[Bug c/114366] New: computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114366 Bug ID: 114366 Summary: computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/105051] consider not combining malloc + memset to calloc when inside calloc itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105051 --- Comment #4 from Godmar Back --- Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. IMO, the detection doesn't need to be perfect in the sense of not having false negatives. All 3 bug reports of the calloc implementations you broke called malloc +

[Bug tree-optimization/105051] consider not combining malloc + memset to calloc when inside calloc itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105051 --- Comment #2 from Godmar Back --- Thank you for your reply. To make sure I understand, the only work-around is to completely disable all builtins (as in -fno-builtin), or is using `-fno-builtin-memset` as I proposed sufficient? I'm not

[Bug tree-optimization/105051] New: consider not combining malloc + memset to calloc when inside calloc itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105051 Bug ID: 105051 Summary: consider not combining malloc + memset to calloc when inside calloc itself Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/99588] New: variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588 Bug ID: 99588 Summary: variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal