http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47901
Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naesten at gmail
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: naesten at gmail dot com
For example:
naesten@hydrogen:~/hacking/bugs/gcc$ cat Og-inline-methods.cc
struct Foo {
int bar() {
return 42;
}
};
Foo foo;
int main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59515
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com ---
Oh, I meant to delete this part:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.18-gdb.py,
line
63, in module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920
Bug #: 53920
Summary: gcc -E does not honor #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored
-Wunused-macro
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50387
Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naesten at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com 2012-07-10
19:07:26 UTC ---
Oh, I suppose I should mention that I ran into this because I was using ccache
to compile Emacs with --enable-gcc-warnings, and by default ccache runs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905
Bug #: 53905
Summary: -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with
__attribute__((format(NSString,...)))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207
--- Comment #3 from Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com 2012-02-13
18:54:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This is clearly a matter for the SC. I'd suggest they seek approval from the
FSF to
(a) put suitable terms directly on gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52204
Bug #: 52204
Summary: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license
statement whatsoever
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207
Bug #: 52207
Summary: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up
the licenses of many other documents.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
--- Comment #2 from naesten at gmail dot com 2009-06-20 20:03 ---
Oh, hmm ... looks like you're right: I was looking at the wrong function in
objdump -- possibly because the functions somehow came out in a different order
in the object file from the source file.
Perhaps
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: naesten at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i486-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i486-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet
--
naesten at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: naesten at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40356
14 matches
Mail list logo