https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115335
Bug ID: 115335
Summary: std::span at method is missing feature test macro
__cpp_lib_span >= 202311L
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104636
--- Comment #4 from Artur Bać ---
So conclusion from Your arguments is to me that -std=c++20 doesn't guarantee
strict c++20 compatibility as another switches are required to force explicit
constructor be used only explicitly and disallow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
--- Comment #9 from Artur Bać ---
created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104641
Bug ID: 104641
Summary: Deduction guide for member template class rejected at
class scope when used with typename dependant type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
--- Comment #7 from Artur Bać ---
Do I have to open new bug because of You marked it as fixed while it is not
fixed ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
--- Comment #6 from Artur Bać ---
The typename was from my real code by mistake where value_type s template
param.
But in real code withing template I have to use typename and it doesn't work
with trunk too.
https://godbolt.org/z/E6Pavhfza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104636
Bug ID: 104636
Summary: implicit use of explicit constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
Artur Bać changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ebasoft dot com.pl
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102286
Artur Bać changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ebasoft dot com.pl
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102358
--- Comment #6 from Artur Bać ---
My bad. copy itself is constexpr since c++20, I was misleaded by overload used
for move_iterator with copy that has missing constexpr
template
auto __miter_base(move_iterator<_Iterator> __it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102358
--- Comment #4 from Artur Bać ---
In 12 ?
In 11.2.1/include/g++-v11/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
template
_GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
inline _Iterator
__miter_base(_Iterator __it)
and as it was mentioned overload in stl_iterator.h has missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102358
Artur Bać changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ebasoft dot com.pl
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104386
--- Comment #2 from Artur Bać ---
I think it is connected with this case
https://godbolt.org/z/cvfs1KqGW
https://godbolt.org/z/vdzTzo7be
//sizeof(foo) ==12
struct base
{
uint32_t x{};
std::byte v{};
base() noexcept = default;
};
struct foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104386
Bug ID: 104386
Summary: no_unique_address causes invalid member alignment of
pod struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58855
gcc at ebasoft dot com.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at ebasoft dot com.pl
15 matches
Mail list logo
