Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite, arm: Fix testcase arm/pr112337.c to check for the options first

Ping On 2/19/2024 10:11 AM, Saurabh Jha wrote: On 2/9/2024 2:57 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 30/01/2024 17:07, Saurabh Jha wrote: Hey, Previously, this test was added to fix this bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337. However, it did not check the compilation

Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite, arm: Fix testcase arm/pr112337.c to check for the options first

On 2/9/2024 2:57 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 30/01/2024 17:07, Saurabh Jha wrote: Hey, Previously, this test was added to fix this bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337. However, it did not check the compilation options before using them, leading to errors

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, arm: Fix testcase arm/pr112337.c to check for the options first

Ping. I also don't have commit access so can someone please commit on my behalf. From: Saurabh Jha Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 5:07 PM To: Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches; Richard Sandiford; Kyrylo Tkachov; Richard Earnshaw Subject: [PATCH

[PATCH] testsuite, arm: Fix testcase arm/pr112337.c to check for the options first

Hey, Previously, this test was added to fix this bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337. However, it did not check the compilation options before using them, leading to errors. This patch fixes the test by first checking whether it can use the options before using them.

Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite, arm: Fix up pr112337.c test

On 12/1/2023 2:10 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 01/12/2023 13:45, Christophe Lyon wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 13:44, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 01/12/2023 11:28, Saurabh Jha wrote: Hey, I introduced this test "gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/pr112337.c" in th

[PATCH] testsuite, arm: Fix up pr112337.c test

2365aae84de030bbb006edac18c9314812fc657b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saurabh Jha Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:05:58 + Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up pr112337.c test --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/pr112337.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc

Re: [PATCH] Add a REG_P check for inc and dec for Arm MVE

Hi Christophe, On 11/20/2023 10:12 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Saurabh, On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 15:51, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: Hi Saurabh, -Original Message- From: Saurabh Jha Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 10:12 AM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw ; Richard

Re: [PATCH][Binutils] AArch64: Enable Debug (FEAT_DEBUGv8p9) extension

Hey, On 11/24/2023 8:42 AM, Saurabh Jha wrote: Hey, This patch enables FEAT_DEBUGv8p9 extension for AArch64 and adds its system registers. FEAT_DEBUGv8p9 is default from Armv8.9-A Architecture. Did regression testing for aarch64-none-elf target and found no regressions. Ok for master

[PATCH][Binutils] AArch64: Enable Debug (FEAT_DEBUGv8p9) extension

to commit on my behalf. Regards, Saurabh From 5600438d1fb31cc9d0135b92dfe792906e9fac73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saurabh Jha Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:50:35 + Subject: [PATCH] Enable Debug (DEBUGv8p9) extension for AArch64 --- gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/armv8_9-a-sysregs-bad.l | 2 ++ gas

[PATCH] Add a REG_P check for inc and dec for Arm MVE

check for INC and DEC operations From a53553878602c7050b4f027a19149ca643b11721 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saurabh Jha Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:33:35 + Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Add a REG_P check for inc and dec for Arm MVE It is okay to have operands in MEM for inc and dec in Arm MVE

Re: [pushed] [RA]: Modify cost calculation for dealing with pseudo equivalences

Hey, This is causing an ICE. Bug here: 112337 � arm: ICE in arm_effective_regno when compiling for MVE (gnu.org) Regards, Saurabh From: Vladimir Makarov Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 3:00 PM To:

Re: [PATCH v2][GCC] aarch64: Enable Cortex-X4 CPU

On 10/6/2023 2:24 PM, Saurabh Jha wrote: Hey, This patch adds support for the Cortex-X4 CPU to GCC. Regression testing for aarch64-none-elf target and found no regressions. Okay for gcc-master? I don't have commit access so if it looks okay, could someone please help me commit

[PATCH v2][GCC] aarch64: Enable Cortex-X4 CPU

Hey, This patch adds support for the Cortex-X4 CPU to GCC. Regression testing for aarch64-none-elf target and found no regressions. Okay for gcc-master? I don't have commit access so if it looks okay, could someone please help me commit this? Thanks, Saurabh gcc/ChangeLog   *

[PATCH][GCC] aarch64: Enable Cortex-X4 CPU

Hey, This patch adds support for the Cortex-X4 CPU to GCC. Regression testing for aarch64-none-elf target and found no regressions. Okay for gcc-master? I don't have commit access so if it looks okay, could someone please help me commit this? Thanks, Saurabh gcc/ChangeLog *

verify

verify