +0200 > > From: Jakub Jelinek > > Cc: Jonathan Wakely , ar...@aarsen.me, > gcc@gcc.gnu.org > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote: > > > > From: Jonathan Wakely

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >