https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #27 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #26)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #25)
> > (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> > > Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #24 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #23)
> (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> > [...]
> > That instruction is useless and should never be used in asm except for
> > code-alignment reasons (1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #22 from Peter Cordes ---
Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the intrinsic for
MOVLPD?
It was defined in terms of _mm_store_sd (which this patch correctly changes to
remove the alignment requirement), so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Fixed by r10-5498 and r11-5429 .
Looks ok for -mtune=generic and non-Intel, but MOV/NEG isn't ideal on some
microarchitectures.
We still aren't using CMOV for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66261
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pcordes at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
